Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,606
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    ArlyDude
    Newest Member
    ArlyDude
    Joined

Jan 21-22 Coastal Crusher Discussion/Model Thread


earthlight

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 664
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Strange, the HRRR doesn't look impressive at all for the area. Shifted heavier banding a good deal south. I'm surprised it's showing this

What? The 11z run looks fine.

m

I'm probably looking at it wrong then or something....but it looks like total accumulations are 4-6" for NNJ area...still snowing at 15 hours but not heavy. Last storm early January it showed total accumulations 10-12" here and I got 6, so I'm being just a bit cautious with the HRRR

Link to comment
Share on other sites

mI'm probably looking at it wrong then or something....but it looks like total accumulations are 4-6" for NNJ area...still snowing at 15 hours but not heavy. Last storm early January it showed total accumulations 10-12" here and I got 6, so I'm being just a bit cautious with the HRRR

The RAP is a very good model to use as well. Performed excellent in the 1-3-14 storm ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All of the models are indicating what I call a "panic period" later this morning and early afternoon as the initial slug of precipitation weakens a bit. But they all show banding rapidly increasing thereafter. Save this post -- I bet you all money we start to see people freaking out that the radar looks dry and too far south around 2pm.

 

Anyway, here's what follows and moves N:

 

rad8.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All of the models are indicating what I call a "panic period" later this morning and early afternoon as the initial slug of precipitation weakens a bit. But they all show banding rapidly increasing thereafter. Save this post -- I bet you all money we start to see people freaking out that the radar looks dry and too far south around 2pm.

 

Anyway, here's what follows and moves N:

 

Nice shot and nice way to ease the panic....I feel a tad bit calmer lol. That's a very interesting shot, as it does seem to show dual bands, as well as a very sharp cutoff once you get into NW NJ. Pretty much nothing there to heavy snow just a short drive south and east. I'm within the northern part of the heavier band here so in happy :) I also think that the NW model trends have ended. NAM and GFS trended NW every model run yesterday, as well as the RGEM, etc....I think we are zeroing in in a jackpot zone of Monmouth county (who would have thought ?!) into much of Long Island and SE NE. Will be fun to watch !!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh man! Coastal NJ and LI are going to walloped around that time! Going out on a limb and will say those in best VV are going to have some thundersnow for a period of time

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All of the models are indicating what I call a "panic period" later this morning and early afternoon as the initial slug of precipitation weakens a bit. But they all show banding rapidly increasing thereafter. Save this post -- I bet you all money we start to see people freaking out that the radar looks dry and too far south around 2pm.

 

Anyway, here's what follows and moves N:

 

 

 

Excellent preemptive message. I strongly agree. 

 

Once the initial snowfall wanes, there's no need to panic. This is going to be a very nice storm for much of the area. Even for areas well to the north and west of the NYC area, 4" or more snow is far better than what was modeled just a few days ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...