Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,606
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    ArlyDude
    Newest Member
    ArlyDude
    Joined

Thanksgiving Week Nor'easter Discussion


Zelocita Weather

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 769
  • Created
  • Last Reply

It still has the second low down south but much weaker, looks to be falling in line

I think we are developing a better model consensus. The GFS is not quite there yet but it jumped toward something much closer to the wetter ECMWF and GGEM solutions taking the low through the benchmark which I doubt will happen. Unless the ECMWF and GGEM jump to out to sea solutions, I think we are looking at a very wet Tuesday night & Wednesday morning followed by windy cold and blustery weather for Wednesday night and Thanksgiving!

WX/PT

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 0z Euro also has much of the area in the 60s on Wednesday.

On initial look we see many maps in the 120-380 hour range that look promising for snow. At least they are promising for precipitation as our pattern gradually changes. But the problem for snow is that there is too much ridging in the western Atlantic and as the shortwaves move across the deep south  heights rise dramatically out ahead of them as the Atlantic ridge flexes its muscle. This, for the time being, looks as though it's going to try to force each storm system n-ward on the coast or inland bringing predominantly or all rain. That's what is happening this week, and the same kind of thing now shows up on the Euro at 240 hours. Well, at least it's 240 hours, and it can change. We need some high lattitude blocking up north to help change this.

WX/PT

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On initial look we see many maps in the 120-380 hour range that look promising for snow. At least they are promising for precipitation as our pattern gradually changes. But the problem for snow is that there is too much ridging in the western Atlantic and as the shortwaves move across the deep south heights rise dramatically out ahead of them as the Atlantic ridge flexes its muscle. This, for the time being, looks as though it's going to try to force each storm system n-ward on the coast or inland bringing predominantly or all rain. That's what is happening this week, and the same kind of thing now shows up on the Euro at 240 hours. Well, at least it's 240 hours, and it can change. We need some high lattitude blocking up north to help change this.

WX/PT

Good point WX....but at least we have storms, last winter we hardly even had anything to talk about till Feb.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On initial look we see many maps in the 120-380 hour range that look promising for snow. At least they are promising for precipitation as our pattern gradually changes. But the problem for snow is that there is too much ridging in the western Atlantic and as the shortwaves move across the deep south  heights rise dramatically out ahead of them as the Atlantic ridge flexes its muscle. This, for the time being, looks as though it's going to try to force each storm system n-ward on the coast or inland bringing predominantly or all rain. That's what is happening this week, and the same kind of thing now shows up on the Euro at 240 hours. Well, at least it's 240 hours, and it can change. We need some high lattitude blocking up north to help change this.

WX/PT

 

I agree. We finally have a more active southern branch, to help pump up the heights over the Southeast and West Atlantic, to force a more westerly track. But no good high-latitude block and 50/50 low to sustain confluence over the region. The GFS is also has a bias for breaking down the Southeast or West Atlantic ridge to quickly. That's why I don't give the GFS much credit, over the other models that show a more westerly track.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Imperator

That term has nothing to do with snow.

 

Since I have YanksWeenie on ignore Ill respond to you. I was referring to the literal term of a nor'easter, which means its a NE Wind driven storm, I don't see any northeast winds with this storm. As DT, has said, just because its a coastal (or near coastal) low, doesn't mean its a nor'easter, regardless of what type of precip falls. Anyone who uses the term nor'easter on a non-nor'easter is merely hyping. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it's not a nor'easter as modeled by the euro since we don't get NE winds. the evolution of this storm changed a lot

Some use the term Southeaster if the low passes west of us, although I have no idea if everyone on the east coast must see NE winds for it to be called a nor'easter (what if it cuts through cape cod?)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...