dendrite Posted December 22, 2010 Share Posted December 22, 2010 I'd take that bet. I'm not convinced. We'll see. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JJBASHB Posted December 22, 2010 Share Posted December 22, 2010 Correct me if I'm wrong but the energy diving in over MN on the 0z GFS is squashing the system out to sea. Where as the euro consolidates the energy leading to the divergence in outcome. Will was discussing this on the show but I was curious if this is what he was looking at. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dendrite Posted December 22, 2010 Share Posted December 22, 2010 I've got to pay you to see it early Twister is verrryyy slow with updating the GFS. Raleigh's page housed on here (click "goto" in the menu), ewall, and Plymouth update fairly quickly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weathafella Posted December 22, 2010 Share Posted December 22, 2010 I wonder why I look at the Nogaps. eg: 96 hours, basically bone dry over the entire NOAM continent... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OKpowdah Posted December 22, 2010 Share Posted December 22, 2010 My bet is Euro is significantly further east tonight. No doubt. We had a r*dio sh*w tonight lol. In all seriousness, I think the Euro is mostly unchanged, just slightly east. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OKpowdah Posted December 22, 2010 Share Posted December 22, 2010 Well not sure on that, once we see the 0z I think we can start to really draw some conclusions. How is the UKIE not sure about what? I'm comparing to the 12z Euro Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DomNH Posted December 22, 2010 Share Posted December 22, 2010 I'm not convinced. We'll see. You think it looks like 12z? I don't have the best feeling. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Logan11 Posted December 22, 2010 Share Posted December 22, 2010 It's pretty clear that a few small nuances could result in huge track differences - literally from out to sea well south of the BM to a wrapped up bomb like the Euro. I figure flip a coin at this point. It's a biggie...just well offshore. Quite the amplified long wave pattern though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CCPSUSuperstorm2010 Posted December 22, 2010 Share Posted December 22, 2010 The fact that the GFS is playing catch up with the trough for tomorrow for NNE and eastern SNE, then that is a red flag that the GFS is not seeing something correctly even 24 hours out. The QPF continues to increase with the GFS which now shows 2-5 perhaps 3-6" of snow now for the Cape. NAM shows the same thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DomNH Posted December 22, 2010 Share Posted December 22, 2010 The fact that the GFS is playing catch up with the trough for tomorrow for NNE and eastern SNE, then that is a red flag that the GFS is not seeing something correctly even 24 hours out. The QPF continues to increase with the GFS which now shows 2-5 perhaps 3-6" of snow now for the Cape. NAM shows the same thing. Possibly, but let's be honest, you're just balls to the wall for the inverted trough tomorrow and wanted to talk about it in this thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Logan11 Posted December 22, 2010 Share Posted December 22, 2010 I thought that the NAM and GFS looked pretty similar at 84 hours which doesn't seem great since the GFS blew it after 84 hours Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weatherwiz Posted December 22, 2010 Share Posted December 22, 2010 This is a serious question... How can people say what one model will show when it hasn't even began to initialize yet? What is everyone's basis for that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DomNH Posted December 22, 2010 Share Posted December 22, 2010 This is a serious question... How can people say what one model will show when it hasn't even began to initialize yet? What is everyone's basis for that? My Dr. No senses are tingling. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snowNH Posted December 22, 2010 Share Posted December 22, 2010 IMO.. the gfs looks way better.. it actually has a major storm now... The way I look at it, it can't be worse than it is now... give it time.. this is prefect for 114 out.. did you really want to be in the bullseye 5 days out? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clinch Leatherwood Posted December 22, 2010 Share Posted December 22, 2010 Correct me if I'm wrong but the energy diving in over MN on the 0z GFS is squashing the system out to sea. Where as the euro consolidates the energy leading to the divergence in outcome. Will was discussing this on the show but I was curious if this is what he was looking at. Back up 18 hours and you'll see a little vortmax just north of the dakotas, that's the trainwreck. If you track it down and through it hits the base of the trough as more energy is loading down. The GFS really spins it up, but by the time the rest of the energy comes in it's snuck NE. Probably an error to be honest. Assuming this scenario is right and the NAM being on board tells me it's probably close, we should see a low form offshore and get wrapped up. Probably along the lines of the old EC/GGEM just further east. I'm thinking 12z EC Ensemble... