Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,916
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    simbasad2
    Newest Member
    simbasad2
    Joined

December 14/15 winter storm threat


Typhoon Tip

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
 

 

  On 12/13/2013 at 3:00 AM, Roosta said:

Will be interesting to see what amounts local Mets put out to the masses on this evening broadcasts.  

Fox 25 holding serve from earlier.  3-5" inside 495.  5"+ outside 495.  1-3" SEMA/CC.

 

I think Pete's actually looked the most reasonable.  6-9" tickling the 128 loop.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lol that was epic. Like we said last night, yesterday was the day model mayhem took place, today they settle out, tomorrow they hone in. I like the trend of, increased QPF, better high position, stronger earlier cyclogenesis. Should be one of the more interesting days tomorrow as it all congeals

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 12/13/2013 at 3:13 AM, Ginxy said:

Lol that was epic. Like we said last night, yesterday was the day model mayhem took place, today they settle out, tomorrow they hone in. I like the trend of, increased QPF, better high position, stronger earlier cyclogenesis. Should be one of the more interesting days tomorrow as it all congeals

Very well said

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 12/13/2013 at 3:13 AM, SnowGoose69 said:

The RGEM pretty much putting the NAM idea to bed right away, its not too far off through 00Z and the end of its run but it appears the surface low is going to head for Worcester if you look at its last couple of frames.

 

I put much more stock in the RGEM/GGEM up until this storm vs the NAM.  But a cutter?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 12/13/2013 at 3:16 AM, Winston Wolf said:

I put much more stock in the RGEM/GGEM up until this storm vs the NAM.  But a cutter?

 

It won't be that bad but the RGEM sure appears its going to put the low over land in SNE in some shape or form, remember the RGEM much like the NAM can sometime be iffy beyond 36 hours.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 12/13/2013 at 2:31 AM, ORH_wxman said:

This is the BOS jackpot run.

 

 

The NAM is like Kindergarden. Everyone gets a turn to be the winner.

 

:lol:   ...I dunno tho -- too much cold air to think p-type problems.  It's brutal and we have a second wave yet to refill...  I'm down to 13F here 10pm, with a dp of 3, and this will be back-filled off a stationary arctic high?  

 

good luck with that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 12/13/2013 at 3:18 AM, SnowGoose69 said:

It won't be that bad but the RGEM sure appears its going to put the low over land in SNE in some shape or form, remember the RGEM much like the NAM can sometime be iffy beyond 36 hours.

Despite this NW solutions I agree with Scott - likely to go over ACK because of the high placement.  No way this storm plows through that...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 12/13/2013 at 3:15 AM, cpick79 said:

Can u just move 15 miles nw to foxboro to save urself the annual heartache

Lol, while I tend to agree I live so far in the northwest corner of TAN, I can pretty much throw a rock from here to Attleboro, which does better than me as well.

However I still think we have a good shot at >3, but who knows

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In terms of NAM -storm placement and intensity evolution I really don't have any criticism. It's dead nuts on the consensus over the last 24 hours of model-blizzard.  

 

QPF ...heh, tough.  In one respect, the storm should be toting an above normal pwat column; in another respect, the NAM definitely has a high-QPF bias beyond 48 hours.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...