Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,611
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

2014 Global Temperatures


StudentOfClimatology

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Starting to look like a breed of 2009 and 1997 as far as the orientation of the warm pool goes, only we're months ahead of where we were during both of those cases..in fact the the coupling between perhaps the strongest KW in modern history, and the various atmospheric parameters (Walker cell migration, MJO, and the QBO transition to negative which will cool the equatorial stratosphere) is unprecedented since our observations of this stuff began.

I think this entails something significant...exactly what..I'm not sure. Hopefully this isn't another abrupt climate shift reminiscent of the early Holocene..that would not be good for humanity..

 

It will just increase the baseline by another 5/100th of a degree C.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Weather bell dailies still hovering around +.35c since last update month is at +.061c ill try to do update at least once a week.

 

 

Thanks really appreciate at it man.

 

 

I expected March to get warm the 2nd half but not this much.

 

The Russian torch dies down towards the end of the month so that should offer some relief on the global scale. 

 

 

The AAO really goes very positive too which should cool down Antarctica as well.

 

However in return the Southern Ocean should warm up + ENSO warming + NH Spring warming.

 

 

GISS had a .60C+ last year for March and a .48C+ for April. 

 

The way it looks right now I'd say March will be around .65C+.

 

AMSU channel 6 temps are now warmest on record for this date.  So there is definitely lower troposphere warming going on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks really appreciate at it man.

 

 

I expected March to get warm the 2nd half but not this much.

 

The Russian torch dies down towards the end of the month so that should offer some relief on the global scale. 

 

 

The AAO really goes very positive too which should cool down Antarctica as well.

 

However in return the Southern Ocean should warm up + ENSO warming + NH Spring warming.

 

 

GISS had a .60C+ last year for March and a .48C+ for April. 

 

The way it looks right now I'd say March will be around .65C+.

 

AMSU channel 6 temps are now warmest on record for this date.  So there is definitely lower troposphere warming going on.

No problem month should push over +.100c within a few days on wxbell.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is pretty crazy.

 

There is a cold shot coming over the CONUS which will help off set some of the warming.

 

amsu channel 6 temps had another big jump today.  Well out in front now.

 

which is not surprising given the ridging over Eurasia and the warm ssta.

Definitely a sustained warm. I don't recall Weatherbell CFS ever hovering beyond 0.30c for more than a few days. Makes you wonder how warm it will become under a weak or moderate el nino condition.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't recall Weatherbell CFS ever hovering beyond 0.30c for more than a few days. Makes you wonder how warm it will become under a weak or moderate el nino condition.

Looks like the last time we saw sustained of +.3K was back in 2010, probably related to that big El Niño..so it's been awhile.

It'll be interesting to see how long this warm spell lasts, and whether or not it's the start of something more significant:

cfsr_t2m_recent.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is probably caused IMO. It was about 10 years of AGW upper ocean warming in 2 years. 

 

It would have taken close to a decade for the heat to dissipate from the upper ocean whether the earth was in an imbalance in not. In fact, the positive energy imbalance meant that we returned to equilibrium faster because on the one hand the heat was dissipating naturally and on the other, AGW was increasing RF, and eventually the two met in the middle. It would have taken even longer to cool back down to a pre-1998 state.

 

Yeah that was kinda my point.  I guess if you want to say that the 1998 ENSO sped up the warming in the oceans over that period of then I'm fine with it but I have a problem with that being referred to as causing a climate shift.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

These are amsu channel 6 temps from 2002-2014.


03/20 -999.000  237.360  237.439 237.337 237.267  237.191  236.896  237.092  237.769  236.956  237.202  237.175  237.528

 

 

I was wrong about it being the warmest I overlooked 2010.  It is 2nd to 2010 and is still on a upward trend attm.

 

 

March and April of 2010 were .88C and .83C on GISS.  This year March won't be anywhere near that.  But it's looking likely to be around .70C+ on GISS even with the very cool start to March. 

 

The Trimonthly ONI index average before March of 2010 was 1.5C+.  February isn't out as far as I can see but Dec was -0.4C and Jan was -0.7C.  Feb will probably be around -0.6C.

 

Last year March was .60C and April was .48C on GISS.  So 2013 and 2014 are tied. But 2014 is about to pull way ahead by the time we get threw April.

 

 

 

soi30.png

 

 

Eurasian Snow Cover is in terrible shape.  The current anomalies are pretty large themselves but they do little justice to how bad the snow pack over there is.

 

NA attm has a surplus but it won't stay that way or stay in a manner to help off set the Eurasian yearly decline.

 

Last April had a great pattern in NA to stay relatively cool that is not looking anywhere near the case this year.

 

2014081.png

 

 

The arctic is progged to continue to blow torch.  Luckily Eurasia is expected to cool off.  Maybe this will help the snow cover not get decimated before we barely get into April.

 

 

gfsanom_np.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah that was kinda my point. I guess if you want to say that the 1998 ENSO sped up the warming in the oceans over that period of then I'm fine with it but I have a problem with that being referred to as causing a climate shift.

Skierinvermont is correct, it did cause a major shift in the Hadley and Ferrel Circulations around the globe. That is undeniable.

