Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,609
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

11/13 - 11/16 Potential Storm Threat


WE GOT HIM

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 391
  • Created
  • Last Reply

The cutoff low cuts off too far south. This can actually be tied back to the progressive pattern. Despite the ridge being amplified, the fast nature of the pattern upstream of it forces it to move east quickly and become unstable. This causes the top of it to break like a wave, forcing the energy to slide more underneath it and pinch off instead of moving east. This is why it cuts off to the south instead of to the east. 

 

So ironically, a further west solution can still mean a progressive pattern -- although this is more south and west. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Euro continues to read the shorter wave lenghts thats allows this to get trapped and not

slip out .

The datails RIAN / SNOW  are a long way for me to worry about , but I take this a positive that the Euro likes the capture option.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

which sounds a hellvua a lot more realistic.

Not really. The Euro and the GFS are now more than 1000 miles apart on a track with a storm less than 7 days out. This 12z run is actually a more extreme version of it's 00z run. That coastal takes a very long time to get its act together and then takes a long time to come north. It's quite possible that the high to the north is being moved out to quickly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll take a nice storm if the Euro is right, it would be impressive to see snow so far south though in mid November. Any snow before mid December is rare and a gift so I wouldn't expect it. I suppose it's not a bad thing that the Euro is the westernmost solutions while the gfs is the easternmost, which would favor something in the middle perhaps. 

 

I'll gladly take a nice soaking rainstorm though, at least it would break the pattern finally. Whether it happens or not is still to be determined. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The cutoff low cuts off too far south. This can actually be tied back to the progressive pattern. Despite the ridge being amplified, the fast nature of the pattern upstream of it forces it to move east quickly and become unstable. This causes the top of it to break like a wave, forcing the energy to slide more underneath it and pinch off instead of moving east. This is why it cuts off to the south instead of to the east. 

 

So ironically, a further west solution can still mean a progressive pattern -- although this is more south and west. 

 

What remains of the ridge over SE Canada is also giving the cut-off more room upstream to amplify. The ridge is just too progressive for us on this run, if you want snow.

 

16748eg.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...