NeffsvilleWx Posted December 12, 2013 Share Posted December 12, 2013 Isn't the Nam overdoing the QPF? Also I'm wondering if the ratio's are going to be higher than what the models are predicting. Possibly, still waiting on the 12z GFS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I-83 BLIZZARD Posted December 12, 2013 Share Posted December 12, 2013 I ll take another 3 to 4! Apparently we hand a solid 1/4 inch this morning in 20 minutes as I called home to verify. Visibility was low and roads were getting covered. I escaped it and got to 83 & there was nothing. I dont have a 4x4 anymore and our hills can be a beast. An inch or more on the road with a slope is too much for a Camry. Time to buy chains! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JamieOber Posted December 12, 2013 Share Posted December 12, 2013 Isn't the Nam overdoing the QPF? Also I'm wondering if the ratio's are going to be higher than what the models are predicting. Watch those ratios. Can any pro or other person knowledgeable on ratios give us some ideas on that for this storm? The reason why I say this is we had a big bust from a Miller B where we didn't get as much snow due to the awful ratios. The "flakes" were more like needles. So we got about half of what was expected. I remember Joe Lundberg from AccuWeather warning me about it, some layer was too warm or something. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeffsvilleWx Posted December 12, 2013 Share Posted December 12, 2013 Watch those ratios. Can any pro or other person knowledgeable on ratios give us some ideas on that for this storm? The reason why I say this is we had a big bust from a Miller B where we didn't get as much snow due to the awful ratios. The "flakes" were more like needles. So we got about half of what was expected. I remember Joe Lundberg from AccuWeather warning me about it, some layer was too warm or something. At MDT, NAM ratios average 9:1, with the min being 7:1 and the max being 13:1 Temps look good for snow, until a warm layer moves in between 950 and 850 mb right around the transition to fzra. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paweather Posted December 12, 2013 Share Posted December 12, 2013 Looking good. we have solid agreement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sauss06 Posted December 12, 2013 Share Posted December 12, 2013 Roughly noon until early morning sunday, transitioning from snow to fzra at about 10 pm on sat night at MDT, per 12z NAM. cool, tree cutting down in the snow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paweather Posted December 12, 2013 Share Posted December 12, 2013 enjoyment only doubt it verifies completely: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeffsvilleWx Posted December 12, 2013 Share Posted December 12, 2013 enjoyment only doubt it verifies completely: please...no more wxbell... They're the worst. Plus, isn't wxbell a pay site? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whiteout Posted December 12, 2013 Share Posted December 12, 2013 GFS looks really good for the LSV!! Most of the precip falls as snow before the upper air warms to change it to FZDZ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whiteout Posted December 12, 2013 Share Posted December 12, 2013 enjoyment only doubt it verifies completely: GFS is definitely trending colder towards the EURO. Yesterday's runs showed nowhere near that amount of snow for the LSV, even if the maps may be overdone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CarlislePaWx Posted December 12, 2013 Share Posted December 12, 2013 Cobb text output for Westminster says total of 0.68 qpf, with 3.6" snow, 0.22" rain and the rest fzdz. Could you possibly post the link to the cobb site? I can't remember how far back it was discussed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JamieOber Posted December 12, 2013 Share Posted December 12, 2013 please...no more wxbell... They're the worst. Plus, isn't wxbell a pay site? If WxBell snowmaps ever came close to reality, the scenes around PA would make the second half of Day After Tomorrow look like the volcano planet scenes in Revenge of the Sith. