Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,597
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    DAinDC
    Newest Member
    DAinDC
    Joined

NNE Winter Part 3


mreaves

Recommended Posts

Yeah, I guess the question then is how far north does that make it and where is the cut-off.  There should be subsidence north of that in a pretty sharp gradient.  We'll probably see the snow totals under played for someone but then likewise north of that band will be over-played. 

This week could put me officially over the edge, with today's system coming north just enough to hit SNE and the next system slipping south so they jackpot. I have to say that the chorus of "Don't worry, fronto will save NNE" isn't as comforting as it would have been prior to the last big system which buried SNE and completely whiffed up here. Before that one we were told not to worry about modeled QPF trends. And while there'd been a steady SWFE drumbeat on the midweek system, it's now looking more and more like a Miller B that's racing off to our south.  I'm not saying that we'll be shut out this time, but it is discouraging to once again be relegated to the fringes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 2.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I noticed something strange yesterday. Decided to ski Wildcat. Left my house in Bartlett with 1-2 in of fresh snow, and assumed that Wildcat, being higher in elevation and further north, would have gotten a similar or possibly greater amount. Instead, it seems that the Pinkham notch area got rain or wet snow. How is that possible??? Is some strange microclimate issue at play? Just curious... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I noticed something strange yesterday. Decided to ski Wildcat. Left my house in Bartlett with 1-2 in of fresh snow, and assumed that Wildcat, being higher in elevation and further north, would have gotten a similar or possibly greater amount. Instead, it seems that the Pinkham notch area got rain or wet snow. How is that possible??? Is some strange microclimate issue at play? Just curious... 

 

It was probably precipitation intensity driven?  How many miles away is Bartlett from Pinkham?  You may have just gotten into a better band or something at your house.

 

Very similar to the system in December when S.VT up to C.NH and S.ME had like 6-8" of heavy wet snow, while it rained to the summits up here in northern VT.  The snow was all intensity and banding related and if you just had prolonged light precip, it was rain no matter the elevation or latitude.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was probably precipitation intensity driven?  How many miles away is Bartlett from Pinkham?  You may have just gotten into a better band or something at your house.

 

Very similar to the system in December when S.VT up to C.NH and S.ME had like 6-8" of heavy wet snow, while it rained to the summits up here in northern VT.  The snow was all intensity and banding related and if you just had prolonged light precip, it was rain no matter the elevation or latitude.

Might be... it's 15 miles, going from 800 feet in Bartlett (South of Mt Washington) to about 2000 ft at the base at Wildcat (East of Mt Washington). It was definitely very strange!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12z gfs now under 0.30" qpf for AUG/RUM/WVL for midweek.  Still time for movement but the trend is toward WWA, at best.  The late weekend storm is also undergoing qpf reduction run by run.  Nice run for my old NNJ homeland, though - 3 events for 25-30" verbatim (including the one in progress there.)  lol

 

GFS is also the model with the least qpf and a shade south of the other guidance, Euro has been stead fast and has over .50" i think qpf here

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here lets pick up the spirits a bit and give some of you something to at least look at for now, And lol at some writing off the storm for next Monday 7 days out

 

StormTotalSnowFcst.png

Lines up with the BTV map I posted above.  I'm not really all that down.  I'd like to see this one come in at the top end of my forecasted range 6" or 8" and then get another one of at least the same.  I don't need the big totals as long as I can a bit of snowpack built up, I'll be happy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lines up with the BTV map I posted above.  I'm not really all that down.  I'd like to see this one come in at the top end of my forecasted range 6" or 8" and then get another one of at least the same.  I don't need the big totals as long as I can a bit of snowpack built up, I'll be happy. 

 

Haha, well yeah that would of course work, those are huge totals for this year.  6-8" would be the biggest single day snowfall event of the season for me, and then if we got another one of at least that much after it, that would be epic for this winter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Here is the BTV snowfall map for Wednesday.  Sort of meh looking but I will take what I can get at this point.

 

03FEB14B.jpg

 

 

 

I’ve added this afternoon’s updated advisories and projected accumulations maps from BTV below – Our current point forecast calls for accumulations in the 3 to 5 inch range, which could make it the largest event of this year depending on where it falls in that range.

 

03FEB14C.jpg

 

03FEB14D.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’ve added this afternoon’s updated advisories and projected accumulations maps from BTV below – Our current point forecast calls for accumulations in the 3 to 5 inch range, which could make it the largest event of this year depending on where it falls in that range.

