Baroclinic Zone Posted December 16, 2013 Share Posted December 16, 2013 NAM has TTs in the 50s. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Typhoon Tip Posted December 16, 2013 Share Posted December 16, 2013 One interesting trend you've missed is that this run has a small but clear CCB generated sooner, and causes an extra 3-hourly interval of .1 to .25" QPF into NE Mass. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamesnichols1989 Posted December 16, 2013 Share Posted December 16, 2013 HYA sees more than 4" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamesnichols1989 Posted December 16, 2013 Share Posted December 16, 2013 NAM has TTs in the 50s. WOW Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
danstorm Posted December 16, 2013 Share Posted December 16, 2013 They're not part of the FWC network. But ironically I just looked at snow numbers on the met guidance. BDL: 4 ORH/PVD/PYM: 6 Hya: 4 BOS/bed: 8 Care to hook a brother up with LGA, NYC, JFK? Also, I am absolutely AMAZED at the cold modeled for NE... just unreal and it's still pre solstice... 1989 type stuff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
danstorm Posted December 16, 2013 Share Posted December 16, 2013 Setup reminds me of the event post Blizzard of 2005 when 1-3/2-4 was forecast, the low bombed, and we (I was in Boston at the time) got roughly 8" of fluff. What a period that was, cold as hell too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ono Posted December 16, 2013 Share Posted December 16, 2013 relying on ratios temps low teens, good lift saturated column, 20-1 stuff relying on ratios like 20:1 can be trouble. Case in point: northern VT today. 20:1 ratios were forecasted, but things came in more like 10-12:1. Just a thought. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Typhoon Tip Posted December 16, 2013 Share Posted December 16, 2013 NAM has TTs in the 50s. It had 50+ TTs leading up to last night. Thunder verified. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weatherwiz Posted December 16, 2013 Share Posted December 16, 2013 NAM has TTs in the 50s. Low? Mid? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weathafella Posted December 16, 2013 Share Posted December 16, 2013 Care to hook a brother up with LGA, NYC, JFK? Also, I am absolutely AMAZED at the cold modeled for NE... just unreal and it's still pre solstice... 1989 type stuff. Hi Dan...we miss you up here. All 3 stations 1 in one period and 2 in the next. Decent but not warning level. But this is trending south in the vm so who knows? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamesnichols1989 Posted December 16, 2013 Share Posted December 16, 2013 I would love to see thundersnow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUNNAWAYICEBERG Posted December 16, 2013 Share Posted December 16, 2013 I would love to see thundersnow. agree...its prob the sexiest weather phenomena. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
danstorm Posted December 16, 2013 Share Posted December 16, 2013 Hi Dan...we miss you up here. All 3 stations 1 in one period and 2 in the next. Decent but not warning level. But this is trending south in the vm so who knows? Miss you too, Jerry and co! Miss sticking out into the Atlantic, too... these clips can be fun for you guys. Expecting 2-3" here, but these things are fickle beasts... have been screwed by clippers more times than I can remember being surprised by them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamesnichols1989 Posted December 16, 2013 Share Posted December 16, 2013 agree...its prob the sexiest weather phenomena. Agreed, Also this first shortwave over Saskatchewan means business. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamesnichols1989 Posted December 16, 2013 Share Posted December 16, 2013 Miss you too, Jerry and co! Miss sticking out into the Atlantic, too... these clips can be fun for you guys. Expecting 2-3" here, but these things are fickle beasts... have been screwed by clippers more times than I can remember being surprised by them. New York has to rely on too many things to happen for a decent sized snowstorm for you guys. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Typhoon Tip Posted December 16, 2013 Share Posted December 16, 2013 Setup reminds me of the event post Blizzard of 2005 when 1-3/2-4 was forecast, the low bombed, and we (I was in Boston at the time) got roughly 8" of fluff. What a period that was, cold as hell too. That event comes in 2nd place as my most hated event of all time. I lived in Middlesex Co Mass, and we had a gravity wave induced meso-band of boning in that region. 