Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,586
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    LopezElliana
    Newest Member
    LopezElliana
    Joined

Storm next weekend has better teleconnector support than this misery ever did


Typhoon Tip

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I see that now, not bad wiz!

I guess I'm not as dumb as I think :lol:

Been trying to not just take the models for what they show but rather look at what they are showing and then trying to ask myself if what they are showing is correct or not. I've remembered a few times in the past the models will show a pretty big bomb but not a great deal of QPF and this caught many people off guard and in the end there was just so much dry air being worked into the system so this was just something that popped into my mind.

Just like the cases where like the GFS will show like 2'' of QPF but only have a sfc pressure of like 1002 mb :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How this stalls and only produces a general 1 1\4" of liquid is beyond me.....I understood that on the more progressive soloutions.

Storms that stall are occluded or occluding so the mechanisms that generate precipitation are usually weakening. Precip rates are more highly correlated to rate of deepening than depth of low. So once a low stalls, most of the heavy precip is usually out of the vicinity. Decaying CCBs and various mesoscale features are exceptions to this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Storms that stall are occluded or occluding so the mechanisms that generate precipitation are usually weakening. Precip rates are more highly correlated to rate of deepening than depth of low. So once a low stalls, most of the heavy precip is usually out of the vicinity. Decaying CCBs and various mesoscale features are exceptions to this.

True, but others stallers have been much more prolific than this is modeled as being.

I think what it comes down to is that obviously long range QPF depictions are for sh**, and the system is not really being aided by much in the way of isentropic lift.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

True, but others stallers have been much more prolific than this is modeled as being.

I think what it comes down to is that obviously long range QPF depictions are for sh**, and the system is not really being aided by much in the way of isentropic lift.

That is a GREAT point. Usually when you see bombs and want to see juicy QPF you'd like to see a good amount of warm air and moisture being advected into the storm within the warm sector but you're not really seeing that right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

True, but others stallers have been much more prolific than this is modeled as being.

I think what it comes down to is that obviously long range QPF depictions are for sh**, and the system is not really being aided by much in the way of isentropic lift.

Yeah, following the evolution of the modeled storm, there would normally be a larger 1"+ swath with a stripe of 2" in there somewhere. The storm is definitely NOT in the weakening / decaying CCB stage when it reaches New England.

One decent proposal from Wes -- the huge low over the Atlantic will be generating westerlies back to 65W, which could be limiting moisture convergence from the Atlantic. Although we're still looking at healthy RH fields, so who knows.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Where's Will for info on the Ukie past 72 HR?

The GFS appears to be a bit more amplified with heights and a bit stronger with the s/w in the SW than the Ukie at 72...now that this probably means much right now.

Wait a second...

Ukie on Ewall only goes out to 72 HR but here it goes out past that correct?

http://meteocentre.com/models/get_panel.php?mod=ukmet&run=00&stn=PNM&map=na〈=en

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 00z EURO is essentially a more intense Jan 1996.

It scares me a little for up here. It closes off and gets captured south of LI. Great for you guys, but concerning for me despite respectable QPF. Jan 1996 had a brutal latitudinal gradient through MA/NH. I might throw fits like you if the Mid Atl gets another HECS and I'm left dry. :snowman:
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It scares me a little for up here. It closes off and gets captured south of LI. Great for you guys, but concerning for me despite respectable QPF. Jan 1996 had a brutal latitudinal gradient through MA/NH. I might throw fits like you if the Mid Atl gets another HECS and I'm left dry. :snowman:

I absolutely see this shaping up like that.....somewhere around the MA\NY border over to about Manchester, NH is gonna see one helluva cut.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

968mb low a tic s of ACK and a 1028mb high over MN=56mb gradient.

1978 had 1052 high just NW of MN and a 984 low near the BM=64mb gradient.

We probably won't see this verify quite so intense, but just goes to show you what type of beast is being modeled.

968mb? Wow...that's freaking intense...that's even stronger than what the GFS is showing...that could be a good sign.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...