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weathafella Posted December 22, 2010 Share Posted December 22, 2010 This is a serious question... How can people say what one model will show when it hasn't even began to initialize yet? What is everyone's basis for that? I went by the fact that UKMET compared 72 to ECMWF 84. Now I don't have the 84 hours UKMET to compare apples to apples but frequently they show trends similarly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clinch Leatherwood Posted December 22, 2010 Share Posted December 22, 2010 IMO.. the gfs looks way better.. it actually has a major storm now... The way I look at it, it can't be worse than it is now... give it time.. this is prefect for 114 out.. did you really want to be in the bullseye 5 days out? No but I also dont want to be 700 miles from it either. wxwiz, that's just people having fun. Kind of a guess really. The Ensemble per scott was near the BM, so the op may end up following suit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snowNH Posted December 22, 2010 Share Posted December 22, 2010 Should I be the first one? The gfs looks better at 500 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weathafella Posted December 22, 2010 Share Posted December 22, 2010 No but I also dont want to be 700 miles from it either. wxwiz, that's just people having fun. Kind of a guess really. The Ensemble per scott was near the BM, so the op may end up following suit. For GFS at 120-132 hours, I think that's just about where we want to be. Think every big storm we've had in the past decade. GFS whiffed at this time frame including Jan 2005 which it didn't stop whiffing until 36 hours out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clinch Leatherwood Posted December 22, 2010 Share Posted December 22, 2010 Well the trend continues. Can we get a radio show to talk about the bruins season and just put an end to the misery now? The UKMET images are on the other thread, it's way out to sea. Seems a little apparent now it's all or nothing, it gets captured or it gets away and it's like a day at the races, that horse has legs. Cmoooon trickle down trough! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weatherwiz Posted December 22, 2010 Share Posted December 22, 2010 I went by the fact that UKMET compared 72 to ECMWF 84. Now I don't have the 84 hours UKMET to compare apples to apples but frequently they show trends similarly. Ahh alright...just wondering. Thanks for the answer! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weathafella Posted December 22, 2010 Share Posted December 22, 2010 Well the trend continues. Can we get a radio show to talk about the bruins season and just put an end to the misery now? The UKMET images are on the other thread, it's way out to sea. Seems a little apparent now it's all or nothing, it gets captured or it gets away and it's like a day at the races, that horse has legs. Cmoooon trickle down trough! No one's seen UKMET past 72 hours. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clinch Leatherwood Posted December 22, 2010 Share Posted December 22, 2010 No one's seen UKMET past 72 hours. What's that map on the other page with the low like 400 miles east of HAT? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JJBASHB Posted December 22, 2010 Share Posted December 22, 2010 Back up 18 hours and you'll see a little vortmax just north of the dakotas, that's the trainwreck. If you track it down and through it hits the base of the trough as more energy is loading down. The GFS really spins it up, but by the time the rest of the energy comes in it's snuck NE. Probably an error to be honest. Assuming this scenario is right and the NAM being on board tells me it's probably close, we should see a low form offshore and get wrapped up. Probably along the lines of the old EC/GGEM just further east. I'm thinking 12z EC Ensemble... Cool, thanks for the reply. From the sounds of it I have to agree on the all or nothing solution. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorEastermass128 Posted December 22, 2010 Share Posted December 22, 2010 Back up 18 hours and you'll see a little vortmax just north of the dakotas, that's the trainwreck. If you track it down and through it hits the base of the trough as more energy is loading down. The GFS really spins it up, but by the time the rest of the energy comes in it's snuck NE. Probably an error to be honest. Assuming this scenario is right and the NAM being on board tells me it's probably close, we should see a low form offshore and get wrapped up. Probably along the lines of the old EC/GGEM just further east. I'm thinking 12z EC Ensemble... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weathafella Posted December 22, 2010 Share Posted December 22, 2010 What's that map on the other page with the low like 400 miles east of HAT? D6 at 12Z had it like that but we don't know 0Z yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dendrite Posted December 22, 2010 Share Posted December 22, 2010 No one's seen UKMET past 72 hours. It's a bomb out to sea. Put the radio show on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clinch Leatherwood Posted December 22, 2010 Share Posted December 22, 2010 No one's seen UKMET past 72 hours. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weathafella Posted December 22, 2010 Share Posted December 22, 2010 It's a bomb out to sea. Put the radio show on. Who's seen it...where's the link? Other media on and don't feel like putting on headphones. It was a bomb at 12z but I'm not sure it's available that far out yet...maybe yes... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DomNH Posted December 22, 2010 Share Posted December 22, 2010 I went by the fact that UKMET compared 72 to ECMWF 84. Now I don't have the 84 hours UKMET to compare apples to apples but frequently they show trends similarly. I believe it was last Thursday night when we saw the GFS go OTS and then the UKMET followed suit and we just about "knew" where the Euro was going to go. Might not be as big a shift as it was last week, but I'm with you on this one. Off to bed before any bad news. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.