earthlight Posted December 19, 2010 Share Posted December 19, 2010 156 hrs..for those who want to save it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Midlo Snow Maker Posted December 19, 2010 Share Posted December 19, 2010 i love weather porn lol not a good way to start back in model threads Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteoutWX Posted December 19, 2010 Share Posted December 19, 2010 snow to slop back to snow Looks like alot of rain for us. Surface temps warm during the heart of the event ... Also 850 low goes north of us. DT called this yesterday, rain for RIC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alpha5 Posted December 19, 2010 Share Posted December 19, 2010 Just about as good as it gets for NYC anyone see the VV's? Insane, amazing dynamics for NYC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joey Posted December 19, 2010 Share Posted December 19, 2010 156 hrs..for those who want to save it. If that 700 low gets any further west, there could be some serious dryslotting issues for IMMEDIATE coastline. Just something to keep an eye out for. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitchnick Posted December 19, 2010 Share Posted December 19, 2010 some good news around VA and DCA thicknesses stay low during critical period when Low traveling in VA thanks to northern stream phasing http://www.nco.ncep....p120138_l.shtml Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
winter_warlock Posted December 19, 2010 Share Posted December 19, 2010 some good news around VA and DCA thicknesses stay low during critical period when Low traveling in VA thanks to northern stream phasing http://www.nco.ncep....p120138_l.shtml looks like all snow from dc, central va north Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jefflaw77 Posted December 19, 2010 Share Posted December 19, 2010 There is decent backlash snow with this type of track etc.. (I think - PLEASE CORRECT ME, if I am Wrong..) In any event, is this a 18+ hour event based upon what you are seeing? This seems really big NYC/Long Island.... What are the temps based upon what you are seeing? 156 hrs..for those who want to save it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WxUSAF Posted December 19, 2010 Share Posted December 19, 2010 The 850mb low tracks almost directly overhead of DC somewhere between 138 and 144hrs. That typically is a sign of precip mixing/changing to rain or ice. Despite that, it keeps the temps cold throughout the column at least for 138 and 144. Might have the rain/mix line creep up to the Potomac for a time as the low passes by, though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
clskinsfan Posted December 19, 2010 Share Posted December 19, 2010 Perfect track to bury everybody. Slight shift west and you could have mixing issues on the coast. As modeled though crushing snow storm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Chill Posted December 19, 2010 Share Posted December 19, 2010 If that 700 low gets any further west, there could be some serious dryslotting issues for IMMEDIATE coastline. Just something to keep an eye out for. Regardless of re-development, dryslotting, etc, it still looks good for accumulating snows on the front side. Accumulating snow on Xmas is a present that no money can buy (unless you're Midlo...lol). An EC monster would be awesome but I'll take the front end thump and smile even if we get dryslotted or the system deepens too far off the coast. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitchnick Posted December 19, 2010 Share Posted December 19, 2010 The 850mb low tracks almost directly overhead of DC somewhere between 138 and 144hrs. That typically is a sign of precip mixing/changing to rain or ice. Despite that, it keeps the temps cold throughout the column at least for 138 and 144. Might have the rain/mix line creep up to the Potomac for a time as the low passes by, though. it would be close, but I think DCA would stay snow this run per map and decent uvv's fighting off the warmth http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod/analysis/namer//gfs/12/gfs_850120138_l.shtml 700mb map http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod/analysis/namer//gfs/12/gfs_700120138_l.shtml Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
usedtobe Posted December 19, 2010 Share Posted December 19, 2010 this could throw a monkey wrench into it It even worries me for mby. I'd like ot see the 850 reform a little quicker a little farther to the south and east. You are getting wise in your old age. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
usedtobe Posted December 19, 2010 Share Posted December 19, 2010 The 850mb low tracks almost directly overhead of DC somewhere between 138 and 144hrs. That typically is a sign of precip mixing/changing to rain or ice. Despite that, it keeps the temps cold throughout the column at least for 138 and 144. Might have the rain/mix line creep up to the Potomac for a time as the low passes by, though. I don't like the 850 low position it would argue for mixing issues before turning back to snow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitchnick Posted December 19, 2010 Share Posted December 19, 2010 I don't like the 850 low position it would argue for mixing issues before turning back to snow. Wes, don't thicknesses as proged suggest a cold enough column? http://www.nco.ncep....p120138_l.shtml EDIT: for say DCA on north? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alpha5 Posted December 19, 2010 Share Posted December 19, 2010 Any shot that the Euro will come in somewhat close to this?? 0z Euro ensembles were more GFS like with the OP being relatively weak and south....phasing issues Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scarlet Pimpernel Posted December 19, 2010 Share Posted December 19, 2010 It even worries me for mby. I'd like ot see the 850 reform a little quicker a little farther to the south and east. Was thinking the same thing...a little wary of the 850 position, but maybe in the end it won't be too bad if the evolution happens as depicted (he said hopefully!)? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
