RobbieL241 Posted January 1, 2014 Share Posted January 1, 2014 Reasonsble. All gonna come down to if the Rgem is right in keeping us in the snow all day Wasn't reasonable when I put up on another board where it automatically changes his name to "idiot weatherman" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CT Rain Posted January 1, 2014 Share Posted January 1, 2014 probably a prolonged period of freezing drizzle instead...with just a few peeks of sun lol. Spitting snow grains with a bit of sun. Misery. I'd rather sunny at 50F. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weatherwiz Posted January 1, 2014 Share Posted January 1, 2014 Looking forward to some thundersnow potential with this...should have a period where thundersnow is a definite possibility given the degree of lift associated with the system and some elevated instability Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damage In Tolland Posted January 1, 2014 Share Posted January 1, 2014 Looking forward to some thundersnow potential with this...should have a period where thundersnow is a definite possibility given the degree of lift associated with the system and some elevated instabilityI don't see potential of tsnow anywhere. This isn't that kind of setup. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weathafella Posted January 1, 2014 Author Share Posted January 1, 2014 I don't see potential of tsnow anywhere. This isn't that kind of setup. Convective bands with oes could do it as they often do in les areas. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RobbieL241 Posted January 1, 2014 Share Posted January 1, 2014 I don't see potential of tsnow anywhere. This isn't that kind of setup. I Agree. There really isn't much of a tight thermal gradient with this storm to cause that sort of thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted January 1, 2014 Share Posted January 1, 2014 I don't see potential of tsnow anywhere. This isn't that kind of setup.incredible gradient, bet EMA has a shot Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted January 1, 2014 Share Posted January 1, 2014 I Agree. There really isn't much of a tight thermal gradient with this storm to cause that sort of thing.Lol have you looked at anything? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cut Posted January 1, 2014 Share Posted January 1, 2014 I am with Ginxy on this one. .. The gradient that is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamesnichols1989 Posted January 1, 2014 Share Posted January 1, 2014 Lol have you looked at anything? I know right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DomNH Posted January 1, 2014 Share Posted January 1, 2014 Looking at the twisterdata maps, the GFS QPF is like .6''-.7'' for most of SNE outside extreme eastern MA and the Cape which is more and CT which is less. Seems pretty reasonable to me and I wouldn't really expect any more for most of us, so I'd think 9-10'' is probably the upper limit for a lot of us outside of Eastern MA unless we see wall to wall 20:1. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moneypitmike Posted January 1, 2014 Share Posted January 1, 2014 Welll--I give wggb credit for not letting their maps go stale. I think this is the 4th one of the day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted January 1, 2014 Share Posted January 1, 2014 I think NWS Boston and NYC have a great handle on this so far. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weatherwiz Posted January 1, 2014 Share Posted January 1, 2014 I don't see potential of tsnow anywhere. This isn't that kind of setup. I Agree. There really isn't much of a tight thermal gradient with this storm to cause that sort of thing. Thundersnow potential is definitely there...not a signal for widespread potential but it's there Decent amount of VV's being forecasted at 700mb...700-500mb lapse rates will also be increasing up over 6-6.5 C/KM which isn't bad. Like Jerry and Steve said...best shot would probably be eastern MA Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weathafella Posted January 1, 2014 Author Share Posted January 1, 2014 New England is well below freezing. DC is in the 40s. Philly is now 37. Gradient. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scoob40 Posted January 1, 2014 Share Posted January 1, 2014 Looks spot on for the valley going south to north.Looks the best for the Hippy Hippy Shake. Welll--I give wggb credit for not letting their maps go stale. I think this is the 4th one of the day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
powderfreak Posted January 1, 2014 Share Posted January 1, 2014 Convective bands with oes could do it as they often do in les areas. Yeah that would have to be one heck of an OES band to get thundersnow. When it happens in the LES areas that's like 6+ per hour and 40dbz. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Typhoon Tip Posted January 1, 2014 Share Posted January 1, 2014 Hey Kevin you guys getting any flurries down there ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damage In Tolland Posted January 1, 2014 Share Posted January 1, 2014 Hey Kevin you guys getting any flurries down there ?Nah. Not yet. Will take a few more hours to moisten Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
esmango Posted January 1, 2014 Share Posted January 1, 2014 I think I'm sitting pretty with this storm, live in East Bridgewater and work in Hanover. Expecting a 12+. Feeling Tollandish. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tropopause_Fold Posted January 1, 2014 Share Posted January 1, 2014 Hey Kevin you guys getting any flurries down there ?Nah. Not yet. Will take a few more hours to moisten Keep working at it. Takes time when you get older Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorEastermass128 Posted January 1, 2014 Share Posted January 1, 2014 Keep working at it. Takes time when you get olderNow that was good. 8-12" final call. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
powderfreak Posted January 1, 2014 Share Posted January 1, 2014 Here comes the cold from the north...MSS in upstate NY already -12/-19F at 6pm. Wonder if they can pick up a couple inches tomorrow under -10F temps. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CHIPPENSHILL Posted January 2, 2014 Share Posted January 2, 2014 Flurries here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damage In Tolland Posted January 2, 2014 Share Posted January 2, 2014 Keep working at it. Takes time when you get olderCould you describe in detail what you mean? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damage In Tolland Posted January 2, 2014 Share Posted January 2, 2014 Flurries here.Where is there? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CHIPPENSHILL Posted January 2, 2014 Share Posted January 2, 2014 Bristol CT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted January 2, 2014 Share Posted January 2, 2014 8-10 for you would be my call. Exactly, but he is close to much more, just inside 128. 8-15" is a hell of a range though I guess it covers the meso jackpots and subsidence zones well. The problem is a lot of the public only remembers the high end of the ranges. This. Everyone keeps criticizing my 8-10" call for mby, yet Harv puts up an 8-15" RANGE, and everyone strokes their keyboard in awe of how "bullish" he is. New Flash: Harv agrees with me!! He's an on-air-met, and is not going to illustrate mesoscale screw jobs on his map, but psss....guess what, the 8" accounts for those. He'd probably agree with me that the area just west of that oes is prime to see the lower end...aka mby. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OceanStWx Posted January 2, 2014 Share Posted January 2, 2014 I think NWS Boston and NYC have a great handle on this so far. Ouch Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clinch Leatherwood Posted January 2, 2014 Share Posted January 2, 2014 Wake me up in 3.5 hours. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.