Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,606
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    ArlyDude
    Newest Member
    ArlyDude
    Joined

Thanksgiving Week Nor'easter Discussion


Zelocita Weather

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 769
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I think it has been stated numerous times already that this isn't a threat for NYC & points east.  Anyone 30+ miles NW of NYC should be monitoring this.

I grew up in your area and I know parts or Orange county average 2 - 2.5X as much snow as the City.  Snow is usually more likely to the NW.  This threa is no exception.  But I think everyone is still in the game 5 days out.  Climo and recent guidance suggest certain areas are more likely than others, but the ensemble spread still includes everybody.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not a perfect setup, but it almost never is.

Just looking at the 12z  GFS temp profiles.  KNYC at hour 120 has a wet bulb temp below 1000mb.  That would be snow.  Surface temps don't look to increase much during the day with a north wind and limited solar heating.  850mb and esp just above is marginal... but I believe supportive of snow from nyc metro north and west.  Rough est from the charts would be about .1 - .6 liquid eq. west to east across the area.  I don't love the GFS solution, but I think it depicts accumulating snow for many.  And that's pretty exciting for the day before Thanksgiving.

 

I think we could get a closer track without a warmer profile.  The cold air is not locked too far to the west.  It is not ideally located either.  I just don't think this is as hopeless as you seem to describe.  Maybe I just have low expectations for snow in general, and so I consider any trackable snow threat kind of exciting.  To me, this is a legit threat.  I would put probs of >1" of snow for the metro region at somewhere between 10 and 25%.

A wetbulb below zero isn't automatically snow. There could be warm layers elsewhere which would mean sleet or non-snow. The flow aloft is SW so that is definitely possible.

 

Other than that, we'll just have to see what happens. The cold air will definitely be limited near the coast without northern stream involvement. This doesn't include areas far inland like the Poconos or Catskills, but up there not much precip may fall if we have a strung out low.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A wetbulb below zero isn't automatically snow. There could be warm layers elsewhere which would mean sleet or non-snow. The flow aloft is SW so that is definitely possible.

 

Other than that, we'll just have to see what happens. The cold air will definitely be limited near the coast without northern stream involvement. This doesn't include areas far inland like the Poconos or Catskills, but up there not much precip may fall if we have a strung out low.

You're right.  But I looked at the model forecast soundings.  The column is below freezing except right at the surface.  Not useful or forecasting purposes at this range, but I just wanted to make a point about what the 12z model showed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Meh, that initial vort is screwing the pooch and robbing what should be the main low still hung up down south. Once that initial wave develops, it pulls everything east.

 

When the models were initially showing the potential for this 10 days out it had a triple phaser. That would have been much better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not a perfect setup, but it almost never is.

Just looking at the 12z  GFS temp profiles.  KNYC at hour 120 has a wet bulb temp below 1000mb.  That would be snow.  Surface temps don't look to increase much during the day with a north wind and limited solar heating.  850mb and esp just above is marginal... but I believe supportive of snow from nyc metro north and west.  Rough est from the charts would be about .1 - .6 liquid eq. west to east across the area.  I don't love the GFS solution, but I think it depicts accumulating snow for many.  And that's pretty exciting for the day before Thanksgiving.

 

I think we could get a closer track without a warmer profile.  The cold air is not locked too far to the west.  It is not ideally located either.  I just don't think this is as hopeless as you seem to describe.  Maybe I just have low expectations for snow in general, and so I consider any trackable snow threat kind of exciting.  To me, this is a legit threat.  I would put probs of >1" of snow for the metro region at somewhere between 10 and 25%.

 

 

GFS BUFKIT does support non-accumulating light snow for LGA. There are no hidden warm-layers above the surface despite the SW flow aloft. However, with surface temperatures remaining above freezing and the fact that the lift is pretty weak in the snow growth region, I do not see much support for accumulating snow. With the anafront a couple of weeks ago, there was much better lift in the snow growth zone. In a borderline setup such as this, I definitely want a bit of a closer track to get into the better UVVs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks... That map actually looks realistic

If you look at the temperature profiles, this would all fall as a very quick front end thump before quickly changing to rain. Anything that falls as the second low scoots by would be very light and the surface would still be warm likely ending in just some flurries.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...