Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,606
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    ArlyDude
    Newest Member
    ArlyDude
    Joined

January Pattern Discussion


NorthArlington101

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

It's modeled but unlikely. Seems borderline. Probably a snowstorm. But I don't like the redevelopment so far north and inland. Verbatim still 3-4" for nw burbs. Less in DC where we mix. Maybe 2-3".

careful with your wording lol...3-4 in NW burbs and 2-3 in DC isnt a small hit anymore in this day and age

Link to comment
Share on other sites

some people shouldnt be allowed to post model information until the run is over. Terrible tease

Didn't mean to delete. Stupid iPhone. 3-4" for nw burbs 2-3" for DC with mixing. Not liking secondary developing so far north and inland. Huge screw job potential

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In that case we shouldn't start a thread until a few hours into the storm, at the earliest. This has screwjob written all over it.

Gfs solution is fine wirh the vort pass and low development. I think either is equally likely. If screwjob potential becomes likely then a screwjob thread it is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree that this solution is unusually and unlikely given the features and flow in front. Just another possibility and not cold snow verbatim.

Parallel redevelopment is unusual. Though the interaction makes it possible. Usually a low occluding in Kentucky isn't going to pop a secondary over the northern neck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gfs solution is fine wirh the vort pass and low development. I think either is equally likely. If screwjob potential becomes likely then a screwjob thread it is.

Miller Bs really suck down here.  I'm not liking that there are now 3 major models showing some type of variation of a Miller B.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Miller Bs really suck down here. I'm not liking that there are now 3 major models showing some type of variation of a Miller B.

They can be ok if the primary is weak and/or we get front thumped. Usually there is a nasty dry slot

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm hoping the press of arctic air will cause that....way too far out there now to do anything but figure there are a handful of options on the table.

There are still lots of options.  We need the confluence to hold a little better to weaken the primary and then get the low develop far enough south to get us.  I think a miller b scenario is the most likely one but not with enough confidence to rule out last night's euro. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't recall we had a redeveloper like that off the NC coast.....96?

We've had plenty. Even as far south as charleston. We need the primary further east. There are a number of ways to get that. Or we just need a 0z solution. Lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We need the primary further east. I think if we get that we do better on both ends. I wouldn't give up on a low off the Carolinas.

yep...still time for adjustments but we have seen this movie many times with regards to Miller B's. Euro gives us a quick nice burst but overall its a garbage run for us. Ready to drive lol?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yep...still time for adjustments but we have seen this movie many times with regards to Miller B's. Euro gives us a quick nice burst but overall its a garbage run for us. Ready to drive lol?

2-3" is fine. And probably the most realistic in terms of snow. I haven't looked at analogs today but what we've seen over the last few days are almost no analogs with big storms. Pattern doesn't support it. I'd be surprised by a cold 4-6" event. Tricky 1-3" event seems most probable or just a complete bust

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...