6" total. No where close to a blizzard verified there despite the warnings. I recall waking at 5 am to a flurries and wondering what the f. The apex worst of all was that 1987 event that was Blizzard Watched some 3.5 days ahead of time because the certitude of NWS had a storm that would impact rivaling 1978, all the way into interior SNE. The tickers ran constant along the bottom of the television, for days, as every aspect imaginable that is consistent with big New England bombs was highlighted, ranging from CF, to high wind, deep snow, power-outages, choking death, you name it. Supposed to be THAT good. I remember half time at my High School b-ball game, walking out onto the entrance way to the gym, dripping sweat, to see large sleety snow balls beginning to mix in with the light rain. We were playing well that night, en route to a win, and it couldn't be any better. Beating our rival and then having a snow day(S) unfold. The game ends and I am all cleaned up and ready to walk home, and there was nothing falling. In fact, almost no wind. "Wtf." The sky had that butter-scotch glow, but it was black at the horizons. I remembered that look from Michigan, growing up, in that lake effect snow events usually "ended" that way. I put the the thought aside as being meaningless... until Harvey Leonard comes on later at 11pm. Imagine this in slow motion and a very deep voice: "I now think the heaviest snow will over the Cape and the Islands, with much less northwest of the City, city city ... city" No, no way. Not after that run-up. He has to be wrong. But the next morning broke to dim sun through cirrus and flurries. All of 1-2" of 30::1 ration snow in 9F cold was blowing around. AND, I got to walk to school in that cold. I will never forgive Walter Drag for that as his name was always pinned to the end of the ticker statements as they rolled across the bottom of the TV screen (just kidding Walt). I later learned while at UML that that storm fooled EVERY one. There was stunning model agreement 5 days out, and it held until about .1 days out, and then all the models shifted E. As it were, the Cape and Islands went to 20+ " of white-outs in 50mph winds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Typhoon Tip Posted December 16, 2013 Share Posted December 16, 2013 Low? Mid? Right because 51 means nothing and 52...whoa, look out - haha Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
danstorm Posted December 16, 2013 Share Posted December 16, 2013 That event comes in 2nd place as my most hated event of all time. I lived in Middlesex Co Mass, and we had a gravity wave induced meso-band of boning in that region. 6" total. No where close to a blizzard verified there despite the warnings. I recall waking at 5 am to a flurries and wondering what the f. The apex worst of all was that 1987 event that was Blizzard Watched some 3.5 days ahead of time because the certitude of NWS had a storm that would impact rivaling 1978, all the way into interior SNE. The tickers ran constant along the bottom of the television, for days, as every aspect imaginable that is consistent with big New England bombs was highlighted, ranging from CF, to high wind, deep snow, power-outages, choking death, you name it. Supposed to be THAT good. I remember half time at my High School b-ball game, walking out onto the entrance way to the gym, dripping sweat, to see large sleety snow balls beginning to mix in with the light rain. We were playing well that night, en route to a win, and it couldn't be any better. Beating our rival and then having a snow day(S) unfold. The game ends and I am all cleaned up and ready to walk home, and there was nothing falling. In fact, almost no wind. "Wtf." The sky had that butter-scotch glow, but it was black at the horizons. I remembered that look from Michigan, growing up, in that lake effect snow events usually "ended" that way. I put the the thought aside as being meaningless... until Harvey Leonard comes on later at 11pm. Imagine this in slow motion and a very deep voice: "I now think the heaviest snow will over the Cape and the Islands, with much less northwest of the City, city city ... city" No, no way. Not after that run-up. He has to be wrong. But the next morning broke to dim sun through cirrus and flurries. All of 1-2" of 30::1 ration snow in 9F cold was blowing around. AND, I got to walk to school in that cold. I will never forgive Walter Drag for that as his name was always pinned to the end of the ticker statements as they rolled across the bottom of the TV screen (just kidding Walt). I later learned while at UML that that storm fooled EVERY one. There was stunning model agreement 5 days out, and it held until about .1 days out, and then all the models shifted E. As it were, the Cape and Islands went to 20+ " of white-outs in 50mph winds. Translate it for me, because sometimes I can't process Tip-speak... you really got 6" of snow from the Blizzard of 2005? Didn't Chelmsford get that in one hour in the final collapsing death band? Boston verified 24-28, right? I was down at the South Shore in those winds at my buddy's summer house and had somewhere around 30, but it was impossible to tell with all the wind. One thing about those epic storms is that someone gets absolutely screwed at the fringes... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamesnichols1989 Posted December 16, 2013 Share Posted December 16, 2013 Tip, what do snowfall rates look like looking at the current models? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamesnichols1989 Posted December 16, 2013 Share Posted December 16, 2013 GFS might be dampening out the lead shortwave ahead of the main shortwave trough. I think that's what the 00z GFS shows at hour 21. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clinch Leatherwood Posted December 16, 2013 Share Posted December 16, 2013 RGEM cuts across SNE, best snows are pike north into SNH and SW ME. Good consensus as usual this year Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted December 16, 2013 Share Posted December 16, 2013 relying on ratios relying on ratios like 20:1 can be trouble. Case in point: northern VT today. 