It doesn't take much at all to force abrupt climate change, looking at history. If you don't think shifts in ENSO and the related tropical forcings were part of the great climate swings of the early-middle Holocene, what do you think caused them?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

T2_anom_satellite1.jpg

Just as I would expect with the northern hemisphere and artic warming the most and the southern hemisphere and antartic not nearly as much due to much less land area with more ocean with strong cold currents around antartica soaking up the extra heat and keeping the antartic cut off from the rest of the worlds climate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just as I would expect with the northern hemisphere and artic warming the most and the southern hemisphere and antartic not nearly as much due to much less land area with more ocean with strong cold currents around antartica soaking up the extra heat and keeping the antartic cut off from the rest of the worlds climate.

Interesting post, the Antarctica region experiences various cycles like most other areas. It has been warm and cold this year, up to 1.30c at times and as low as 0.20c. It seems the Arctic continues to torch more every year while the Antarctic hangs around 1.00c above baseline. There is definitely a growing contrast between temperatures in the Northern and Southern hemisphere. 

 

Southern Hemisphere will require more time to respond to CO2 and other GHG forcings as it contains a larger amount of water surface area.

 

Keep in mind, these temperature anomalies are derived on a 1979-2000 baseline. In reality, the arctic is actually at record temperatures and is about 5c warmer than it was during pre-industrial times as of March 25th. This would be massive and unprecedented on any time scale outside of a human lifetime.

 

Good news is that things look to cool down a bit globally next week, including the arctic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting post, the Antarctica region experiences various cycles like most other areas. It has been warm and cold this year, up to 1.30c at times and as low as 0.20c. It seems the Arctic continues to torch more every year while the Antarctic hangs around 1.00c above baseline. There is definitely a growing contrast between temperatures in the Northern and Southern hemisphere. 

 

Southern Hemisphere will require more time to respond to CO2 and other GHG forcings as it contains a larger amount of water surface area.

 

Keep in mind, these temperature anomalies are derived on a 1979-2000 baseline. In reality, the arctic is actually at record temperatures and is about 5c warmer than it was during pre-industrial times as of March 25th. This would be massive and unprecedented on any time scale outside of a human lifetime.

 

Good news is that things look to cool down a bit globally next week, including the arctic.

 

Why is 5C above average in the arctic on March 25 massive and unprecedented? That's just a single day. What's unprecedented is receiving such anomalies for an entire month and the ~2.5C of warming that has occurred since 1900. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why is 5C above average in the arctic on March 25 massive and unprecedented? That's just a single day. What's unprecedented is receiving such anomalies for an entire month and the ~2.5C of warming that has occurred since 1900. 

Seems to be a record for the date, forgive me for not being able to pull up the data to prove it. Indeed I agree with your latter points about the arctic situation. I recall some studies calling for a +13C rise by 2100 in the arctic, seems a bit conservative when you factor in fast and slow feedbacks.

 

http://www.rtcc.org/2014/02/21/arctic-temperatures-could-increase-by-13c-by-2100/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why is 5C above average in the arctic on March 25 massive and unprecedented? That's just a single day. What's unprecedented is receiving such anomalies for an entire month and the ~2.5C of warming that has occurred since 1900.

I assume you're referring to the rate of warming since 1900?

Current temperatures in the Arctic are not (yet) remarkably warm compared to the early-middle Holocene. Though at this rate it won't be long..maybe by 2050-2075:

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277379113004162?np=y

Arctic Ocean sea ice proxies generally suggest a reduction in sea ice during parts of the early and middle Holocene (∼6000–10,000 years BP) compared to present day conditions. This sea ice minimum has been attributed to the northern hemisphere Early Holocene Insolation Maximum (EHIM) associated with Earth's orbital cycles. Here we investigate the transient effect of insolation variations during the final part of the last glaciation and the Holocene by means of continuous climate simulations with the coupled atmosphere–sea ice–ocean column model CCAM. We show that the increased insolation during EHIM has the potential to push the Arctic Ocean sea ice cover into a regime dominated by seasonal ice, i.e. ice free summers. The strong sea ice thickness response is caused by the positive sea ice albedo feedback. Studies of the GRIP ice cores and high latitude North Atlantic sediment cores show that the Bølling–Allerød period (c. 12,700–14,700 years BP) was a climatically unstable period in the northern high latitudes and we speculate that this instability may be linked to dual stability modes of the Arctic sea ice cover characterized by e.g. transitions between periods with and without perennial sea ice cover.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2014GL059520/abstract

 

The influence of different El Niño types on global average temperature

 

 

 

Abstract

[1] The El Niño/ Southern Oscillation (ENSO) is known to influence surface temperatures worldwide. El Niño conditions are thought to lead to anomalously warm global average surface temperature, absent other forcings. Recent research has identified distinct possible types of El Niño events based on the location of peak sea surface temperature anomalies. Here we analyze the relationship between the type of El Niño event and the global average temperature anomaly, using three historical temperature datasets. Separating El Niño events into types reveals that the global average surface temperatures are anomalously warm during and after traditional Eastern Pacific El Niño events, but not Central Pacific or Mixed events. Historical analysis indicated that slowdowns in the rate of global surface warming since the late-1800 s may be related to decadal variability in the frequency of different types of El Niño events.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...