Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,611
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

Significant Severe Weather Threat Friday 10/4


tornadotony

Recommended Posts

This is honestly probably the most significant fall severe weather threat I can recall since maybe October 2007, perhaps even November 2005 (will probably exceed 11/29/10 IMO).  It's not every day you see a good EML ride up above a warm sector with huge, looping hodographs and 65°F or higher sfc dewpoints.  The main questions IMO are still low track and speed, which will likely affect the location of the greatest threat moreso than the level of threat itself.  Verbatim the GFS has a significant threat over much of IA, while the faster NAM has an extremely impressive threat focused over SE MN/NE IA/SW WI.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 504
  • Created
  • Last Reply

The timing is in question as the models have consistently been slowing down. Now the Euro doesn't even bring the low into SW Iowa until 6z Saturday. The whole evolution of this thing is probably going to change, but at face value, the 12z NAM and GFS were quite impressive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Replying to Tornadotony

 

Remember the Octobomb of 2010, many tornadoes and wind damage reports

 

http://www.spc.noaa.gov/climo/reports/101026_rpts.html

This shows 402 storm reports

 

69 confirmed tornadoes, according to Wikipedia, for the October 23-27 time period

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/October_2010_North_American_storm_complex

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Replying to Tornadotony

 

Remember the Octobomb of 2010, many tornadoes and wind damage reports

 

http://www.spc.noaa.gov/climo/reports/101026_rpts.html

This shows 402 storm reports

 

69 confirmed tornadoes, according to Wikipedia

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/October_2010_North_American_storm_complex

 

 

None of them were higher than EF2...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As Quincy alluded to, 12z ECMWF really threw a curveball with a dramatically slower solution. Friday's threat would be centered more over E NE/W IA verbatim. Curious that none of the other 12z modeling looks remotely similar in terms of slowing down, so I'll wait until tonight before giving this much weight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As Quincy alluded to, 12z ECMWF really threw a curveball with a dramatically slower solution. Friday's threat would be centered more over E NE/W IA verbatim. Curious that none of the other 12z modeling looks remotely similar in terms of slowing down, so I'll wait until tonight before giving this much weight.

Slower could mean a longer snow event... I like warm weather in October.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This almost looks like a repeat of earlier this spring with a strong anafront surging south. If that verifies I don't anticipate this being a sig threat if the dryline is cut off with that surging front. Timing is obviously an issue, however.

None of the models have yet to show that exact solution...Though the 12z ECMWF did go towards that direction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This almost looks like a repeat of earlier this spring with a strong anafront surging south. If that verifies I don't anticipate this being a sig threat if the dryline is cut off with that surging front. Timing is obviously an issue, however.

 

Yeah I was thinking this same thing concerning the 12z Euro, 2013 trends die hard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This almost looks like a repeat of earlier this spring with a strong anafront surging south. If that verifies I don't anticipate this being a sig threat if the dryline is cut off with that surging front. Timing is obviously an issue, however.

 

The surging front is almost certainly going to be an issue further south. The area near the surface low is where the most significant threat will be (as long as crapvection doesn't ruin everything).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is honestly probably the most significant fall severe weather threat I can recall since maybe October 2007, perhaps even November 2005 (will probably exceed 11/29/10 IMO).  It's not every day you see a good EML ride up above a warm sector with huge, looping hodographs and 65°F or higher sfc dewpoints.  The main questions IMO are still low track and speed, which will likely affect the location of the greatest threat moreso than the level of threat itself.  Verbatim the GFS has a significant threat over much of IA, while the faster NAM has an extremely impressive threat focused over SE MN/NE IA/SW WI.

 

Funny you bring up October 2007, 00z CIPS analog centered on the Great Lakes at 120hr out, that event was the top analog, 12z it did fall down the list a bit though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

00z GFS coming in with an 80-90 kt H5 jet max rounding the base of the trough 18z Friday.

 

Verbatim...Eastern NE and much of IA look to get lit up. LLJ is already 40+ kts over IA at 21z, intensifying to 50 kts by 00z. More importantly model continuity wise, the GFS appears to be maintaining its timing. That sweet spot on the nose of the incoming H5 jet looks very impressive.

