Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,609
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

February 4th-6th Overunning & Possible Coastal Threat


IsentropicLift

Recommended Posts

Precip on the GFS looks to last from roughly 03z Wed through 06z Thursday or so. So a solid 24hour+ event. Snow maps show 2-4" front end dump for NYC, Long Island and NNJ south of I-78. North of I-78 in NJ and northern PA is a 4-6" front end dump.

and how much ice ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

The 850mb low has to be south or east of us for the area to stay all snow. When it remains closed and goes NW of us, it practically guarantees a switch to at least sleet/ZR. The secondary will need to develop fast enough to close off an 850 and 925 low southeast of us. Without that, it eventually will change over.

I think it's becoming pretty clear this won't be an all snow event for most of us, but I think it will possibly resemble the December storm, maybe  a tad colder with a prolonged period of ice, if people are into that sort of thing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Way too early for any specifics. But the GFS has trended much higher with heights over Greenland as it is now developing a late-in-the-game pseudo blocking feature. We're starting to see results as this trends to develop earlier/faster and so the PV is tending to look more consolidated and farther south with the confluent flow on the newer model runs. I would watch this very carefully. We have seen blocks appear in this area inside 90 hours several times this season. 

 

I've attached the aforementioned height change map over the past 2 OP runs below (valid at 144 hours and the changes are occurring prior to this).

 

post-6-0-29474700-1391099186_thumb.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it's becoming pretty clear this won't be an all snow event for most of us, but I think it will possibly resemble the December storm, maybe  a tad colder with a prolonged period of ice, if people are into that sort of thing. 

It's still way too early to pinpoint specific impacts. The major snow events we had this month shifted around considerably just within 24-48 hours. The progressive nature of this pattern will cause model shifts for quite some time to come. We just have to keep hoping for a strong and east PV which stays a separate entity from the developing low.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Way too early for any specifics. But the GFS has trended much higher with heights over Greenland as it is now developing a late-in-the-game pseudo blocking feature. We're starting to see results as this trends to develop earlier/faster and so the PV is tending to look more consolidated and farther south with the confluent flow on the newer model runs. I would watch this very carefully. We have seen blocks appear in this area inside 90 hours several times this season. 

 

I've attached the aforementioned height change map over the past 2 OP runs below (valid at 144 hours and the changes are occurring prior to this).

 

attachicon.gifGFS_500mbHgt12hrChange_nhem_f147.png

That would be a huge game changer for us, if there can be some sort of blocking develop over Greenland.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That would be a huge game changer for us, if there can be some sort of blocking develop over Greenland.

 

Yeah, it definitely isn't a textbook block by any means but notable to see it trending towards higher heights over the last 12-24 hours in that area. This certainly explains why the PV has trended more consolidated and the confluent flow is appearing to push farther south.

 

The blocking continues to develop after the system anyway...so it sets us up for the period 2-4 days later regardless of whether this storm cuts into Buffalo or not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, it definitely isn't a textbook block by any means but notable to see it trending towards higher heights over the last 12-24 hours in that area. This certainly explains why the PV has trended more consolidated and the confluent flow is appearing to push farther south.

The blocking continues to develop after the system anyway...so it sets us up for the period 2-4 days later regardless of whether this storm cuts into Buffalo or not.

Oh boy that is going to help the weekend system john. Im excited for next weekend regardless what this storm does. I started a thread for the weekend storm already and would love to have your updates/insight on it.

Back to this storm the block being picked up on models and better PV orientation may help us in the end even the coastal areas but we'd need to start seeing the positive changes keep trending into the weekend

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even with unfavorable 850`s and the primary holding on long , The highest temps found in CNJ are around 34. hrs 150 - 156 

Unlike Dec when we rorared into the 50`s this time it gets to 38 into SNJ and onto the EAST end of Long Island .

 

Which tells me the model is really seeing the CAD .

If you redevelop just 6 hours earlier which would be possible if we get just the slightest press of the PV .

This is not as far off as one may think , based on where we sit now . 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even with unfavorable 850`s and the primary holding on long , The highest temps found in CNJ are around 34. hrs 150 - 156 

Unlike Dec when we rorared into the 50`s this time it gets to 38 into SNJ and onto the EAST end of Long Island .

 

Which tells me the model is really seeing the CAD .

If you redevelop just 6 hours earlier which would be possible if we get just the slightest press of the PV .

This is not as far off as one may think , based on where we sit now . 

wow where in CNJ did it get into the 50's in Dec? Here in New Brunswick only got up to 34, must have been a crazy coastal front 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yup.  High Point was at 7 and ACY was at like 57 (I remember noting a 50 degree temperature contrast in a rather small state!

The temp in Long Beach went from 26 to 46 in a few hours. That coastal front was absolutely ferocious. All our snow (we had close to 3") was gone in a flash. It actually felt balmy outside at warmest (I think we got to 48 that night).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I still like this storm as a possible analog. It shows you what can happen if the Polar Vortex can flex its muscles over New England when you have strong energy headed for the Ohio Valley.

 

image018.gif

That's a bold analog to show and probably not even close. That storm had a 1040+ mb high stretched to the north providing ample low level cold.

 

Would love to see a trend in the pseudo block up north as it could really help with the PV and confluence as was said. It would be a shame to waste such a moisture laden storm with mostly rain. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The natural barocliniticy of the east coast plus the surface/friction effects with land, especially the App mountains, will always promote some surface development near the coast.  But with the modeled trof axis so far west, there is little chance for the coastal to strengthen or the primary to weaken.  By the time the primary fills, most of the precip (except maybe a lingering firehose to the south) would be over... with just a weak 2nd coastal sliding E.  We need upper level divergence near the east coast to support a transfer.  That's not how this is currently modeled.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...