Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,606
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    ArlyDude
    Newest Member
    ArlyDude
    Joined

December 14-15 Winter Storm Part Two


earthlight

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Look at it this way...if you really look at the details, the run is SIMILAR with many things EXCEPT qpf. It does this often....explodes with qpf. Point being...The NAM still shows snow to rain for the coastal cities...(except Boston)....though I will say the chances are there for 3-5" of it for NYC/EWR and PHL

It's also a decent amount colder

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is DARN cold out there right now (esp. up here in NW NJ).  Feels like an airmass that does not want to leave soon or easily. I can see the colder solutions winning.

What IS really encouraging is how much wetter the models are becoming (NAM may be crazy, but GFS was wetter as well).

 

Rooting for all of us!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's actually not a colder run comparing it to last run's frames 6hours ahead

 

Yes, and no. The GLARING difference tonight is that the NAM has a closed 925 and 850 low develop ALONG with the coastal. This could wind up (if correct) to be a huge player in the final thermal profile. If these low/mid level features develop then we are talking a whole different ballgame.

 

To add: The GFS does not have these features develop. The development of these features will aid in funneling back down the cold air from the N and NE.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is DARN cold out there right now (esp. up here in NW NJ). Feels like an airmass that does not want to leave soon or easily. I can see the colder solutions winning.

What IS really encouraging is how much wetter the models are becoming (NAM may be crazy, but GFS was wetter as well).

Rooting for all of us!

850mbs aren't gonna get above -10 lol. Soo cold

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the secondary development is faster and further south, then the 850mb low can develop further south and east then the coast gets more snow and less rain. The latest run of the NAM is showing this, if the trend in the models continue with the GFS and ECMWF than this might happen. We need to look at the 500MB level to see how strong the southern systems are and how much cold air damming the East Coast gets. So at this time it is still up in the air, but the trends of the last few runs do show a good snow potential for DCA to BOS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not all that rare..off the top of my head 2 KU events below...also 1888 and late feb 2010

 

 

The December 2010 storm has hits in BOS, ALB, and NYC... but all the rest seem to have been NYC/ALB hits and not BOS indicating more of a straight longitude rain/snow line...  So how rare are storms that hit NYC/ALB/BOS?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the secondary development is faster and further south, then the 850mb low can develop further south and east then the coast gets more snow and less rain. The latest run of the NAM is showing this, if the trend in the models continue with the GFS and ECMWF than this might happen. We need to look at the 500MB level to see how strong the southern systems are and how much cold air damming the East Coast gets. So at this time it is still up in the air, but the trends of the last few runs do show a good snow potential for DCA to BOS.

Exactly, the 850mb low prognosis has dramatically shifted from last night to tonight on the NAM. Last night there was no closed low at 850 and the mid level torch flowed unabated N. However, it should go without saying the effect that a closed 850 low off the coast would be a most encouraging development.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The original clown maps...

ontact: Evan Kuchera
0.5 degree isobaric GFS GRIB data from NCEP. 
The snowfall accumulation algorithm used on these charts is as follows:
1) Find the maximum temperature in the lowest 500 hPa in degrees K (MAXTMP)
2) If MAXTMP is greater than 271.16K, then the liquid equivalent ratio (RATIO) is 12.0 + 2.0*(271.16-MAXTMP)
3) If MAXTMP is less than 271.16K, then the liquid equivalent ratio (RATIO) is 12.0 + (271.16-MAXTMP)
The 3-hourly snowfall (SNOW) is RATIO multiplied by the three hour liquid precipitation total. The accumulated snowfall (ACCUM_SNOW) is the sum of all the SNOW values up to that projection time.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Exactly, the 850mb low prognosis has dramatically shifted from last night to tonight on the NAM. Last night there was no closed low at 850 and the mid level torch flowed unabated N. However, it should go without saying the effect that a closed 850 low off the coast would be a most encouraging development.

We just need to start seeing other models develop it besides the lousy NAM.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

NAM MTO for EWR has 800-850 around .5-.8 degrees from hour 54-hour 60, all other parts of the column are frozen. .80 precip falling within that time frame, most likely all frozen. 1.3 liquid precip over the course of the event. Not buying anything until a few more runs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

NAM MTO for EWR has 800-850 around .5-.8 degrees from hour 54-hour 60, all other parts of the column are frozen. .80 precip falling within that time frame, most likely all frozen. 1.3 liquid precip over the course of the event. Not buying anything until a few more runs.

The gfs showed almost the same thing except not as cold of course

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...