Ginx snewx Posted December 11, 2013 Share Posted December 11, 2013 Well rounds 1+2 0z wise were wins, Euro should be fun, hope it stays with that 19th sig too Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted December 11, 2013 Share Posted December 11, 2013 Yea, I suppose The Storm of the Century would offer a good rebuttal to a rule of thumb lol Just a bit of isentropic lift Just popped in my head. That storm still has the greatest obs ever coming out of Logan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted December 11, 2013 Share Posted December 11, 2013 Just popped in my head. That storm still has the greatest obs ever coming out of Logan. Track that bad Larry 100 miles to the east Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
powderfreak Posted December 11, 2013 Share Posted December 11, 2013 This would probably be pretty decent for a lot of folks...roughly 36 hour storm? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
centralmass Posted December 11, 2013 Share Posted December 11, 2013 This would probably be pretty decent for a lot of folks...roughly 36 hour storm? Here is an hour by hour look at that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
powderfreak Posted December 11, 2013 Share Posted December 11, 2013 Here is an hour by hour look at that. That would work for a very large chunk of New England...impressive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mahk_webstah Posted December 11, 2013 Share Posted December 11, 2013 HPC on board. One of the best discussions in a while! Triple phase. EXTENDED FORECAST DISCUSSIONNWS WEATHER PREDICTION CENTER COLLEGE PARK MD1206 AM EST WED DEC 11 2013VALID 12Z SAT DEC 14 2013 - 12Z WED DEC 18 2013...MAJOR WINTER STORM THIS WEEKEND FROM THE CENTRAL APPALACHIANSTO THE NORTHEAST......SHARP ARCTIC OUTBREAK FOR THE UPPER MIDWEST SUNDAY AND MONDAY...RELIED ON THE 12Z/10 ECMWF FOR THIS FORECAST PACKAGE, WHICH SHOWEDA STRONG POSITIVE CORRELATION WITH BOTH THE ECENS AND CMCE MEANSFROM THAT DATA CYCLE, AS WELL AS THE 00Z/11 GFS. THE MOST CRITICALREGIONS IN TERMS OF MODEL SPREAD VIS-A-VIS SENSIBLE WEATHERTHREATS ARE THE MIDWEST AND EAST COAST, WHERE SEVERAL SHORTWAVESARE EXPECTED TO CONVERGE. THE DISJOINTED NATURE OF THE COMPLEXFLOW PATTERN EVOLVING OVER THE EASTERN HALF OF THE NATION THISWEEKEND MAKES FORECASTING WHERE SPECIFIC HAZARDS WILL OCCUR QUITEDICEY. THE INTEGRITY OF THE COLD AIR BANKED FROM THE GREAT LAKESTO NEW ENGLAND IS CRUCIAL FOR PRECIPITATION TYPE. THE DUMBBELLINGOF MID-LEVEL VORTICES WILL DICTATE WHERE MOISTURE WILL CONVERGEAND WHERE DRY SLOTS WILL BE FORCED. AT THIS POINT, THE MOST LIKELYDETERMINISTIC OUTCOME WOULD BE FOR A TRANSFER OF SURFACE LOWPRESSURE FROM THE OHIO VALLEY TO THE MID ATLANTIC COAST SATURDAYNIGHT, WITH A SUBSEQUENT BOMBING OF THE ATLANTIC LOW AS AN ARCTICVORTEX PLUNGES INTO THE GREAT LAKES SUNDAY AND SUNDAY NIGHT. THEPRECISE INTERACTION BETWEEN THE GREAT LAKES VORTEX AND THE NEWENGLAND COASTAL LOW WILL DETERMINE HOW SEVERE THE WINTERCONDITIONS BECOME OVER THE NORTHEAST--AND HOW CLOSE SNOW AND ICEGET TO THE MAJOR CITIES FROM WASHINGTON TO BOSTON. ANOTHERATLANTIC COASTAL LOW AT THE END OF PERIOD--NEXT WEDNESDAY--COULDREINVIGORATE WINTER WEATHER FOR THE NORTHEAST METROPOLITANCORRIDOR.THE ARCTIC VORTEX DROPPING INTO THE GREAT LAKES SUNDAY WILL DRAWSOME OF THE COLDEST AIR OF THE SEASON SO FAR INTO THE UPPERMIDWEST. PARTS OF EASTERN NORTH DAKOTA AND NORTHERN MINNESOTA MAYNOT GET ABOVE ZERO FOR A 36-HOUR PERIOD SUNDAY AND MONDAY, WITHMINIMUM TEMPERATURES NEARING THIRTY DEGREES BELOW NORMAL IN THATREGION.OVER THE WEST, THE SPLIT IN THE WESTERLIES OFF THE PACIFIC COASTSHOULD KEEP THE SOUTHWEST DRY AND THE NORTHWEST--ESPECIALLY ALONGAND WEST OF THE CASCADES--UNSETTLED. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamesnichols1989 Posted December 11, 2013 Share Posted December 11, 2013 Three jet streams get involved on this storm, so a triple phase is certainly possible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ctsnowstorm628 Posted December 11, 2013 Share Posted December 11, 2013 Euro is way flatter...something weird is going on at 500mb there. Everything is way off. High is stronger too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORH_wxman Posted December 11, 2013 Share Posted December 11, 2013 Euro is actually colder/SE of the 12z run...that high is a beast. