Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,586
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    LopezElliana
    Newest Member
    LopezElliana
    Joined

Storm next weekend has better teleconnector support than this misery ever did


Typhoon Tip

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Let's see if the euro bias is being too slow ejecting the southwest energy is in place here. I'd rather it be the case...because I think all of SNE would prefer a later phase and a rapidly deepening low as it makes it up here instead of a very strong, but occluding low with dry slot and mixing issues.

As the thegreatdr mentioned, the Euro ensemble mean has the best skill for low placement at this range compared to any other model or model consensus. If you want to hang your hat on a solution, it would be that one.

Which at 5 days is still 200 or so miles I believe give or take if not more?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yeah...I was thinking it had that look too. Once it occludes we're all frozen. I can live with sleet...just keep the rain away gun_bandana.gif

If you're going by the EC I don't think so. Not with the surface low tucked in that close to the coast. That looks to me like a few inches of initial overruning snow as it rolls up the coast followed by coastal front hell and buckets of 40s and rain while NW of a ORH-BDL-DXR line it's 28 in S+. Fortunately the event is still six days away and that solution is unlikely to verify.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you're going by the EC I don't think so. Not with the surface low tucked in that close to the coast. That looks to me like a few inches of initial overruning snow as it rolls up the coast followed by coastal front hell and buckets of 40s and rain while NW of a ORH-BDL-DXR line it's 28 in S+. Fortunately the event is still six days away and that solution is unlikely to verify.

Yeah tend to agree here. But whatever...details are meaningless right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Extraordinarily tough for 95% of that to fall as snow anywhere east of orh in that setup...imo. major bl problems.

Yeah that would be a bummer for you and I in terms of ptype, but at least we would change back. The thing is....all of sne could afford an east shift because the comma head is huge. This could go over the BM and still bury God's country.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah that would be a bummer for you and I in terms of ptype, but at least we would change back. The thing is....all of sne could afford an east shift because the comma head is huge. This could go over the BM and still bury God's country.

yep...that run at face value is wagons west!...way west.

mrg would be doing naked bong hits out on his picnic table though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So the GFS is weakest, UKMET is somewhere between but leaning towards the EC, and the JMA of North American Models, the GGEM agrees with the EC?

just wanted to clarify

Env Canada does not even access the GGEM within 48 hours........ 0% of the GGEM is used to build 48 hour forecast grids.

GGEM did just fine comparitively with the last event for its intended use in the midrange.....

not sure how the RGEM did in the short range though...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

just wanted to clarify

Env Canada does not even access the GGEM within 48 hours........ 0% of the GGEM is used to build 48 hour forecast grids.

GGEM did just fine comparitively with the last event for its intended use in the midrange.....

not sure how the RGEM did in the short range though...

I don't remember it that way. Both the GGEM and RGEM were horrid. The GGEM at 48-96 hardly ever even had precip NW of the BM and certainly it had none of the heavy stuff that existed. It was worse than even the NOGAPS.

Does anyone have or remember a single instance where a 144hr or 132 hr bomb on the GGEM came close to verifying just for sake of all the comparisons and analogs we like to use.

I'm pretty sure there is a graphic that shows us how each model verifies and if I remember the GGEM is normally near the bottom.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't remember it that way. Both the GGEM and RGEM were horrid. The GGEM at 48-96 hardly ever even had precip NW of the BM and certainly it had none of the heavy stuff that existed. It was worse than even the NOGAPS.

Does anyone have or remember a single instance where a 144hr or 132 hr bomb on the GGEM came close to verifying just for sake of all the comparisons and analogs we like to use.

I'm pretty sure there is a graphic that shows us how each model verifies and if I remember the GGEM is normally near the bottom.

the GGEM bombed the low and brought it into new england on the exact same 2 runs the euro did, both within 100 hours.

anyways, its not as bad as people think IMO (but then again im Canadian :lol: ).... its just the maps suck, lol.

id take the GGEM over the Ukie anyday, thoguh i know someone will post a chart showing otherwise..... i suppose its just a matter of personal taste.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So the GFS is weakest, UKMET is somewhere between but leaning towards the EC, and the JMA of North American Models, the GGEM agrees with the EC?

The Ukie develops way too fast too fast and far south for our interests ( at least in my opinion, I'll doublecheck), but it does have a bomb.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...