michsnowfreak Posted December 6, 2013 Share Posted December 6, 2013 A whopping 0.13" imby off the NAM. I'm not totally familiar with the terminology, but I believe this what you would classify as a DAB? No. DAB means dusting at best. Clearly 0.13" is going to be 1-2", far greater than a dusting at best. I would think DAB is 0.1" or less. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicago Storm Posted December 6, 2013 Author Share Posted December 6, 2013 A DAB is anything up to 0.9" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snowstormcanuck Posted December 6, 2013 Share Posted December 6, 2013 A DAB is anything up to 0.9" No. DAB means dusting at best. Clearly 0.13" is going to be 1-2", far greater than a dusting at best. I would think DAB is 0.1" or less. 0.9" sounds more like a CAB. But 0.2" or 0.3" would still be a dusting in my books. I'll draw my line at <0.5". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cyclone77 Posted December 6, 2013 Share Posted December 6, 2013 0.9" sounds more like a CAB. But 0.2" or 0.3" would still be a dusting in my books. I'll draw my line at <0.5". For some of the lake peeps like Weatherbo a DAB=<4" lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Powerball Posted December 6, 2013 Share Posted December 6, 2013 A whopping 0.13" imby off the NAM. I'm not totally familiar with the terminology, but I believe this what you would classify as a DAB? 1-2" is stat-padding snow. It's one of those snowfalls where you're like... http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m9xav4ucoY1qdcx64.gif ...yet it still counts towards the seasonal snowfall totals, which if you get enough of this stat-padding snow you MIGHT even eek out an average or above-average snowfall. EDIT: Is also known as CAB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snowstormcanuck Posted December 6, 2013 Share Posted December 6, 2013 For some of the lake peeps like Weatherbo a DAB=<4" lol. Yup. I saw that 4-8" hardly seems worth mentioning comment earlier. What a lucky guy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thunder Road Posted December 6, 2013 Share Posted December 6, 2013 No. DAB means dusting at best. Clearly 0.13" is going to be 1-2", far greater than a dusting at best. I would think DAB is 0.1" or less. A DAB is anything up to 0.9" 1-2" is stat-padding snow. It's one of those snowfalls where you're like... http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m9xav4ucoY1qdcx64.gif ...yet it still counts towards the seasonal snowfall totals, which if you get enough of this stat-padding snow you MIGHT even eek out an average or above-average snowfall. EDIT: Is also known as CAB. Got it. So it goes mood flakes, DAB, CAB, stat-padder, and then finally something worth caring about? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicago Storm Posted December 6, 2013 Author Share Posted December 6, 2013 0.9" sounds more like a CAB. But 0.2" or 0.3" would still be a dusting in my books. I'll draw my line at <0.5". A coating and a dusting are essentially the same thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stebo Posted December 6, 2013 Share Posted December 6, 2013 Got it. So it goes mood flakes, DAB, CAB, stat-padder, and then finally something worth caring about? All of it is snow and at the end of winter it all adds up, except the traces. I don't get the whole point of people characterizing snowfall types so much. We don't do that to any other type of precipitation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snowstormcanuck Posted December 6, 2013 Share Posted December 6, 2013 A coating and a dusting are essentially the same thing. Can you cite authority or is that just your opinion? I figure these loose definitions are largely subjective. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicago Storm Posted December 6, 2013 Author Share Posted December 6, 2013 All of it is snow and at the end of winter it all adds up, except the traces. I don't get the whole point of people characterizing snowfall types so much. We don't do that to any other type of precipitation. lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Powerball Posted December 6, 2013 Share Posted December 6, 2013 Got it. So it goes mood flakes, DAB, CAB, stat-padder, and then finally something worth caring about? Mood flakes would be a trace of snow (snowflakes flying in the air). 2-4" puts you into nuisance snow category. It creates a mess of everything (and lays down a legit blanket of snow), yet you still feel jipped as the snow is not very deep and it didn't last very long or took forever to add up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wisconsinwx Posted December 6, 2013 Share Posted December 6, 2013 A coating and a dusting are essentially the same thing. I always thought of a dusting like a trace or maybe a tad more, so it could include 0.1" or 0.2", but I've never thought it meant up to an inch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wisconsinwx Posted December 6, 2013 Share Posted December 6, 2013 Mood flakes would be a trace of snow (snowflakes flying in the air). 2-4" puts you into nuisance snow category. It creates a mess of everything (and lays down a legit blanket of snow), yet you still feel jipped as the snow is not very deep and it didn't last very long or took forever to add up. For motorists, but some of those snows are too enjoyable for us s to call a 'nuisance snow'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snowstormcanuck Posted December 6, 2013 Share Posted December 6, 2013 Mood flakes would be a trace of snow (snowflakes flying in the air). 