Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,611
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

Significant Severe Weather Threat Friday 10/4


tornadotony

Recommended Posts

Just playing devil's advocate. It is early October, but you can't ignore the impressive setup that's modeled for mid-late afternoon. We'll see.

The low-level jet is located behind that precip area and will eventually displace it as the cyclone strengthens and the the LLJ shifts N and advects the warm front/lift zone north.  We may be focused a little farther south than we thought this time yesterday, but I'm thinking that with the moisture, shear, and instability that are already in place and, in the case of the last two, only need minimal advection northward, in addition to the forcing along the dryline that will be in place, this event is as close to sealed as possible at this point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 504
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Don't get me wrong, I know this has serious potential, otherwise I would have turned back. Just under 2 hours from the eastern IA border now, been driving since before 6 last night. I'm pretty confident there are at least a few strong tornadoes today and hopefully those who are out chasing will get to see some good action.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is just absolutely a classic, prototypical Iowa violent tornado setup.  Iowa seems to specialize in events with these fairly compact, deep lows, bulging drylines/sharp triple points, and numerous cases in the past have ended in spectacular results.  The two cases that come to the forefront of my mind when looking at this setup are 5/27/95 (3 F4s, including the famous Stuart double vortex) and 4/8/99 (2 F4s, including a very large, >1 mi wide F4 that passed near Creston and Stuart (again)).  And just because it's not April or May doesn't mean that the ceiling is automatically lower than those two events.  The atmosphere doesn't care what date it is, and I think this setup is going to be another case that proves that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree the date doesn't matter.. particularly in that region which has seen higher end events almost all year round.  Well, it matters as far as not having daylight till 9:30. :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah I think last night proved a few things, a decently strong tornado at night in October in that part of the world should dispels some of the worry that this system might not live up to potential.

Tidbit: Even Connecticut had an F-4 tornado in October...10/3/1979.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm seeing a slightly disturbing trend in the RAP and HRRR models as the morning goes on.  They seem to light up not only the dryline/cold front in wrn IA but also the warm front in ern IA/SW WI.  Each RAP model increases the CAPE/decreases the sfc-based CINH more and more, and the HRRR has cells with intense updraft helicity west of Dubuque and Davenport.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tidbit: Even Connecticut had an F-4 tornado in October...10/3/1979.

Oh yeah, October can be a sneaky good month for severe weather same with November, people tend to focus more on April/May but there have been very strong outbreaks in Oct/Nov in the last 20 years in the Plains/Lakes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm seeing a slightly disturbing trend in the RAP and HRRR models as the morning goes on.  They seem to light up not only the dryline/cold front in wrn IA but also the warm front in ern IA/SW WI.  Each RAP model increases the CAPE/decreases the sfc-based CINH more and more, and the HRRR has cells with intense updraft helicity west of Dubuque and Davenport.

Given the 0-3km CAPE and the surface vorticity along the warm front projected around 20z, I am not surprised

 

3cvr_20.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tidbit: Even Connecticut had an F-4 tornado in October...10/3/1979.

I'm climo's biggest fan but it's not a good way to forecast an anomalous event. Maybe as far as historical potential etc, but otherwise.. meh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm pretty much with Tony in the magnitude of expectations department, and will say I'm rather surprised at the morning SWODY1, honestly. There are ways for this to bust, but that's true of all but a few events per decade. In my mind, there's at least a 50% chance this day will be remembered decades from now. Currently in Council Bluffs trying to decide how long we can hedge between the warm sector/WF cells east versus the arcing front late.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm pretty much with Tony in the magnitude of expectations department, and will say I'm rather surprised at the morning SWODY1, honestly. There are ways for this to bust, but that's true of all but a few events per decade. In my mind, there's at least a 50% chance this day will be remembered decades from now. Currently in Council Bluffs trying to decide how long we can hedge between the warm sector/WF cells east versus the arcing front late.

Something is biting at me, making it feel like climo is playing way more of a forecast role than it should.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's always disconcerting when each successive model run ramps up the threat leading up to an event, and that's frankly what's happening right now.  The 13z HRRR run is a nightmare for IA, with a cluster of violent supercells near Des Moines and then the string of pearls along the dryline.

 

hlcy_t2sfc_f12.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

FWIW, here is an image from a custom WRF-ARW Model ran with level 2 radar assimilation, satellite, sfc obs, etc. Today it is being offered FREE as a trial due to some server technical difficulties that are out of our hands.

 

Go here: http://hazardnotifications.com/custommodeling/

 

and use the following name/pass:

Username:public
Password:public123

 

 

Another run is currently scheduled for 17Z

post-1673-0-53379600-1380905566_thumb.pn

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm pretty much with Tony in the magnitude of expectations department, and will say I'm rather surprised at the morning SWODY1, honestly. There are ways for this to bust, but that's true of all but a few events per decade. In my mind, there's at least a 50% chance this day will be remembered decades from now. Currently in Council Bluffs trying to decide how long we can hedge between the warm sector/WF cells east versus the arcing front late.

 

I'm with you guys on this.  The instability and shear parameters (both deep and low-level) are very impressive, and the HRRR has consistently put out a string of discrete supercells.  The dryline stuff starting in eastern NE and heading into western/central IA I think is going to be the main significant/violent tornado threat, given the instability that's built up just ahead of it and the stronger deep-layer shear, although the warm front is a pretty decent play as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6hr projection off the mesoanalysis ***time sensitive*** of the effective sig tor and 0-3km CAPE surface vorticity

 

stpc_23.gif

 

3cvr_23.gif

Pretty strong signals torward Western IA of any supercell having a very good potential of a strong tornado associated with them around 21 to 23z.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...