clskinsfan Posted December 19, 2010 Share Posted December 19, 2010 I don't like the 850 low position it would argue for mixing issues before turning back to snow. It's trying to show a warm push at 138. But the storm bombs. Those of us from NOVA/ DC kind of know to expect some mixing in these storms though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ptb127 Posted December 19, 2010 Share Posted December 19, 2010 Ratios would probably be 12:1 or maybe even a little higher further inland..look for the -8 isotherm at 850 for best snow growth and ratios.. runs right through E PA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr No Posted December 19, 2010 Share Posted December 19, 2010 Anyone a bit concerned that it ends up further north in time? We need the cyclops to be far enough south to guide the storm ENE, then cause it to reform near the outer banks/capes. If the cyclops is too far north/weaker, the storm will be in the OV- whats to keep it south? Solutions like this GFS make me leary of any northern stream phasing. Twice bitten, once shy I guess. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
winterymix Posted December 19, 2010 Share Posted December 19, 2010 It's trying to show a warm push at 138. But the storm bombs. Those of us from NOVA/ DC kind of know to expect some mixing in these storms though. It looks A-OK to me. The 850 mb low trundles just barely ESE across DC and so the WAA at that level is quickly cut off. For NVA, DC, CMD, there could be some sleet mixing in but still, this looks like 8+ inches for a wide area just west and NW of I-95 even with a period of sleet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ptb127 Posted December 19, 2010 Share Posted December 19, 2010 QPF totals http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod/analysis/namer/gfs/12/images/gfs_p60_168m.gif Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WxUSAF Posted December 19, 2010 Share Posted December 19, 2010 I don't like the 850 low position it would argue for mixing issues before turning back to snow. Agree. DC would be on the border of snow-mix/rain-snow and the all snow. Still should be a few inches ahead of any changeover and several more after. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest someguy Posted December 19, 2010 Share Posted December 19, 2010 It even worries me for mby. I'd like ot see the 850 reform a little quicker a little farther to the south and east. You are getting wise in your old age. yeah the 850 Low isnt ideal for VA .. made this point last night Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest someguy Posted December 19, 2010 Share Posted December 19, 2010 It looks A-OK to me. The 850 mb low trundles just barely ESE across DC and so the WAA at that level is quickly cut off. For NVA, DC, CMD, there could be some sleet mixing in but still, this looks like 8+ inches for a wide area just west and NW of I-95 even with a period of sleet. You are assuming the 12Z and 0z GFS decpiction as well as the 12z and 0z Saturday GFS operational runs are valid Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LVblizzard Posted December 19, 2010 Share Posted December 19, 2010 What's this now, 7, 8, 9 straight runs with an east coast bomb on the GFS? That's amazing. It also has support from the Euro and UKMET so this is definitely our best threat of the winter so far. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TowsonWeather Posted December 19, 2010 Share Posted December 19, 2010 yeah the 850 Low isnt ideal for VA .. made this point last night /Agree. I am more than a little worried about this thing continuing to drift north (from a MD/VA perspective, that is). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edge Weather Posted December 19, 2010 Share Posted December 19, 2010 Cyclops? Anyone a bit concerned that it ends up further north in time? We need the cyclops to be far enough south to guide the storm ENE, then cause it to reform near the outer banks/capes. If the cyclops is too far north/weaker, the storm will be in the OV- whats to keep it south? Solutions like this GFS make me leary of any northern stream phasing. Twice bitten, once shy I guess. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stormtracker Posted December 19, 2010 Author Share Posted December 19, 2010 Anyone a bit concerned that it ends up further north in time? We need the cyclops to be far enough south to guide the storm ENE, then cause it to reform near the outer banks/capes. If the cyclops is too far north/weaker, the storm will be in the OV- whats to keep it south? Why do we care about where a Roman mythical one eyed creature is? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest someguy Posted December 19, 2010 Share Posted December 19, 2010 yeah ... I will as a screen shot so that the next time Rich is on the radio show and says "I dont see why the GFS has bad a rep" I can refer hiom to this map 156 hrs..for those who want to save it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.