 

r3xd.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My interpretation: GFS looks impressive both Thu-Fri (more conditional on the former). NAM looks iffy for both, though even it may slam E IA/SE MN/SW WI on Friday afternoon. I know many will cling to the "NAM worthless outside 36" meme, but I'm weighing its solution about 75% for now and assuming a more progressive verification than the GFS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My interpretation: GFS looks impressive both Thu-Fri (more conditional on the former). NAM looks iffy for both, though even it may slam E IA/SE MN/SW WI on Friday afternoon. I know many will cling to the "NAM worthless outside 36" meme, but I'm weighing its solution about 75% for now and assuming a more progressive verification than the GFS.

I wouldn't be so sure, Re: NAM meme. The NAM is still playing catch-up, with a decent shift slower between the 12/0z runs.

 

I do agree though that things will probably be more progressive than the GFS...Probably an average of the GFS/NAM.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My interpretation: GFS looks impressive both Thu-Fri (more conditional on the former). NAM looks iffy for both, though even it may slam E IA/SE MN/SW WI on Friday afternoon. I know many will cling to the "NAM worthless outside 36" meme, but I'm weighing its solution about 75% for now and assuming a more progressive verification than the GFS.

 

Not sure Brett... dprog/dt is favoring a slower solution and the GFS/ECMWF combo trumps >36 hr NAM any day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ughh... 0Z Euro continues to trend towards the anafront scenario with a more strung out surface low. Could throw a major curveball here.

Why are we really putting much stock in the Euro?  First it's the fastest model, then it's the slowest, now it's the weakest...once it actually has a run that is consistent with its previous run, maybe I'll think about it.  Until then, the GFS and NAM are starting to line up pretty well, and each run, the threat level on them only goes up.  And even with the Euro solution, you'd still have significant severe convection over ern NE and IA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why are we really putting much stock in the Euro?  First it's the fastest model, then it's the slowest, now it's the weakest...once it actually has a run that is consistent with its previous run, maybe I'll think about it.  Until then, the GFS and NAM are starting to line up pretty well, and each run, the threat level on them only goes up.  And even with the Euro solution, you'd still have significant severe convection over ern NE and IA.

 

I completely agree with this, the fact that the Euro has no run to run consistency is a big tell. I wouldn't entirely toss it but I certainly wouldn't base my forecast upon it either. The GFS has had very good run to run consistency with the synoptic scale features other than it has been slowing down a touch as we have gone day to day. As you stated though with respect to Euro, it still has significant potential to it, only the ceiling isn't as high as the GFS and NAM solutions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 30/12z NAM holds true to the 30/0z run taking the surface low west of MSP..  It really wants to clock the area from Albert Lea, Owatonna east to Rochester MN.  0-3 km helicity  approaching 500, with 0-1km up to 250.

Yeah the forcasted shear/instability combo along the IA/MN border Friday is jawdropping, especially the low-level turning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah the forcasted shear/instability combo along the IA/MN border Friday is jawdropping, especially the low-level turning.

 

 

Albert Lea area at 00z Saturday

 

NAM_12_060_43.64;-93.31.gif

 

The amount of speed and directional shear in the lowest 75mb is really incredible as you stated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While the Euro may be a bit out to lunch with its depiction, I think we can agree that there is at least a subtle trend slower/further west. The 12z NAM and GFS both showed this, yet still seem to be highlighting Iowa and surrounding areas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While the Euro may be a bit out to lunch with its depiction, I think we can agree that there is at least a subtle trend slower/further west. The 12z NAM and GFS both showed this, yet still seem to be highlighting Iowa and surrounding areas.

Yeah the 12z GFS has slowed a touch more, centering the potential from Lincoln NE to Des Moines IA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Euro will be interesting. The Canadian stopped from the slower trend and is actually closer to the NAM/GFS now.

 

Not sure I agree entirely on the 12z Canadian. It still has the H5 low centered at Cheyenne by 00z Sat and the surface low is in south-central NE. Also, verbatim, no warm sector QPF by that time. It's hard to imagine a cap bust Friday -- the extreme slow end of the guidance envelope would have to win out. If we're converging on something close to the 12z GFS, that may be the most ominous scenario, putting OMA-DMX in play with late afternoon initiation likely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...