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dryslot Posted December 11, 2013 Share Posted December 11, 2013 .50-.75" qpf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dendrite Posted December 11, 2013 Share Posted December 11, 2013 Three jet streams get involved on this storm, so a triple phase is certainly possible.lol what? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
It's Always Sunny Posted December 11, 2013 Share Posted December 11, 2013 Three jet streams get involved on this storm, so a triple phase is certainly possible. Pretty sure there's just two. Polar and Subtropical. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dendrite Posted December 11, 2013 Share Posted December 11, 2013 Pretty sure there's just two. Polar and Subtropical.Triple phases are a rare thing. I save the term for storms like Mar '93. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
It's Always Sunny Posted December 11, 2013 Share Posted December 11, 2013 Triple phases are a rare thing. I save the term for storms like Mar '93. Yeah I was a bit too young to remember that. You would need like a nose diving Arctic Jet to mingle with the Polar Jet. I'm coming off a mid shift so my mind can't really comprehend this phenomena right now lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dendrite Posted December 11, 2013 Share Posted December 11, 2013 ecens get the 0.75" mean line about 1 county inland through coastal ME from Eastport down through CON-ORH-KHYPE-BDR. 0.50" wiggles around far NNE. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dendrite Posted December 11, 2013 Share Posted December 11, 2013 I'm half awake and haven't looked at much yet, but the euro op/6z gfs look dynamically weaker. We get less of a front end thump and it becomes more of a prolonged -SN/OCNL SN. At least the ecens are juicier than the op. Anyways, hopefully we don't see vort swinging through weakening again as we approach T-0hr. This probably works out better for far SE folks though. I'll take the 0z GGEM though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mahk_webstah Posted December 11, 2013 Share Posted December 11, 2013 Yeah I was a bit too young to remember that. You would need like a nose diving Arctic Jet to mingle with the Polar Jet. I'm coming off a mid shift so my mind can't really comprehend this phenomena right now lol. Well I'm not a meteorologist, nor did I stay at a Holiday Inn late night, but the HPC discussion (see above) describes an arctic shortwave diving in and causing deepening of the low when it is off the coast. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
N. OF PIKE Posted December 11, 2013 Share Posted December 11, 2013 Did this slow down a bit in last 36 hrs? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Randy4Confluence Posted December 11, 2013 Share Posted December 11, 2013 For the newbies, and those who just don't know....think of a low pressure system as a cylinder stretching from se to nw throughout all levels of the atmosphere.....surface being lowest, and furthest se, and H7 being highest, and furthest nw....you want to be just to the nw of the entire cylinder...ie, just nw of the H7 low. Obviously, as a major cyclone matures, the surface and H7 become vertically stacked, and it occludes, but systems at their most prolific stages are elongated se to nw throughout the atmosphere. Thanks good stuff. So 700 lows arr higher up than 500 lows? I've always deduced,from reading posts, that 500 lows, or "Upper Level Lows" are higher but I guess not? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnowMan Posted December 11, 2013 Share Posted December 11, 2013 Thanks good stuff. So 700 lows arr higher up than 500 lows? I've always deduced,from reading posts, that 500 lows, or "Upper Level Lows" are higher but I guess not?I believe 500 lows are higher... