weatherwiz Posted December 21, 2010 Share Posted December 21, 2010 If Kevin used 1888 for this system when the euro/gfs destroyed us I wonder what he uses tomorrow morning when he sees this run Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clinch Leatherwood Posted December 21, 2010 Share Posted December 21, 2010 I know this, but it just irks me so badly not to see 2"+ depicted on charts. lol NCEP fixed it for you but about 10 days later. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted December 21, 2010 Share Posted December 21, 2010 GEFS mean still quite a bit SE like the EC ens. The EC ens mean didn't do me any good at 84 hrs last week, so I'm not letting it bother me at 132 hrs this week. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weatherwiz Posted December 21, 2010 Share Posted December 21, 2010 I see that now, not bad wiz! I guess I'm not as dumb as I think Been trying to not just take the models for what they show but rather look at what they are showing and then trying to ask myself if what they are showing is correct or not. I've remembered a few times in the past the models will show a pretty big bomb but not a great deal of QPF and this caught many people off guard and in the end there was just so much dry air being worked into the system so this was just something that popped into my mind. Just like the cases where like the GFS will show like 2'' of QPF but only have a sfc pressure of like 1002 mb Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ROOSTA Posted December 21, 2010 Share Posted December 21, 2010 Fantasy modeled traincar after traincar, till April it looks like. Where can one vote for this? Out! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weatherwiz Posted December 21, 2010 Share Posted December 21, 2010 What's the link to show what each of the individual members are showing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weathafella Posted December 21, 2010 Share Posted December 21, 2010 CMC crawls this as a monster but close to the coast. The good news is the 1041 banana HP so I think we can work out details to our advantage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ctsnowstorm628 Posted December 21, 2010 Share Posted December 21, 2010 CMC crawls this as a monster but close to the coast. The good news is the 1041 banana HP so I think we can work out details to our advantage. plus, unlike the other models, the cmc has been all over the place with the upper air pattern and placement with the storm... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HIPPYVALLEY Posted December 21, 2010 Share Posted December 21, 2010 CMC crawls this as a monster but close to the coast. The good news is the 1041 banana HP so I think we can work out details to our advantage. Hopefully to the advantage of all of SNE. G' night. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eduggs Posted December 21, 2010 Share Posted December 21, 2010 How this stalls and only produces a general 1 1\4" of liquid is beyond me.....I understood that on the more progressive soloutions. Storms that stall are occluded or occluding so the mechanisms that generate precipitation are usually weakening. Precip rates are more highly correlated to rate of deepening than depth of low. So once a low stalls, most of the heavy precip is usually out of the vicinity. Decaying CCBs and various mesoscale features are exceptions to this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted December 21, 2010 Share Posted December 21, 2010 Storms that stall are occluded or occluding so the mechanisms that generate precipitation are usually weakening. Precip rates are more highly correlated to rate of deepening than depth of low. So once a low stalls, most of the heavy precip is usually out of the vicinity. Decaying CCBs and various mesoscale features are exceptions to this. True, but others stallers have been much more prolific than this is modeled as being. I think what it comes down to is that obviously long range QPF depictions are for sh**, and the system is not really being aided by much in the way of isentropic lift. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weatherwiz Posted December 21, 2010 Share Posted December 21, 2010 True, but others stallers have been much more prolific than this is modeled as being. I think what it comes down to is that obviously long range QPF depictions are for sh**, and the system is not really being aided by much in the way of isentropic lift. That is a GREAT point. Usually when you see bombs and want to see juicy QPF you'd like to see a good amount of warm air and moisture being advected into the storm within the warm sector but you're not really seeing that right now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OKpowdah Posted December 21, 2010 Share Posted December 21, 2010 True, but others stallers have been much more prolific than this is modeled as being. I think what it comes down to is that obviously long range QPF depictions are for sh**, and the system is not really being aided by much in the way of isentropic lift. Yeah, following the evolution of the modeled storm, there would normally be a larger 1"+ swath with a stripe of 2" in there somewhere. The storm is definitely NOT in the weakening / decaying CCB stage when it reaches New England. One decent proposal from Wes -- the huge low over the Atlantic will be generating westerlies back to 65W, which could be limiting moisture convergence from the Atlantic. Although we're still looking at healthy RH fields, so who knows. