Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,586
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    LopezElliana
    Newest Member
    LopezElliana
    Joined

December Pattern Disco- 2013


Damage In Tolland

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Sounds like the long range is not awful and potentially improving?

 

 

I would say that is a fair assessment. I don't think it has ever looked awful on the ensembles. There's been OP GFS runs that look awful out in clown range.

 

But it is nice to see that the troughing near AK that was showing up several days ago in the 11-15 has not gotten worse as we get closer. The uncertainty aspect remains, but I'm glad that uncertainty at D15 3 days ago has not turned into a developing furnace at D12 today.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would say that is a fair assessment. I don't think it has ever looked awful on the ensembles. There's been OP GFS runs that look awful out in clown range.

 

But it is nice to see that the troughing near AK that was showing up several days ago in the 11-15 has not gotten worse as we get closer. The uncertainty aspect remains, but I'm glad that uncertainty at D15 3 days ago has not turned into a developing furnace at D12 today.

definitely not a furnace at day 12...getting milder but not torched.

 

12-15 look solidly above (at least speaking to 850 anomalies) across the CONUS but there's plenty of cold lurking north of the border. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What seems to be happening is what a few groups had been discussing..that any big mildup or prolonged change to warm just isn't in the cards this month. With the amount of cold around..you just can't go warm this year

Yes and No. The period to watch because of the GOA troughing hasn't gotten worse. The troughing there has been limited as modeled. It still may give us fits, but it's probably going to be transient as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Next week may be interesting if all we get is that inverted nipple of low pressure extending from the parent low. The reason being is because it then leaves a baroclinic zone along the coast for more energy to ride up. Just a possibility.

 

 

A lot of guidance has shown this today...really for the first time. That would be a bit strange to have that occur. I'll have to check back and see if any similar setup happened in that manner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Next week may be interesting if all we get is that inverted nipple of low pressure extending from the parent low. The reason being is because it then leaves a baroclinic zone along the coast for more energy to ride up. Just a possibility.

going to be pretty tough for something to beat down those heights east of FL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A lot of guidance has shown this today...really for the first time. That would be a bit strange to have that occur. I'll have to check back and see if any similar setup happened in that manner.

It's definitely not a high prob, but some signs of it as you said. Just finally taking a look at the models now. The only way I could envision that is if next week turned into more a cutter (more of an interior mess so to speak) and just hung the boundary on the east coast. I can't picture a legit SWFE that would do this, but I could be wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oops!  For some reason I thought the plunge had stopped at zero.  Shows what happens when I'm 1,300 miles from my data.

 

 

Going off the mean temp on the day, Xmas 1983 has to take the cake, just brutal with a biting wind.. peak gust at newark was 39 mph when it was 2 degrees out

 

The major NY stations:

 

KNYC  7/16

KLGA  3/10

KJFK   2/11

KEWR 2/10

 

I'm not sure why KNYC is so much "warmer" on this day than other stations

 

I do realize 1980 had a midnight high on christmas, and the day time was spent around 5 degrees

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The euro ensembles and the GEFS almost reversed it seems . The GEFS have a stronger dateline ridge, but also troughing extending offshore from the west coast. Weaker -NAO signal too.  I almost like the euro ensembles better as they have more NW flow at H5 coming from western Canada and a more of an east based -NAO. I suppose you can argue the GEFS have more of a trough overhead, but I'm referring to the overall picture. The surface is cooler on the GEFS, but extrapolated past hr 360...I thought the euro ensembles were decent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah Scott, it would appear the EURO ensembles have a better look to them with more -NAO east based, and troughing over Hudson Bay in the form of the -AO polar vortex focusing the troughing overhead or slightly west compared to the GEFS ensemble mean which has really no pure -NAO present.  They have some ridging, but it's not overwhelming like the EURO ensemble cast mean.  What do they look like for the 9th through the 16th period?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

See for yourself.

attachicon.gifLR.PNG

 

Scott ... I really think the -EPO and the AA phase of the N. Pac are dominating factors until further notice.  (GLAAM flips phase to positive and with (-) co-relationship with the EPO, that only strengthens persistent signal).   One countering influence is the MJO maturing in the 3/4 wave space, but I think so long as the WPO remains so locked and in a powerful negative anomaly,  the MJO's potential influence is going to be rather muted.

 

I see a lot of spread (as I am sure you and others are aware) in the individual EOFs for the NAO domain, and "usually" when that happens (per my own experience) there is about equal chances for a given trend line to break down and just wind up wrong.  Right now a lot of members are negative, but can't agree on the degree of departure, and that could just as well be a sign that a -NAO is out there, as not there. Could mean an emerging positive lurks when the members mop end like that.  If tonight's computations show more coherency in that regard I'll get more interested.  The same holds true for the AO for that matter (though I argue the AO is less important for us depending on whether the EPO and NAO are in constructive wave interference).    I wouldn't count on a lot of help from the NAO is all.. though, with those 10-Can anomalies, a deep NW flow might be a little terrifying.  Ha!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...