Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,606
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    ArlyDude
    Newest Member
    ArlyDude
    Joined

December 10 -11 3rd Wave


NEG NAO

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 767
  • Created
  • Last Reply

ecmwf_z500_norm_noram_13.png

 

 

At 72 hours as the Polar Vortex is swinging  ENE and it depresses the Height field in the SE . The difference in the modeling we are going to see over the next 48 hours is

will be where exactly the pulse ends up . That will create the boundary , too strong a push SE with the PV  its a WHIFF a little less pressure and it " may " snow .

I don't like these set ups because they don't like to break our way . Without help in the Atlantic , you are cold and dry or " warmer and wet " .

No doubt its cold and the 12z Euro really ices New England next weekend . But lets hope as the PV leaves  just maybe something can trail it out and send it on its way before we get zonal for a few days .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What is your reasoning? ECM with in 72 hrs is virtually unbeatable.. NAM is horrible in the longer range of that model run..GFS has been oscillating back and forth...

It was beatable within 12 hours last night. Snywx is still waiting for his 6 inches. No model is perfect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was beatable within 12 hours last night. Snywx is still waiting for his 6 inches. No model is perfect.

If one goes off those snow maps from the weather models they are always going to be disappointed..  one has to be able to decipher between thicknesses and frontal timing with precipitation instead of relying on those snow maps...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If one goes off those snow maps from the weather models they are always going to be disappointed.. one has to be able to decipher between thicknesses and frontal timing with precipitation instead of relying on those snow maps...

They were forecasted to get several inches, so it's not like just the Euro showed it, it was being predicted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They were forecasted to get several inches, so it's not like just the Euro showed it, it was being predicted.

I understand that but to me the models were pretty clear that the thicknesses were going to remain pretty high along with the surface temps until after the precipitation moved thru. Heck we did not even drop down here any lower then like 34 degrees and that was not till early morning long after the precipitation was thru...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I understand that but to me the models were pretty clear that the thicknesses were going to remain pretty high along with the surface temps until after the precipitation moved thru. Heck we did not even drop down here any lower then like 34 degrees and that was not till early morning long after the precipitation was thru...

Yet the models and forecasts for called for several inches of accumulating snow. That's why I'm saying you can't really discount anything, whether they show snow or nothing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I understand that but to me the models were pretty clear that the thicknesses were going to remain pretty high along with the surface temps until after the precipitation moved thru. Heck we did not even drop down here any lower then like 34 degrees and that was not till early morning long after the precipitation was thru...

 

Upton had us receiving 2-4" as well.. It wasn't that simple dude.. When all guidance leans a certain way you are not gonna just dismiss it. You can't find a 3" snow report unless you are in C or W PA. Most places in New england got nothing to 2" and this includes higher elevations. Bottomline is that last nights event was a bust. Plain and simple

Link to comment
Share on other sites

why because it doesnt show your favorable outcome??

 

No, because it often doesn't see smaller events and the model is not as perfect as everyone thinks it is. It can be great at more large scale storms, but I still remember that huge bust on that coastal storm it was showing. 

 

I also think the models are underestimating the SE ridging which remains potent after the second wave. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My forecast would be sunny for Tuesday

Stuff like this shouldn't b on the board u don't find the dumb s in any other board . Sux to have read past this crap

And if you post ur opinion just show why u think that u think it's Gona b sunny ok great. Tell us u think the heights in the south get suppressed and the max escapes or anything U post this passive aggressive stuff just to annoy pp it's a wx board no opinion is wrong if u can show a reason

Just my opinion

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stuff like this shouldn't b on the board u don't find the dumb s in any other board . Sux to have read past this crap

And if you post ur opinion just show why u think that u think it's Gona b sunny ok great. Tell us u think the heights in the south get suppressed and the max escapes or anything U post this passive aggressive stuff just to annoy pp it's a wx board no opinion is wrong if u can show a reason

Just my opinion

Euro shows clear skies any wave looks far south and east
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You do know that the euro isnt god, right?

 

 

I could toss the GFS idea easily with this event if its ensemble support was not as strong as it has been the last 2-3 runs and some of the typically suprressed models being more amped than the Euro/GGEM...I don't think this has potential to be a big area wide event but I-95 area East and South has a chance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...