Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,606
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    ArlyDude
    Newest Member
    ArlyDude
    Joined

Dec 8th - 9th (2nd wave/winter storm discussion)


Zelocita Weather

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 791
  • Created
  • Last Reply

SPC WRF is in and has a 23-00Z start time here...looks very similar to the HRRR overall...the biggest surprise so far tonight is the higher res models swinging towards a much later start time in the DC area and parts of MD and DE.

Does the WRF have P-type, I looked around and couldnt find it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does the WRF have P-type, I looked around and couldnt find it.

 

No, not that I can tell...was just discussing in the MA thread how none of the models at 00Z grasped the precip currently over TN/KY particularly well through 06Z...the RGEM and SPC WRF were the best but still not great, GFS and NAM were out to lunch on it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, not that I can tell...was just discussing in the MA thread how none of the models at 00Z grasped the precip currently over TN/KY particularly well through 06Z...the RGEM and SPC WRF were the best but still not great, GFS and NAM were out to lunch on it.

So what does that exactly mean for tomorrow? Just that the WRF and RGEM should be chosen over the GFS and NAM for this storm?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And what have we learned about weather bell??? No more weather bell snow maps please. We all know they r wrong.

Dude , Its not a "weatherbell " map , the algo prints out 10 to 1 ratio based on what the model says . The Euro is printing .02 inches of liquid in through minus 2 air at 850

with surface temps at 33- 34 throught CNJ, That's reasonable . If it doesn't happen its cause the model busted not the algo . Hopefully  in the dead of winter those maps are

gona bust the other way when 15 to 1 ratios goes off

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dude , Its not a "weatherbell " map , the algo prints out 10 to 1 ratio based on what the model says . The Euro is printing .02 inches of liquid in through minus 2 air at 850

with surface temps at 33- 34 throught CNJ, That's reasonable . If it doesn't happen its cause the model busted not the algo . Hopefully in the dead of winter those maps are

gona bust the other way when 15 to 1 ratios goes off

Dude I know. But the algorithm it uses is useless. That's all I was getting at. I guess I'm sry I used the word map when I should have said crappy snowfall map using a terrible algorithm.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Nam has gotten colder and has nearly a .5" of precip before the changeover which is like 2-4" at least. I'm not buying that, but an inch or two is definitely on the table. The temperatures are a bit colder than expected and the cloud cover will keep them colder today.

 

The NAM appears to be seeing a mesoscale band developing off of some sort of frontogenesis max, may be legit may be not, there is a hint of it in several of the high res models and the 12Z Hi RES NAM is seeing it too

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The NAM appears to be seeing a mesoscale band developing off of some sort of frontogenesis max, may be legit may be not, there is a hint of it in several of the high res models and the 12Z Hi RES NAM is seeing it too

Yeh it may def took the best lifting north with the WAA  wants to throw 2- 4 from CNJ north across the city .

Its seeing a deeper layer of cold initially at the surface , while the 850`s roar north .

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...