Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,609
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

1/21 Redeveloping Clipper Storm


DDweatherman

Recommended Posts

Matt you are not lol'ng at me anymore are you?.

 

I like to wait until verification before I start doing a snow dance....last 3 warnings I have a total of 1" cumulative...Plus as I said I dont care if 10" falls in Westminster or Bluemont VA or York Springs...Those are fantasy places to me like never-never land

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I enjoyed seeing the words "heavy snow" in LWX's afternoon discussion.  

 

 

Source:  http://forecast.weather.gov/product.php?site=NWS&issuedby=LWX&product=AFD&format=CI&version=1&glossary=1&highlight=off

 

Yes, very nice.  Almost had to do a double-take seeing those two words strung together for this area!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3/9/99, I got 12:1...ground truth the same...daytime storm starting around 8am - ending around 11pm.....temp 24-25.....This one wont be quite as wet, but I have to imagine, I will get better ratios on 1/20 than 3/9 even with similar temp profiles....that was a wetter storm coming from the west...I dont think it had canadian origin....This one will be more powder...14:1 should be reasonable

 

How this PJ s/w gets enough room between PV revolutions is beyond me! It truly is amazing timing and makes you wonder what is coming up next.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like to wait until verification before I start doing a snow dance....last 3 warnings I have a total of 1" cumulative...Plus as I said I dont care if 10" falls in Westminster or Bluemont VA or York Springs...Those are fantasy places to me like never-never land

You are in the game for as much as 7 or 8", i think you will be very happy tomorrow night.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Come back tomorrow night and we will see who is right. And it does not necessarily have to be you. I said someone in our subforum.

 

you dont seem to understand....I never said it would or wouldnt happen...I was laughing at your boyish enthusiasm and hyperbole over one model run with no basis other than model addiction...again...I dont give a f-uck what happens in Manchester MD....i couldnt care less

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Go here: http://weather.cod.edu/forecast/

 

Click on NAM, then 850mb and then choose "relative humidity." They plot streamlines on that image, so you can see the convergence zone/deformation zone working NW to SE. Someone in NE MD seems to get pivot action out of it. Also be sure to do this at the 700mb layer too. You'll see that zone is further to the NW, as usual.

Perfect.  Thank you!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How this PJ s/w gets enough room between PV revolutions is beyond me! It truly is amazing timing and makes you wonder what is coming up next.

 

yes...we did thread the needle a bit (assuming we verify)...And it does make the upcoming period more exciting than it looked just 36 hours ago

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you dont seem to understand....I never said it would or wouldnt happen...I was laughing at your boyish enthusiasm and hyperbole over one model run with no basis other than model addiction...again...I dont give a f-uck what happens in Manchester MD....i couldnt care less

I totally understand what you meant, btw it was 4 very fine looking models  ;) .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We don't have to wonder we have you here to tell us.

 

lol... well I take no credit for this storm should you guys verify your predictions. In the LR, I was downplaying these PJ waves and focusing my attention on late month. Hats off to Bob etc. who saw the potential.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

lol... well I take no credit for this storm should you guys verify your predictions. In the LR, I was downplaying these PJ waves and focusing my attention on late month. Hats off to Bob etc. who saw the potential.

You should do great on this one. You are in extreme SE PA correct?.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Go here: http://weather.cod.edu/forecast/

 

Click on NAM, then 850mb and then choose "relative humidity." They plot streamlines on that image, so you can see the convergence zone/deformation zone working NW to SE. Someone in NE MD seems to get pivot action out of it. Also be sure to do this at the 700mb layer too. You'll see that zone is further to the NW, as usual.

Neat site.  So much to see and learn.  Looking at the streamlines, is the convergence area denoted by non-paralell (meeting at angles) streamlines.  If so, looks like there is a pretty good zone out this way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...