2-4" puts you into nuisance snow category. It creates a mess of everything (and lays down a legit blanket of snow), yet you still feel jipped as the snow is not very deep and it didn't last very long or took forever to add up. Again, subjective, but I'd define 2-4" as moderate snow, not nuisance. lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicago Storm Posted December 6, 2013 Author Share Posted December 6, 2013 Can you cite authority or is that just your opinion? I figure these loose definitions are largely subjective. Opinion and just how I see terms used around here (Off the board). Both are essentially any "insignificant" amount. Once you have enough to cover the grass, which is about an inch, that's the magic threshold. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicago Storm Posted December 6, 2013 Author Share Posted December 6, 2013 Again, subjective, but I'd definite 2-4" as moderate snow, not nuisance. lol This. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snowstormcanuck Posted December 6, 2013 Share Posted December 6, 2013 This. It's relative to climo to a degree. I can count the number of 2-4" events I get in an average winter on one hand. That can't possibly satisfy the definition of nuisance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wisconsinwx Posted December 6, 2013 Share Posted December 6, 2013 Again, subjective, but I'd define 2-4" as moderate snow, not nuisance. lol The problem is moderate is an intensity, you could have 18-24 hours of light snow that adds up to that range. It would be 'moderate snowfall amounts', but just 'moderate snowfall' can be misleading in this case. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jonger Posted December 6, 2013 Share Posted December 6, 2013 It all depends on if there is snow on the ground. Getting 1 inch by itself isn't very exciting or noteworthy, but if you have snowpack, 1 inch will really clean things up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cyclone77 Posted December 6, 2013 Share Posted December 6, 2013 00z GFS a little lighter on the QPF compared to previous runs. Looks a little more Euroish to me. First call for here and the QC is 1-2", but the lower range of that will probably be the norm. EDIT: Could be some areas out in central Iowa that could see 2-4". Hawkeye and DLL may do halfway decent with this thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snowstormcanuck Posted December 6, 2013 Share Posted December 6, 2013 The problem is moderate is an intensity, you could have 18-24 hours of light snow that adds up to that range. It would be 'moderate snowfall amounts', but just 'moderate snowfall' can be misleading in this case. In terms of storm total snowfall, to me, 3 to 6 inches (2 is too low) is moderate snowfall, regardless of duration (within reason). I think most will be able to discern the context and realize that it's different than observational intensity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cyclone77 Posted December 6, 2013 Share Posted December 6, 2013 I've always considered anything under 3" a light snow. 3-6" as a moderate snow, and anything 6"+ a heavy snowfall. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michsnowfreak Posted December 6, 2013 Share Posted December 6, 2013 It all depends on if there is snow on the ground. Getting 1 inch by itself isn't very exciting or noteworthy, but if you have snowpack, 1 inch will really clean things up. Agree. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thunder Road Posted December 6, 2013 Share Posted December 6, 2013 All of it is snow and at the end of winter it all adds up, except the traces. I don't get the whole point of people characterizing snowfall types so much. We don't do that to any other type of precipitation. You're right, multiple days of showers is really just the same thing as a flash flood at the end of the summer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stebo Posted December 6, 2013 Share Posted December 6, 2013 You're right, multiple days of showers is really just the same thing as a flash flood at the end of the summer. Fine if you need to be completely cynical and extreme then sure a flash flood is different than showers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harry Posted December 6, 2013 Share Posted December 6, 2013 Mood flakes at best for those in MI with this crap and 1-3 in IA/WI per euro. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cyclone77 Posted December 6, 2013 Share Posted December 6, 2013 Mood flakes at best for those in MI with this crap and 1-3 in IA/WI per euro. Yeah. 00z Euro makes for a 3rd run in a row with a decrease in qpf. Now down to under a tenth for the QC. Another run or two and our 1-1.5" will be down to a FAB. Flake at best. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wisconsinwx Posted December 6, 2013 Share Posted December 6, 2013 Mood flakes at best for those in MI with this crap and 1-3 in IA/WI per euro. Areas north of Milwaukee near the lake may well see some decent lake enhancement along with the .15-.25QPF system snows. The GFS, GEM and LSX WRF have all been hinting at that, and some of the previous Euro runs as well. I know it's not likely to be a major storm, but probably worthy of an advisory in the highest QPF areas, and what does fall will stick around. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harry Posted December 6, 2013 Share Posted December 6, 2013 Areas north of Milwaukee near the lake may well see some decent lake enhancement along with the .15-.25QPF system snows. The GFS, GEM and LSX WRF have all been hinting at that, and some of the previous Euro runs as well. I know it's not likely to be a major storm, but probably worthy of an advisory in the highest QPF areas, and what does fall will stick around. Tough call on that with lake enhancement. Ofcourse the further north you are ahead of the system the better the odd's on that side of the lake. On this side all depends on how much moisture will be left after the system passes. Does not look optimal at this point ( everything IS there except moisture ) on this side atleast not till that clipper type system arrives mid week. Hard to say with this stuff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.