Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,607
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

January Banter Banter Thread Part2


H2O

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Finally some honesty from DT:

 

" By Friday there will be a total review of this event the forecasts.. MY forecasts.. what happened Why i Busted and where. It will be the MOST comprehensive review you will have EVER read from ANY meteorologist and will stun you with the bulls**t approach"

 

 

So, couldn't resist trolling his assertation that he's the only met EVER who will publish an analysis of why he was wrong with all the CWG forecast analyses.  My wife saw it pop up on her feed.  Swear to god her direct quote:

 

"who is he? Seems like a dbag who really likes to over capitalize everything..."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, couldn't resist trolling his assertation that he's the only met EVER who will publish an analysis of why he was wrong with all the CWG forecast analyses.  My wife saw it pop up on her feed.  Swear to god her direct quote:

 

"who is he? Seems like a dbag who really likes to over capitalize everything..."

He mentioned that the analyses CWG does are "nice," but that he provides a "much more meteorologically oriented" reason for why he busted. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So Jason gives the CWG gang a B+ for the forecast for this storm, but a B/B- for the forecast for 1/3. No way those two forecasts should be graded that close. The forecast for this storm was much more accurate, so if it's a B+ (I'd be ok with an A-), then the 1/3 forecast really should have been rated a C or C-. 

On 1/3, 2-5" verified in the 1-3" band that also showed equal chances of Boom (>3") and Bust (only a car-topper). Also, the forecast earlier that day was for a dusting to 2" with a T to 1" in southern areas, down from the previous night's 1-2". So, 3 maps for one storm going back and forth...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

AA County 2-hr delay is a little early too--- is it for the cold or the possibility of refreeze on roads (which is never as widespread as talked about)?

2hr for MoCo? Main and secondary roads are fine...saw some rough loving side streets though... :weenie:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Two hour delay doesn't make much sense unless because of the cold.... Though I am not saying that cold warrants a delay.

 

Anyway, it's not like the 2 hours is going to make much difference in the snow removal process.

 

Additionally, temps will remain below freezing for the entire day.

 

One last thing... What is a rough "loving" side street?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Two hour delay doesn't make much sense unless because of the cold.... Though I am not saying that cold warrants a delay.

 

Anyway, it's not like the 2 hours is going to make much difference in the snow removal process.

 

Additionally, temps will remain below freezing for the entire day.

 

One last thing... What is a rough "loving" side street?

:o

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In terms of the timing of the end of snow, the closest scenario where we got the 2-hr delay two days later was the Thursday after 1/25/00. But that was 8-12" countywide. 

Perhaps down county neighborhoods are still really bad....who knows...I was out today in Rockville and the roads seemed fine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ugh....I have to grocery shop again these kids have been home too much

 

Enjoy them for the rest of the week... school closed until Monday... just confirmed

 

http://www.loudoun.k12.va.us/site/default.aspx?PageType=3&DomainID=1&ModuleInstanceID=7221&ViewID=047E6BE3-6D87-4130-8424-D8E4E9ED6C2A&RenderLoc=0&FlexDataID=174868&PageID=1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...