20:1 ratios were forecasted, but things came in more like 10-12:1. Just a thought. check the sounding and bufkit, Woodford was 18 inches, we know they did not have 1.4 qpf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CT Rain Posted December 16, 2013 Share Posted December 16, 2013 GFS not nearly as impressive as 18z. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorEastermass128 Posted December 16, 2013 Share Posted December 16, 2013 Translate it for me, because sometimes I can't process Tip-speak... you really got 6" of snow from the Blizzard of 2005? Didn't Chelmsford get that in one hour in the final collapsing death band? Boston verified 24-28, right? I was down at the South Shore in those winds at my buddy's summer house and had somewhere around 30, but it was impossible to tell with all the wind. One thing about those epic storms is that someone gets absolutely screwed at the fringes... I'm in Middlesex Co. too. Had 27" in Woburn. One of my favorite events of all time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORH_wxman Posted December 16, 2013 Author Share Posted December 16, 2013 Translate it for me, because sometimes I can't process Tip-speak... you really got 6" of snow from the Blizzard of 2005? Didn't Chelmsford get that in one hour in the final collapsing death band? Boston verified 24-28, right? I was down at the South Shore in those winds at my buddy's summer house and had somewhere around 30, but it was impossible to tell with all the wind. One thing about those epic storms is that someone gets absolutely screwed at the fringes... They didn't only get 6" in this blizzard of 2005. He must be thinking of anaother system. They got "only" about 12-14" at the lowest while surrounding areas got over 20 inches. The lowets total I can find in Middlesex country is 13.5"...but I could see maybe an ionch or two lower if somewhere got really scred ...MIDDLESEX COUNTY... MELROSE 36.0 116 PM 1/23 CAMBRIDGE 30.0 258 PM 1/23 WAKEFIELD 28.0 400 PM 1/23 BILLERICA 27.5 917 PM 1/23 NORTH WOBURN 27.5 224 AM 1/24 ST 6 FT DRIFTS BURLINGTON 27.0 850 AM 1/24 SOUTH CHELMSFORD 27.0 114 PM 1/23 EVERETT 26.5 300 PM 1/23 BELMONT 26.0 918 PM 1/23 ST WINCHESTER 25.8 1104 PM 1/23 EAST ARLINGTON 25.0 400 PM 1/23 NORTH BILLERICA 25.0 100 PM 1/23 WILMINGTON 25.0 137 PM 1/23 ST NORTH CHELMSFORD 24.0 440 PM 1/23 WOBURN 24.0 1040 PM 1/23 NATICK 22.0 700 AM 1/24 CO-OP OBSERVER WAYLAND 22.0 340 PM 1/23 WESTFORD 22.0 526 PM 1/23 MAYNARD 21.7 812 AM 1/24 LEXINGTON 21.0 249 PM 1/23 STONEHAM 21.0 123 PM 1/23 CARLISLE 20.8 1113 AM 1/23 AYER 20.3 330 PM 1/23 ST LITTLETON 19.0 241 PM 1/23 CHELMSFORD 18.5 219 PM 1/23 ST DRACUT 18.2 220 PM 1/23 ST DUNSTABLE 18.0 1245 PM 1/23 PEPPERELL 18.0 249 PM 1/23 TOWNSEND 18.0 402 PM 1/23 ST SHIRLEY 14.0 105 PM 1/23 HUDSON 13.5 300 PM 1/23 http://www.erh.noaa.gov/box/climate/snowrpts/snowstormJan2224-2005 Maybe he is thinking of PDII in Feb 2003? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clinch Leatherwood Posted December 16, 2013 Share Posted December 16, 2013 RGEM is 5 to 12 or 13mm across the region but some of it is rain along the south coast and maybe about the Braintree etc. Nice hit into SE NH and SW ME. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Typhoon Tip Posted December 16, 2013 Share Posted December 16, 2013 Translate it for me, because sometimes I can't process Tip-speak... you really got 6" of snow from the Blizzard of 2005? Didn't Chelmsford get that in one hour in the final collapsing death band? Boston verified 24-28, right? I was down at the South Shore in those winds at my buddy's summer house and had somewhere around 30, but it was impossible to tell with all the wind. One thing about those epic storms is that someone gets absolutely screwed at the fringes... 6, maybe 9," I remember it as pedestrian. I later saw a snow totals map and actually it was a narrow band from NE CT to Middlesex Co up in interior, eastern Mass that appeared affected by a negative node in the output. I can't find it tho - huh. Anyway, I appreciate the storm on whole as it brought the wood to many, and was fascinating, but it was irritating to go through such an anti-climax over having a blizzard warning in place. Wasn't that blizzard warned back that far? I can't recall that level of detail. I do remember the collapsing heavy deformation band... It brought the most snow of the event to Acton, and it was on par with that 6" in an hour you mentioned. But that was it, one, 1.5 hour period of S+ after a lot of hoopla. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Typhoon Tip Posted December 16, 2013 Share Posted December 16, 2013 I'm in Middlesex Co. too. Had 27" in Woburn. One of my favorite events of all time. Ah, Middlesex Co is huge... When you get into meso distributions of unfairness, Woburn and Acton can be in different galaxies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorEastermass128 Posted December 16, 2013 Share Posted December 16, 2013 GFS not nearly as impressive as 18z.Still a solid 1-4" as you move from west to east across SNE. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clinch Leatherwood Posted December 16, 2013 Share Posted December 16, 2013 Shouldn't this all be in the banter thread? Anyway 0z RGEM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.