ctsnowstorm628 Posted February 4, 2014 Share Posted February 4, 2014 Holy NAM. PF would definitely approve of 0.75 qpf. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORH_wxman Posted February 4, 2014 Share Posted February 4, 2014 No I didn't..I never like SWFE here, and I'm not the least but shocked that things have trended warmer last minute. I don't think anything I'm stating it remotely ridiculous, 2-4 inches then a lot of ice is definitely a potential reality on the south shore. Noyes map is actually a pretty good depiction of what I think will happen snowfall wise. There could def be a narrow zone of decent icing in CT...like DXR area over to the interior Merritt region there. Hard to say for sure...a lot depends on how quick it flips to sleet and then ZR since the bulk of the precip falls in a relatively short time. A couple hours could make the difference between a quarter inch of ZR and just an inch of pellets on top of the snow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted February 4, 2014 Share Posted February 4, 2014 That 4" number looks very reasonable for MBY If I drew a map, that would be it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dryslot Posted February 4, 2014 Share Posted February 4, 2014 If the Nam is right you can untie PF from the chairlift Holy NAM. PF would definitely approve of 0.75 qpf. Sent from my iPhone Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ctsnowstorm628 Posted February 4, 2014 Share Posted February 4, 2014 Hahah I didn't see this. That's fantastic.Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sn0waddict Posted February 4, 2014 Share Posted February 4, 2014 There could def be a narrow zone of decent icing in CT...like DXR area over to the interior Merritt region there. Hard to say for sure...a lot depends on how quick it flips to sleet and then ZR since the bulk of the precip falls in a relatively short time. A couple hours could make the difference between a quarter inch of ZR and just an inch of pellets on top of the snow. Agree. The biggest concern for me is just the timing of all this & the impact it will have on the morning commute. These things tend to move in earlier than usual, so I think the snow we get is definitely done/changed over to sleet & ice by 6-8am. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dryslot Posted February 4, 2014 Share Posted February 4, 2014 Hahah I didn't see this. That's fantastic. Sent from my iPhone May get his 1st WSW if its right Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted February 4, 2014 Share Posted February 4, 2014 As we have stressed to the fine folks in VT for days...they will do just fine. Congrats on a deserved WSW. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheSnowman Posted February 4, 2014 Share Posted February 4, 2014 If I drew a map, that would be it. You Honestly think I'm only getting 6" when the NWS has me at NO mixing and 8-12 with a possible 14? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weathafella Posted February 4, 2014 Author Share Posted February 4, 2014 You Honestly think I'm only getting 6" when the NWS has me at NO mixing and 8-12 with a possible 14? You're not getting 14 unless you borrow Kevin's ruler. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoarfrostHubb Posted February 4, 2014 Share Posted February 4, 2014 The NAM supports Ray's jp area... S NH... That Rte 101 area in general, as Jay said yesterday makes sense. They do well in these events. 8-10" for me, leaning towards the 10" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H2Otown_WX Posted February 4, 2014 Share Posted February 4, 2014 NAM being so warm aloft is concerning for CT. I remember one SWFE last December where it was too aggressive with the warm punch though. Hopefully that is the case with this one. I'm at least confident in it being overdone with QPF Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dryslot Posted February 4, 2014 Share Posted February 4, 2014 Started an obs thread for this one if one of the mods want to pin it http://www.americanwx.com/bb/index.php/topic/42713-feb-5th-swfe-observation-thread/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted February 4, 2014 Share Posted February 4, 2014 You Honestly think I'm only getting 6" when the NWS has me at NO mixing and 8-12 with a possible 14? Yes. Their current map isn't very good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mreaves Posted February 4, 2014 Share Posted February 4, 2014 May get his 1st WSW if its right It's knocking on his door, according to BTV. