Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,604
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    ArlyDude
    Newest Member
    ArlyDude
    Joined

Potential Record Breaking Cold Sunday/Sunday Night---Late Nov Discussion


ORH_wxman

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

BTV's long term discussion on the storm...

&& Long term /Monday through Friday/... as of 300 PM EST Friday...extended portion of the forecast will continue to feature cold temperatures and possibility of a significant storm impacting the north country on Wednesday. Monday will be mainly dry and cold with surface ridge of high pressure sliding southeastward during the daytime hours. A weak low pressure system passing north of our forecast area Monday night into Tuesday will bring a chance of snow showers to the County Warning Area...especially our northern zones. Coastal storm is taking shape during this time period over the Gulf Coast and slowly tracking eastward Tuesday night to the Carolina coast by Wednesday morning. European model (ecmwf) brings this low across our Sweet spot...right off the coast of Cape Cod on Wednesday afternoon. GFS is slower and further east with this system...keeping the low center further out to sea. The European model (ecmwf) brings up possibility for significant snow across Vermont from Tuesday night through Wednesday night. A lot of the details are still unclear...as the previous forecaster mentioned...there is potential for phasing between the northern and southern stream troughs and a strong vorticity/closed low involved. The GFS and European model (ecmwf) are closer than they were this time yesterday...but still not exactly in agreement on timing or track of low. Phasing events are very difficult to forecast...but it is Worth mentioning that there is potential for deep Gulf moisture...strong baroclinicity at 850 and a favorable synoptic pattern. These ingredients mean that potential exists for significant East Coast cyclogenesis possibly bringing the first significant snowfall of the winter to Vermont...especially eastern and central. Northwesterly flow following this departing low for Thursday...so will have upslope snow showers on northwesterly flow and more colder than normal temperatures. "

Link to comment
Share on other sites

WHat does loading pattern refer to?  I mean I would like to get the terminology back that I used to know.  My illness has stripped me of my basic knowledge of weather, and my technical discussion aspects.

 

The pattern Will showed is the classic loading pattern or look for a +EPO. The exact opposite would be a -EPO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So ridging near the Gulf of Alaska would favor an East Coast Snowstorm?

Well ridging near AK favors cross polar flow and a dump of colder air into the CONUS. Getting a snow event means getting a s/w to track in the right spot, but yeah obviously having the cold would help in getting snow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well ridging near AK favors cross polar flow and a dump of colder air into the CONUS. Getting a snow event means getting a s/w to track in the right spot, but yeah obviously having the cold would help in getting snow.

 

Does trough positioning have an impact on the potential for OES?  Like say for instance, the trough centers over the region, does that impact surface winds?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does trough positioning have an impact on the potential for OES?  Like say for instance, the trough centers over the region, does that impact surface winds?

The EPO in simple terms refers to whether there is ridging or troughing over Alaska/Gulf of Alaska. We are currently in a -EPO phase which means ridging over Alaska/Gulf of Alaska which helps stream colder air into the Central/Eastern US. The position of the trough does impact the potential for OES depending on how negatively tilted it is. Surface winds will be impacted depending on the position of the trough and your location relative to it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Went digging a little bit into the NCEP pytpe algorithms (no such luck for the ECMWF).

 

The GFS uses a combination of 4 algorithms (tie going to the most dangerous ptype). One is biased towards snow to eliminate lots of occurrences of IP and ZR. Two others use wet bulb temps, and we know how well models handle moisture (especially in the longer ranges).

 

And keep in mind GFS and ECMWF both have 6 hourly time steps. So if the model sees snow at 06z (or 12, 18, 00) all that QPF prior to that hour will be converted to snow. We know this is not always the case. Always best to view soundings to confirm ptype.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The EPO in simple terms refers to whether there is ridging or troughing over Alaska/Gulf of Alaska. We are currently in a -EPO phase which means ridging over Alaska/Gulf of Alaska which helps stream colder air into the Central/Eastern US. The position of the trough does impact the potential for OES depending on how negatively tilted it is. Surface winds will be impacted depending on the position of the trough and your location relative to it.

 

Thank you for the explanation.  Just trying to clear up a few questions I had.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Went digging a little bit into the NCEP pytpe algorithms (no such luck for the ECMWF).

The GFS uses a combination of 4 algorithms (tie going to the most dangerous ptype). One is biased towards snow to eliminate lots of occurrences of IP and ZR. Two others use wet bulb temps, and we know how well models handle moisture (especially in the longer ranges).

This is the case even though they compute three-hour qpf?

And keep in mind GFS and ECMWF both have 6 hourly time steps. So if the model sees snow at 06z (or 12, 18, 00) all that QPF prior to that hour will be converted to snow. We know this is not always the case. Always best to view soundings to confirm ptype.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Went digging a little bit into the NCEP pytpe algorithms (no such luck for the ECMWF).

 

The GFS uses a combination of 4 algorithms (tie going to the most dangerous ptype). One is biased towards snow to eliminate lots of occurrences of IP and ZR. Two others use wet bulb temps, and we know how well models handle moisture (especially in the longer ranges).

 

And keep in mind GFS and ECMWF both have 6 hourly time steps. So if the model sees snow at 06z (or 12, 18, 00) all that QPF prior to that hour will be converted to snow. We know this is not always the case. Always best to view soundings to confirm ptype.

Don't the ec/gfs run 3hrly steps now?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...