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeffsvilleWx Posted December 12, 2013 Share Posted December 12, 2013 Could you possibly post the link to the cobb site? I can't remember how far back it was discussed. http://www.meteor.iastate.edu/~ckarsten/cobb/cobb.php?model=gfsm&site=kmdt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeffsvilleWx Posted December 12, 2013 Share Posted December 12, 2013 If WxBell snowmaps ever came close to reality, the scenes around PA would make the second half of Day After Tomorrow look like the volcano planet scenes in Revenge of the Sith. lol yep. Just to throw this out there, the wxbell snowmaps are NOT GFS verbatim. I'm not sure what kind of algorithm wxbell uses, but it's never right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paweather Posted December 12, 2013 Share Posted December 12, 2013 lol yep. Just to throw this out there, the wxbell snowmaps are NOT GFS verbatim. I'm not sure what kind of algorithm wxbell uses, but it's never right. Sorry didn't get from wxbell. It was posted on Facebook. Understood it won't verify just posting it. Didn't mean any harm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NortheastPAWx Posted December 12, 2013 Author Share Posted December 12, 2013 If we can keep that warm layer out we could make a run at 6. Here's hoping. (UNV 12Z NAM) 131215/0500Z 65 11006KT 25.4F SNPL 6:1| 0.2|| 0.02|| 0.00|| 0.034 10:1| 5.2|| 0.02|| 0.00|| 0.49 63| 37| 0131215/0600Z 66 11005KT 25.6F SNPL 4:1| 0.1|| 0.01|| 0.00|| 0.019 10:1| 5.3|| 0.04|| 0.00|| 0.51 65| 35| 0----------------------------------------------+----++-----+-------------++--------------++-------------++-----------+---+---131215/0700Z 67 10003KT 25.2F SNOW 6:1| 0.1|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.009 10:1| 5.3|| 0.04|| 0.00|| 0.52 100| 0| 0131215/0800Z 68 09003KT 25.2F SNPL 6:1| 0.1|| 0.01|| 0.00|| 0.010 10:1| 5.4|| 0.04|| 0.00|| 0.53 70| 30| 0131215/0900Z 69 VRB02KT 25.2F SNPL 5:1| 0.1|| 0.01|| 0.00|| 0.018 10:1| 5.5|| 0.06|| 0.00|| 0.55 67| 33| 0131215/1000Z 70 VRB01KT 25.6F SNPL 8:1| 0.1|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.013 10:1| 5.6|| 0.06|| 0.00|| 0.56 84| 16| 0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CarlislePaWx Posted December 12, 2013 Share Posted December 12, 2013 I think the latest Cobb data is from the 06Z run. Will amounts be a tad higher from 12Z output? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeffsvilleWx Posted December 12, 2013 Share Posted December 12, 2013 I think the latest Cobb data is from the 06Z run. Will amounts be a tad higher from 12Z output? It is. Still waiting on the 12z Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CarlislePaWx Posted December 12, 2013 Share Posted December 12, 2013 It is. Still waiting on the 12z Yeah...just compared total qpf from both runs and it looks like 12Z went up around 0.15" more. Encouraging for sure unless most of that increase is from ZR at the end. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sauss06 Posted December 12, 2013 Share Posted December 12, 2013 Stays chilly too afterwards Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeffsvilleWx Posted December 12, 2013 Share Posted December 12, 2013 12z gfs adds .209" snow qpf. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Santa Clause Posted December 12, 2013 Share Posted December 12, 2013 Looks like a solid 2 to 4 type for all with cold afterword!! I'm taking it and running!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mappy Posted December 12, 2013 Share Posted December 12, 2013 Cobb text output for Westminster says total of 0.68 qpf, with 3.6" snow, 0.22" rain and the rest fzdz. The snow ratios for Cobb are never right. I always look at the qpf values, which for Westminster was .41 while snow was falling. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeffsvilleWx Posted December 12, 2013 Share Posted December 12, 2013 The snow ratios for Cobb are never right. I always look at the qpf values, which for Westminster was .41 while snow was falling. So coolwx would be a better source than Cobb? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CarlislePaWx Posted December 12, 2013 Share Posted December 12, 2013 12z gfs adds .209" snow qpf. That's not what the text data seems to indicate: ----------------------------------------------+----++-----+-------------++--------------++-------------++-----------+---+--- 131214/1500Z 51 10007KT 25.4F SNOW 13:1| 0.4|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.031 13:1| 0.4|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.03 100| 0| 0 131214/1800Z 54 10009KT 26.3F SNOW 13:1| 1.2|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.093 13:1| 1.6|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.12 100| 0| 0 131214/2100Z 57 09006KT 29.4F SNOW 13:1| 1.9|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.149 13:1| 3.5|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.27 100| 0| 0 131215/0000Z 60 10008KT 31.5F SNZRPL 0:1| 0.0|| 0.27|| 0.14|| 0.269 13:1| 3.5|| 0.27|| 0.14|| 0.54 38| 12| 50 ----------------------------------------------+----++-----+-------------++--------------++-------------++-----------+---+--- 131215/0300Z 63 08006KT 33.2F RAIN 0:1| 0.