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnowGoose69 Posted December 11, 2013 Share Posted December 11, 2013 Did this slow down a bit in last 36 hrs? I did not pay much attention to timing but its entirely possible it did slightly, the models tend to be a bit too fast with systems beyond day 4 and 5, more so in summer than winter but still a bit in winter, I mentioned in the NYC thread 2 days ago that would lead to the high having more time to get in place north of us if the system ended up 24 hours later which could lead to more overrunning snows but also potentially cause the system to be more suppressed in the end and less phased. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moneypitmike Posted December 11, 2013 Share Posted December 11, 2013 Pretty disappointing EC, and the 06z GFS blows--relatively speaking. Hopefully things will revert to stronger/nw solutions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mahk_webstah Posted December 11, 2013 Share Posted December 11, 2013 I did not pay much attention to timing but its entirely possible it did slightly, the models tend to be a bit too fast with systems beyond day 4 and 5, more so in summer than winter but still a bit in winter, I mentioned in the NYC thread 2 days ago that would lead to the high having more time to get in place north of us if the system ended up 24 hours later which could lead to more overrunning snows but also potentially cause the system to be more suppressed in the end and less phased. will be interesting to see if this is the trend. Broadly speaking I would expect it to trend more s and e on the runs, for a day or 2 and then come back partly nw. I thikn we often se that with model depictions in big storms...they sniff them out 6-7 days, the models waffle or trend, and then come back closer to the 6-7 day outcome. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Randy4Confluence Posted December 11, 2013 Share Posted December 11, 2013 Weather Channel has me with snow showers and <1 inch on Sat....what the Sam hell? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ice1972 Posted December 11, 2013 Share Posted December 11, 2013 Thanks good stuff. So 700 lows arr higher up than 500 lows? I've always deduced,from reading posts, that 500 lows, or "Upper Level Lows" are higher but I guess not? 500 Upper Level 700 Mid Level 850 Low Level 925 Surface (well just off the deck - forget about how high this is) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weathafella Posted December 11, 2013 Share Posted December 11, 2013 500 Upper Level 700 Mid Level 850 Low Level 925 Surface (well just off the deck - forget about how high this is) While I'm not positive I think 700/850 are mid levels. 850 is about 5,000 feet so it would be hard for me to conjure that as low level. Think of it this way: 300: jet stream 500: 18,000 700: 10,000 850: 5,000 925: 2,000 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted December 11, 2013 Share Posted December 11, 2013 Pretty disappointing EC, and the 06z GFS blows--relatively speaking. Hopefully things will revert to stronger/nw solutions. You're fine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ice1972 Posted December 11, 2013 Share Posted December 11, 2013 While I'm not positive I think 700/850 are mid levels. 850 is about 5,000 feet so it would be hard for me to conjure that as low level. Think of it this way: 300: jet stream 500: 18,000 700: 10,000 850: 5,000 925: 2,000 Excellent....thanks....I remember the order but never knew the actual altitude....I believe the altitudes fluctuate up and down around those numbers you posted.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted December 11, 2013 Share Posted December 11, 2013 Excellent....thanks....I remember the order but never knew the actual altitude....I believe the altitudes fluctuate up and down around those numbers you posted.... Yes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.