Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,586
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    LopezElliana
    Newest Member
    LopezElliana
    Joined

December 14/15 winter storm threat


Typhoon Tip

Recommended Posts

pretty stout Ens agreement on QPF. Maybe you are right but I agree this is that model mayhem day. SLP means little when you throw Gulf moisture over the top of Arctic air.

I remember a local Met (Bob Copeland) getting burnt big-time had to be mid-late '70's maybe early '80's. I wish I could remember the year and the storm. What I do remember is the way he tried to backtrack and describe why the snow had gone from 2-4" predicted to a foot region-wide. Very similar. I know Bob used to post here, well on Eastern. Wish he still did. Where have all the good ones gone? I digress, open eyes with the understanding that this has more upscale to it and miracles do happen.       

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 2.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I remember a local Met (Bob Copeland) getting burnt big-time had to be mid-late '70's maybe early '80's. I wish I could remember the year and the storm. What I do remember is the way he tried to backtrack and describe why the snow had gone from 2-4" predicted to a foot region-wide. Very similar. I know Bob used to post here, well on Eastern. Wish he still did. Where have all the good ones gone? I digress, open eyes with the understanding that this has more upscale to it and miracles do happen.

He used to post? That is cool. I liked him

Noyes used to post

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quite late to the party so probably discussed but anyways, there is some pretty staggering similarities with regards to today's 12z Euro and 18z NAM with regards to how the northern and southern stream energies evolve and how/where they end up phasing.  Both models are also fairly similar with regards to strength of each of these features.  This isn't trying to justify their solution(s) will verify but when looking into the various models for some sort of consistency/agreement, it's always a positive to find something.  

 

The GFS is just worlds different with each feature and the progression of these features and the overall pattern.  Even the 12z GFS ensembles seemed to be all over the place with little consistency or agreement within it's own members.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 straight storms it was too wet at ALB. Almost 50% on average.

Incidentally, some places just NE of ALB probably just doubled their seasonal snowfall in a good snow squall that came through.

All models have struggled kind of badly....euro has been good inside of 36-48.

A couple of days ago we had a pretty substantial low. Now it's a 1/2 punch which IMHO more times than not is the model compromise to some other solution. Everything else has been sheared. This does have more going for it, or at least more modeled going for it at 3-4 days

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Right now it looks like its a lack of ROAB site information on the shortwave and its true characteristics for the models to handle.  And the main shortwave of interest is over Northwestern Provinces of Canada currently and its true speed and strength won't be determined until 24 hours out away from the event itself.  ALthough models seem to do better with these systems than ones over NE Pacific Ocean, my best guess is the degree of digging is modeled to be a lot less than actuality will have it.  Case in point would be the Boxing Day Snowstorm of 2010, in that storm we were waiting for the trailing shortwave to phase with the southern stream system and allow a closer to coastline approach by the surface low.  In this setup we are in the same predicament, a lot of models are showing an intense shortwave in the northern stream, some of us thought of triple phase because this is part of the polar vortex system construed over the central Canadian Prairies.  However further analysis and some confirmation suggests this is still northern stream energy which has spilled over the top of the PNA ridge in place over the western US and western Canada.  Anyways back to my main point, we have a faster than normal flow in the northern stream, therefore I expect more of a digging to the southeast of the main vortex that is screwing us up with flooding warm air in the mid levels and the 700mb and 850mb lows moving too far to the northwest so warm air floods the coastline.  Instead this system digs further south and we end up with a stronger system.  Also of note is that this low strengthens at the coastline, and therefore does not weaken, in which the QPF should increase on the northwest side of the surface low if the transfer happens faster than predicted by the models, however this seems less likely as the northern stream system remains closed for a time over the Great Lakes.  I have no clue what in the end will happen, but we should have a better idea within the next 36 hours, enough leeway to get the warnings out and headlines out when needed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yea there is hardly a secondary coastal here late in the run. Mostly a primary across the great lakes, Winds turning southeast and southern new england changing over here sat night

 

Secondary gets going but its cutting across NJ

 

Looks like those warm GEFS members

 

Pretty much the 0z NAM is why I can't get terribly excited about D3+ threats.  There were marked changes very early in the run with the handling at 500mb that played out later.   How that compares to other runs no idea, or whether it'll carry through or this is the NAM being the NAM.

 

It gets warm all the way up to the VT/NY border and blasts the 0c up into SNH and SVT very quickly after mood snows Saturday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...