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.057 13:1| 3.5|| 0.27|| 0.14|| 0.60 0| 0|100 131215/0600Z 66 36003KT 33.2F DZ 0:1| 0.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.019 13:1| 3.5|| 0.27|| 0.14|| 0.62 0| 0|100 131215/0900Z 69 31005KT 29.6F 0:1| 0.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.000 13:1| 3.5|| 0.27|| 0.14|| 0.62 0| 0| 0 131215/1200Z 72 30007KT 27.4F 0:1| 0.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.000 13:1| 3.5|| 0.27|| 0.14|| 0.62 0| 0| 0 ----------------------------------------------+----++-----+-------------++--------------++-------------++-----------+---+--- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NortheastPAWx Posted December 12, 2013 Author Share Posted December 12, 2013 So coolwx would be a better source than Cobb? Sucky part here is that coolwx doesn't get data for KUNV. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mappy Posted December 12, 2013 Share Posted December 12, 2013 So coolwx would be a better source than Cobb? i wouldn't pay attention to anything that tries to predict ratios. its why those snow maps (regardless of where they come from) are hardly right. They all have their own ratios/algorithms they are using to "predict" how much snow actually falls. Which is really hard to narrow down exactly. I only look at qpf values, then assume a 10:1 ratio, since that seems to be about where most snow events fall. Then if its higher than 10:1, you are pleasantly surprised! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rick G Posted December 12, 2013 Share Posted December 12, 2013 That's not what the text data seems to indicate: ----------------------------------------------+----++-----+-------------++--------------++-------------++-----------+---+--- 131214/1500Z 51 10007KT 25.4F SNOW 13:1| 0.4|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.031 13:1| 0.4|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.03 100| 0| 0 131214/1800Z 54 10009KT 26.3F SNOW 13:1| 1.2|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.093 13:1| 1.6|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.12 100| 0| 0 131214/2100Z 57 09006KT 29.4F SNOW 13:1| 1.9|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.149 13:1| 3.5|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.27 100| 0| 0 131215/0000Z 60 10008KT 31.5F SNZRPL 0:1| 0.0|| 0.27|| 0.14|| 0.269 13:1| 3.5|| 0.27|| 0.14|| 0.54 38| 12| 50 ----------------------------------------------+----++-----+-------------++--------------++-------------++-----------+---+--- 131215/0300Z 63 08006KT 33.2F RAIN 0:1| 0.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.057 13:1| 3.5|| 0.27|| 0.14|| 0.60 0| 0|100 131215/0600Z 66 36003KT 33.2F DZ 0:1| 0.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.019 13:1| 3.5|| 0.27|| 0.14|| 0.62 0| 0|100 131215/0900Z 69 31005KT 29.6F 0:1| 0.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.000 13:1| 3.5|| 0.27|| 0.14|| 0.62 0| 0| 0 131215/1200Z 72 30007KT 27.4F 0:1| 0.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.000 13:1| 3.5|| 0.27|| 0.14|| 0.62 0| 0| 0 ----------------------------------------------+----++-----+-------------++--------------++-------------++-----------+---+--- is there a header for this? I would like to see what I am looking at. thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeffsvilleWx Posted December 12, 2013 Share Posted December 12, 2013 I got 0.209 from coolwx's hourly model charts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mappy Posted December 12, 2013 Share Posted December 12, 2013 is there a header for this? I would like to see what I am looking at. thanks. its from Cobb http://www.meteor.iastate.edu/~ckarsten/cobb/cobb.php?model=gfs&site=w54 you will have to plug in your site, currently I have mine at Westminster, MD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.