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weatherwiz Posted December 21, 2010 Share Posted December 21, 2010 Where's Will for info on the Ukie past 72 HR? The GFS appears to be a bit more amplified with heights and a bit stronger with the s/w in the SW than the Ukie at 72...now that this probably means much right now. Wait a second... Ukie on Ewall only goes out to 72 HR but here it goes out past that correct? http://meteocentre.com/models/get_panel.php?mod=ukmet&run=00&stn=PNM&map=na〈=en Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted December 21, 2010 Share Posted December 21, 2010 The 00z EURO is essentially a more intense Jan 1996. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted December 21, 2010 Share Posted December 21, 2010 About 10-20" regionwide. .....~1" QPF Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weatherwiz Posted December 21, 2010 Share Posted December 21, 2010 The 00z EURO is essentially a more intense Jan 1996. Seriously? That's pretty sweet. How is it track wise compared to the GFS? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted December 21, 2010 Share Posted December 21, 2010 Seriously? That's pretty sweet. How is it track wise compared to the GFS? S of it a little bit.....Just inside the BM and just s of ACK....perfect for me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dendrite Posted December 21, 2010 Share Posted December 21, 2010 The 00z EURO is essentially a more intense Jan 1996. It scares me a little for up here. It closes off and gets captured south of LI. Great for you guys, but concerning for me despite respectable QPF. Jan 1996 had a brutal latitudinal gradient through MA/NH. I might throw fits like you if the Mid Atl gets another HECS and I'm left dry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ScituateWX Posted December 21, 2010 Share Posted December 21, 2010 The 00z EURO is essentially a more intense Jan 1996. , On a side not just got in from plowing we ended up with a solid 4 inches here in Scituate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted December 21, 2010 Share Posted December 21, 2010 It scares me a little for up here. It closes off and gets captured south of LI. Great for you guys, but concerning for me despite respectable QPF. Jan 1996 had a brutal latitudinal gradient through MA/NH. I might throw fits like you if the Mid Atl gets another HECS and I'm left dry. I absolutely see this shaping up like that.....somewhere around the MA\NY border over to about Manchester, NH is gonna see one helluva cut. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dendrite Posted December 21, 2010 Share Posted December 21, 2010 I absolutely see this shaping up like that.....somewhere around the MA\NY border over to about Manchester, NH is gonna see one helluva cut. Well it's still early in the game. Wasn't most of Mass modeled to be out of Jan 1996 and in the last few runs it all came N? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weatherwiz Posted December 21, 2010 Share Posted December 21, 2010 S of it a little bit.....Just inside the BM and just s of ACK....perfect for me. Yeah that's definitely a much better track for you than what the GFS is showing...I'd still see some good snows from that...but at this point 3-4'' is good snows Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted December 21, 2010 Share Posted December 21, 2010 968mb low a tic s of ACK and a 1028mb high over MN=56mb gradient. 1978 had 1052 high just NW of MN and a 984 low near the BM=64mb gradient. We probably won't see this verify quite so intense, but just goes to show you what type of beast is being modeled. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted December 21, 2010 Share Posted December 21, 2010 Well it's still early in the game. Wasn't most of Mass modeled to be out of Jan 1996 and in the last few runs it all came N? Yea.....kept creeping up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weatherwiz Posted December 21, 2010 Share Posted December 21, 2010 968mb low a tic s of ACK and a 1028mb high over MN=56mb gradient. 1978 had 1052 high just NW of MN and a 984 low near the BM=64mb gradient. We probably won't see this verify quite so intense, but just goes to show you what type of beast is being modeled. 968mb? Wow...that's freaking intense...that's even stronger than what the GFS is showing...that could be a good sign. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dendrite Posted December 21, 2010 Share Posted December 21, 2010 Anyone catch the min SLP on the NOGAPS? I can't even read that...lol https://www.fnmoc.navy.mil/wxmap_cgi/cgi-bin/wxmap_single.cgi?area=ngp_namer&dtg=2010122100&prod=thk&tau=156&set=Core Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weatherwiz Posted December 21, 2010 Share Posted December 21, 2010 Anyone catch the min SLP on the NOGAPS? I can't even read that...lol https://www.fnmoc.na...au=156&set=Core It's like below 950mb lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted December 21, 2010 Share Posted December 21, 2010 It's like below 950mb lol. Hopefully the the CCB would reach me before it underwent an ERC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weatherwiz Posted December 21, 2010 Share Posted December 21, 2010 Hopefully the the CCB would reach me before it underwent an ERC. Snowcane FTW! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.