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoarfrostHubb Posted February 4, 2014 Share Posted February 4, 2014 You Honestly think I'm only getting 6" when the NWS has me at NO mixing and 8-12 with a possible 14? I think 7-10" is your ballpark for this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dryslot Posted February 4, 2014 Share Posted February 4, 2014 NAM being so warm aloft is concerning for CT. I remember one SWFE last December where it was too aggressive with the warm punch though. Hopefully that is the case with this one. I'm at least confident in it being overdone with QPF Don't think its that far over done on qpf, There were a few models spitting out 1.0"+ qpf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUNNAWAYICEBERG Posted February 4, 2014 Share Posted February 4, 2014 There could def be a narrow zone of decent icing in CT...like DXR area over to the interior Merritt region there. Hard to say for sure...a lot depends on how quick it flips to sleet and then ZR since the bulk of the precip falls in a relatively short time. A couple hours could make the difference between a quarter inch of ZR and just an inch of pellets on top of the snow. DXR to OXC to MMK can get a good ice job. These are the types of events where people wake up, look outside and see its "raining and hailing", attempt to go to work and sit in traffic for 3hrs because everyone else thought the same thing and theres multiple fender benders on the same road. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DomNH Posted February 4, 2014 Share Posted February 4, 2014 NAM is a serious crushjob here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damage In Tolland Posted February 4, 2014 Share Posted February 4, 2014 For the record..I'd be perfectly fine with over 1/2 an inch of ice accretion on trees and powerlines.In fact i might be willing to sacrifice snowfall if someone could promise me 1 inch of ice Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clinch Leatherwood Posted February 4, 2014 Share Posted February 4, 2014 You're not getting 14 unless you borrow Kevin's ruler. May need to borrow that down here too! RGEM looks fine, but does seem warmer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
forkyfork Posted February 4, 2014 Share Posted February 4, 2014 if this run is correct nobody in CT gets more than 2-4" of snow Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoarfrostHubb Posted February 4, 2014 Share Posted February 4, 2014 Don't think its that far over done on qpf, There are a few models spitting out 1.0"+ qpf Yes. And look at the water vapor loop. Squishy http://www.goes.noaa.gov/GSSLOOPS/ecwv.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H2Otown_WX Posted February 4, 2014 Share Posted February 4, 2014 Don't think its that far over done on qpf, There are a few models spitting out 1.0"+ qpf Yeah, maybe not, I actually thought it was more til I looked at the accumulated precip. panels. I'll never understand 3 hour increments with 6 hr accum. precip. but whatever. I'm just guessing it'll be more in the 0.6-0.75 range. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TalcottWx Posted February 4, 2014 Share Posted February 4, 2014 Nam is the nam stop giving it a ton of credit Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoarfrostHubb Posted February 4, 2014 Share Posted February 4, 2014 if this run is correct nobody in CT gets more than 2-4" of snow Norfolk, CT (far NW corner) would still pull out 6"... with a icy candy coating Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheSnowman Posted February 4, 2014 Share Posted February 4, 2014 I think 7-10" is your ballpark for this. Agree on 8-10. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORH_wxman Posted February 4, 2014 Share Posted February 4, 2014 May need to borrow that down here too! RGEM looks fine, but does seem warmer. Yeah RGEM pushed north again a bit. This is pretty typical though. Its very wet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nzucker Posted February 4, 2014 Share Posted February 4, 2014 The NAM supports Ray's jp area... S NH... That Rte 101 area in general, as Jay said yesterday makes sense. They do well in these events. 8-10" for me, leaning towards the 10" You are finally going to get yours. Classic warm/north trend on the SW flow event as we saw a million times in 08-09 and 07-08. These storms almost always play out according to climo: NYC gets 2-4" then ice/rain, northern suburbs get 3-6" then ice, jackpot is from northern Massachusetts into southern NH and over towards the Green Mountains...looks like this one is going to play out that way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TalcottWx Posted February 4, 2014 Share Posted February 4, 2014 The NAM supports Ray's jp area... S NH... That Rte 101 area in general, as Jay said yesterday makes sense. They do well in these events. 8-10" for me, leaning towards the 10" Yeah I still think a jackpot area from n orh county north and east into the 101 region Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.