Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,609
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

February 4th-6th Overunning & Possible Coastal Threat


IsentropicLift

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Still warm and mostly rain.

 

Pretty close call for all snow on this run. It seems that the GFS may still have some problems translating the mid level changes towards the surface. 

 

 

I've been calling for a secondary forming near Ocean City Md for days now. The coast will have trouble regardless is the 850 low hangs on too long to the west

 

 

Nice call. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been calling for a secondary forming near Ocean City Md for days now. The coast will have trouble regardless is the 850 low hangs on too long to the west

 

In Euro/GGEM solution the island will get to 33-34 tops, 850's might not even get much above 0c if the GGEM verified. Think this is snow to ice to light rain in the end. There's no south wind component at all which will help keep the coast colder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been calling for a secondary forming near Ocean City Md for days now. The coast will have trouble regardless is the 850 low hangs on too long to the west

History argues for a transfer to generally occur no further north than that, usually if it does not occur by then it won't at all and given the signal it was trying to occur in the pressure bagginess you figure the GFS had to come around eventually

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In Euro/GGEM solution the island will get to 33-34 tops, 850's might not even get much above 0c if the GGEM verified. Think this is snow to ice to light rain in the end. There's no south wind component at all which will help keep the coast colder.

Yea I saw that earlier but if you take a blend of all guidance we are still slightly too warm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

History argues for a transfer to generally occur no further north than that, usually if it does not occur by then it won't at all and given the signal it was trying to occur in the pressure bagginess you figure the GFS had to come around eventually

 

Also, notice the isobars from the HP over Southern Canada? That has been intensifying on every run. So that's a signal that the confluence will become stronger in the future runs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not just the surface low transfer, keep in mind the 850 and 925 lows have to transfer as we'll. Those lows going NW of us means at least sleet mixing in. That's what we have to look for. The secondary low can't just be an appendage, it has to really take over.

This! Been saying this as well. I think the GGEM or Euro showed this earlier. We have so many threats and model runs that they are becoming blurred.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know that the H5 synoptics aren't exactly the same from 1/11/11 Vs. 2/5/14, but you can see similarities in terms of the storm transferring on the 1/11 storm Vs. the 2/5 storm. 

 

http://www.meteo.psu.edu/~fxg1/NARR/2011/us0112.php

 

I looked at the 00Z GFS for a connection and the storm from 1/11 has an earlier transfer near OBX and the GFS has the transfer near Ocean City, MD. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...