Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,586
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    LopezElliana
    Newest Member
    LopezElliana
    Joined

January 21-22 maybe January 24th potential very cold snow event. It's gonna snow dammit!


weathafella

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

The SREF members -- tossable as some are -- give me the impression that it may set up with a nice steady band out around 495 and then better stuff SE MA but in between a bit risky. Just a possibility based on some of the features shown.

 

I'd rather not toss some of them.  :)

 

When does the RGEM come out?  I hear my bed calling for me.

 

16.2/5

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A funny read.

Going from 45-50°F Friday with nothing but squat in the future. To a surprise over the weekend, then to tracking. No complaints.

Mid Winter (as someone says) Deep, deep Arctic cold to follow. As to future the pattern looks to stay locked in and reloads next week.

 

QPF in winter is like Td in Summer. It's all about how it looks and feels.

 

  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When it comes to models does anyone really really trust the gfs, i dont . I mean even w the euro being unwell at 72 hrs i know i would rather take euro tonite and (maybe someone can post about its mid level features overnite )

I'm think area wide 5-10 from past 128 ,sw to 495/pike sw to Manchester/HFD area to nyc and se.

Im not sold on more

Except probably a 7-12 spot for e pym county GHG to PYM and I'd say 3-6 from 495 n to psm to quabbin to Norfolk ct.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

John, any updated thoughts??

 

I'm trying to get my head wrapped around this NAM solution ... huh.   

 

Thing is, it was stronger with the v-max cutting through the TV then off the MA, turning the corner clearly some 70 to 100 miles W of the 18z solution, but similar to last night's 00z run, it rather unexpectedly just vanishes significant v-max potency in the wrong area of the trough -- where it should be most intense.  

 

The sfc response in this run is actually a tick of longitude E of the 18z run, while expanding the circumvella of .10" slightly W.  Not a lot of this run makes much sense to me beyond 30 hours or so -- kind of hearkens to Scott's intimation re needing 24 hours before relevance kicks in.. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A) props for the avatar

B) coffee calling

C) this ain't our storm.

Prob a 4-6" type of thing for you and me and Chris

The B) was supposed to be a B. )

 

I'd put you on the higher end of that range.  Chris and I on the other hand......

 

OT, but while it's taking the cooler air an awfully long time to move east of the river, once it does, the temps do drop steadily.

 

15.6/4

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mid levels weaker as it passes us?

 

I thought they looked a bit better. I'm not going to concern myself over a low scored metric like QPF. I don't see anything unreasonable with the ranges in snowfall that have been thrown out.  The one thing this may not have is a good CCB as the low develops well south...but other factors will sort of suffice and take over. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

RGEM shifted SE again...not by a lot but its there. Its slower but further SE. The shortwave doesn't phase as well with the vortex in SE Canada...the better solutiuons like the 18z GFS phase that a bit which allows the main vortmax to pass right up over Cape Cod...but the NAM/RGEM solution doesn't allow this.

 

So this would likely keep the warning snows from the BOS=PVD corridor and southeast.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

RGEM doesn't look all that much different than the Euro or NAM.  Low is passing a few ticks outside of the BM for sure.

 

Less moisture...good OE signal which Ray loves.  It's cut back.

 

There will be a lot of cold dry air aloft so a cut in fantasy qpf numbers is a given.  I don't think anyone inside of I-495 has much to worry about, plowable snow incoming. Those hoping for epic are always setting themselves up for potential failure but a lot of weenies are going to see a nice SNE snow storm and some will get surprise lollies. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There will be a lot of cold dry air aloft so a cut in fantasy qpf numbers is a given.  I don't think anyone inside of I-495 has much to worry about, plowable snow incoming. Those hoping for epic are always setting themselves up for potential failure but a lot of weenies are going to see a nice SNE snow storm and some will get surprise lollies. 

 

There's going to be a crush zone like the last one.  OE is a big contributor with this one.  Somewhere between Scott and I is going to be over a foot, maybe well over.  Of course if models bumble SE it will change immediately as the flow becomes less favorable.

NAM, 4km and RGEM would pummel the areas Box has outlined with the blizzard watch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

RGEM shifted SE again...not by a lot but its there. Its slower but further SE. The shortwave doesn't phase as well with the vortex in SE Canada...the better solutiuons like the 18z GFS phase that a bit which allows the main vortmax to pass right up over Cape Cod...but the NAM/RGEM solution doesn't allow this.

 

So this would likely keep the warning snows from the BOS=PVD corridor and southeast.

 

I thought it looked a bit better than its 12z run. Heights were higher out ahead of it too. You can make an argument that the elongation and lack of a good curl to the s/w allows a more elongated srfc low and hence less of a CCB and more of a broad area of lift with embedded banding if you know what I mean. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

RGEM shifted SE again...not by a lot but its there. Its slower but further SE. The shortwave doesn't phase as well with the vortex in SE Canada...the better solutiuons like the 18z GFS phase that a bit which allows the main vortmax to pass right up over Cape Cod...but the NAM/RGEM solution doesn't allow this.

 

So this would likely keep the warning snows from the BOS=PVD corridor and southeast.

 

Yes.  Looks like a more convoluted development and you explained why well.  GFS sticks out now as the lone model with such pronounced development at 18z. 

 

8-12 on the coast seems like a good bet right now, with potentially more. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...