 

My P&C calls for 4"-8" from Tuesday night through Wednesday night.  Like I said, I'll take it and be happy in this winter of my discontent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lines up with the BTV map I posted above. I'm not really all that down. I'd like to see this one come in at the top end of my forecasted range 6" or 8" and then get another one of at least the same. I don't need the big totals as long as I can a bit of snowpack built up, I'll be happy.

Same don't need to jack, Just enough to ride on

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’ve added this afternoon’s updated advisories and projected accumulations maps from BTV below – Our current point forecast calls for accumulations in the 3 to 5 inch range, which could make it the largest event of this year depending on where it falls in that range.

 

03FEB14C.jpg

 

03FEB14D.jpg

The new forecast map brings the 6-8 inch band into Addison County, and introduces a higher 10-14 range into southern Vermont.  Earlier, I named it a borderline plow event.  If this verifies or pulls even further north, this is a definitive plow event for Addison County, and a bonifide school closure (compared to when schools closed on Thursday morning ahead of a forecasted 4-8" event over a 48 hour period, yeesh).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Where has ekuasepinniW been? Cant remember the last time I saw a post from him. Just was looking at the GYX snow map and saw the lakes region and started to wonder.

 

Will be nice to get some snow on top of the stuff that used to be snow that's been on the ground since early Dec. Feels cold out tonight after the last few nights.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Event totals: 0.3” Snow/Trace L.E.

 

When I went out back to confirm the snow depth at the stake this morning, I was greeted by some surprise snowfall.  It was actually partly cloudy out, but the air was filled with snow globe flakes floating down in that ever so slow and leisurely way they do.  Checking the board revealed 0.3” of fluff, but it contained less than 0.01” of liquid, so it will go down as a trace.

 

The snow is still going, with a similar tenth of an inch down at least – there’s not much mention of the event in the BTV NWS discussion, but it sounds like it’s from the low cloud deck that is hanging out in the Champlain Valley area spilling over toward us, because indeed the clear sky and stars that I see are off to the east, and overhead and to the west is dark:

 

FOR A PORTION OF THE MORNING...MUCH OF THE CVLY AND POINTS WEST INTO THE ST LAW VALLEY WILL CONTINUE TO SEE MEANDERING LOW CLD DECK THAT HAS BEEN OVER AREA THRU THE NIGHT. SLOW DISSIPATION OF THESE CLDS WILL GIVE WAY TO PSUNNY/MSUNNY CONDITIONS. SOME FLURRY ACTIVITY POSSIBLE WITH NO ACCUM POTENTIAL IN THE AFOREMENTIONED AREA THRU MID MORNING.

 

Details from the 6:00 A.M. Waterbury observations:

 

New Snow: 0.3 inches

New Liquid: Trace

Sky: Light Snow/Flurries (5-10 mm flakes)

Snow at the stake: 5.0 inches

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Event totals: 0.3” Snow/Trace L.E.

 

When I went out back to confirm the snow depth at the stake this morning, I was greeted by some surprise snowfall.  It was actually partly cloudy out, but the air was filled with snow globe flakes floating down in that ever so slow and leisurely way they do.  Checking the board revealed 0.3” of fluff, but it contained less than 0.01” of liquid, so it will go down as a trace.

 

The snow is still going, with a similar tenth of an inch down at least – there’s not much mention of the event in the BTV NWS discussion, but it sounds like it’s from the low cloud deck that is hanging out in the Champlain Valley area spilling over toward us, because indeed the clear sky and stars that I see are off to the east, and overhead and to the west is dark:

 

FOR A PORTION OF THE MORNING...MUCH OF THE CVLY AND POINTS WEST INTO THE ST LAW VALLEY WILL CONTINUE TO SEE MEANDERING LOW CLD DECK THAT HAS BEEN OVER AREA THRU THE NIGHT. SLOW DISSIPATION OF THESE CLDS WILL GIVE WAY TO PSUNNY/MSUNNY CONDITIONS. SOME FLURRY ACTIVITY POSSIBLE WITH NO ACCUM POTENTIAL IN THE AFOREMENTIONED AREA THRU MID MORNING.

 

Details from the 6:00 A.M. Waterbury observations:

 

New Snow: 0.3 inches

New Liquid: Trace

Sky: Light Snow/Flurries (5-10 mm flakes)

Snow at the stake: 5.0 inches

 

 

 

Same exact thing going on up here... the stars are out but yet it is snowing big fluffy flakes.  Very odd to see the sky very clearly and yet have it snowing out and a little more than just flurries.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...