Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,609
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

December 21-22nd Winter Storm Part 2


Chicago Storm

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Yeah, I definitely have seen that. I guess it's just how the model outputs snow, or thinks it's snow in the case of water equivalent

From everything I have looked at in wxbell it looks like they use any 850mb temp less than 3 C for all snow. That is why snowfall amounts are so high and so far south.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Skilling is on in 5 minutes. I'm confident he's not going to say Sunday will be sunny.  

 

EDIT: The damn Bulls are on instead. Oh well. 

I thought it looked like an odd forecast. Looking around the web, no one is forecasting 23 and sunny for Sunday.  But then, Skilling did pick up the GHD storm a good 24 hours before anyone else, when the GFS was still showing it as a low cutting across the South, and heading up the coast.  Not saying that is what he is doing here, but, it really seems out of place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

0z EURO holds the final nail.

Yeah, I'm getting the sense that snow will be tough, if not impossible, to come by. Even sampling of the northern piece of energy won't be enough (southern piece is too strong). However, that might be enough to have all of the precip fall as freezing rain in Toronto instead of it changing to rain during the day on Sunday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From everything I have looked at in wxbell it looks like they use any 850mb temp less than 3 C for all snow. That is why snowfall amounts are so high and so far south.

Nah, its definitely water equivalent, I asked him one time, and plotted it myself once and they matched up. I just don't know who to actually believe, all model sites' snowfall maps are different from one another.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I haven't read many of the pages for part 2 of this system because of work restraints, but I did follow most of part 1, it was a fascinating read, however something was really eating at me but I didn't know what it was until I woke up this morning and the light bulb went off, but didn't have time to post it.  And that was the weakening of the negative EPO which should slow the intrusion of cold air at the mid levels and allow this storm to intensify as it moves towards the lakes.  This is well depicted by the 18/12z run of the GGEM, notice where it forms a H7 low over NE IA and SE MN as shown by the wind barbs.

 

http://grib2.com/gem/CONUS_GEM_700_GPHTMPRH_102HR.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

NAM text surface temps are probably a bunch of gobbledygook, but that's some nice cold rain for LAF. With 850 temps peaking at 11.4C. WAA out of control. Crap load of rain. 3 hour totals/intervals are impressive. 

 

66 12/21 18Z 32 29 194 6 0.01 0.00 549 561 6.5 -15.5 1014 100 014OVC391 0.0 12.2
69 12/21 21Z 33 32 148 2 0.10 0.00 552 561 6.6 -14.9 1012 100 -RA 011OVC389 0.0 4.7
72 12/22 00Z 33 33 59 7 0.24 0.00 553 562 6.4 -14.5 1011 100 RA 012OVC372 0.0 3.8
75 12/22 03Z 34 34 57 7 0.72 0.00 555 563 6.5 -12.3 1009 100 +RA 009OVC367 0.0 2.3
78 12/22 06Z 34 33 56 10 0.63 0.00 558 561 10.6 -12.5 1004 100 RA 009OVC393 0.0 3.0
81 12/22 09Z 35 35 20 9 0.67 0.11 560 560 11.4 -11.4 999 100 TSRA 006OVC395 0.0 0.9
84 12/22 12Z 34 34 61 4 0.46 0.09 557 557 10.8 -13.8 1000 100 TSRA 008OVC336 0.0 2.3

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

NAM text surface temps are probably a bunch of gobbledygook, but that's some nice cold rain for LAF. With 850 temps peaking at 11.4C. WAA out of control. Crap load of rain. 3 hour totals/intervals are impressive. 

 

66 12/21 18Z 32 29 194 6 0.01 0.00 549 561 6.5 -15.5 1014 100 014OVC391 0.0 12.2

69 12/21 21Z 33 32 148 2 0.10 0.00 552 561 6.6 -14.9 1012 100 -RA 011OVC389 0.0 4.7

72 12/22 00Z 33 33 59 7 0.24 0.00 553 562 6.4 -14.5 1011 100 RA 012OVC372 0.0 3.8

75 12/22 03Z 34 34 57 7 0.72 0.00 555 563 6.5 -12.3 1009 100 +RA 009OVC367 0.0 2.3

78 12/22 06Z 34 33 56 10 0.63 0.00 558 561 10.6 -12.5 1004 100 RA 009OVC393 0.0 3.0

81 12/22 09Z 35 35 20 9 0.67 0.11 560 560 11.4 -11.4 999 100 TSRA 006OVC395 0.0 0.9

84 12/22 12Z 34 34 61 4 0.46 0.09 557 557 10.8 -13.8 1000 100 TSRA 008OVC336 0.0 2.3

 

 

00z GGEM rolling in is still much quicker to bring precip to our area.   Hmmm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...