Ginx snewx Posted October 2, 2013 Share Posted October 2, 2013 awful poster This sub form is so much easier to read without LL. Hopefully they break the "so called promise" He posts in your subforum? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted October 2, 2013 Share Posted October 2, 2013 He's not coming back. ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ, what does a weatherman do when every week is the same? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tropopause_Fold Posted October 2, 2013 Share Posted October 2, 2013 nice analog list for Mid October on ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted October 2, 2013 Author Share Posted October 2, 2013 ? Take out 91,99 and 2006. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted October 2, 2013 Share Posted October 2, 2013 Take out 91,99 and 2006.last half of October cool downs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted October 2, 2013 Share Posted October 2, 2013 ?cool down Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tropopause_Fold Posted October 2, 2013 Share Posted October 2, 2013 Take out 91,99 and 2006. and 58-59 wasn't spectacular...big finish over the interior though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tropopause_Fold Posted October 2, 2013 Share Posted October 2, 2013 cool down ah. thought you were referring to the winters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted October 2, 2013 Share Posted October 2, 2013 and 58-59 wasn't spectacular...big finish over the interior thoughLol not for winter, end of October Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CT Rain Posted October 2, 2013 Share Posted October 2, 2013 If you've noticed Jerry and Ginx have stopped posting huge winter and snow and cold wire to wire like they had been. They've backed off due to worry ,conflicting signs Why don't we move this kind of stupid Kevin talk to the banter thread lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CT Rain Posted October 2, 2013 Share Posted October 2, 2013 ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ, what does a weatherman do when every week is the same? Take a break from the wx. It's boring. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted October 2, 2013 Author Share Posted October 2, 2013 Well the 1st half of this month is heading to an all out torch for sure. A little unsure about the second half..but don't have confidence in big cooling. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted October 2, 2013 Share Posted October 2, 2013 Take a break from the wx. It's boring.what I am trying to figure out is why ESRL took down their climate data set website because of the shutdown Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORH_wxman Posted October 2, 2013 Share Posted October 2, 2013 and 58-59 wasn't spectacular...big finish over the interior though '58-'59 was an absolutely frigid winter, but it wasn't that good for snow along the coast. Cold and dry much of the heart of winter. March '59 was huge for snow in the interior. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORH_wxman Posted October 2, 2013 Share Posted October 2, 2013 Well the 1st half of this month is heading to an all out torch for sure. A little unsure about the second half..but don't have confidence in big cooling. I kind of envision an average to slightly below average last 2 weeks of the month...it doesn't look like the pattern will be ideal for getting big cold ala Oct 2009. A lot can still change though. If we end up with better ridging near AK, then it certainly could end up colder. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted October 2, 2013 Author Share Posted October 2, 2013 I kind of envision an average to slightly below average last 2 weeks of the month...it doesn't look like the pattern will be ideal for getting big cold ala Oct 2009. A lot can still change though. If we end up with better ridging near AK, then it certainly could end up colder. Some of the stat models...like Paul Roundy's stuff is trying to cool it. I would buy more of what you are saying vs a big cooldown. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SJonesWX Posted October 2, 2013 Share Posted October 2, 2013 That's another story...the oil issue is beyond all of us and we both know how difficult that is to weed off no matter how much people care. I'm aware of all the credits etc to do this work, but still requires out of pocket funds that someone like me doesn't have. There are two categories. Most people probably don't care about AGW not because they don't give a phuck, but because there isn't much they can do. On the other hand, as far as our physical environment goes where people work and play, I think people generally care and do what they can to help out. For instance...something as simple as organic fertilizer instead of high phosphate crap like Kevin puts on his lawn. the fact that environmentally friendly stuff costs 2x what other stuff costs is a reason why many don't do it. take the Prius for example. even with the tax credits, they are arguably more expensive than a non-hybrid car. add in the cost of replacing the batteries every few years and it is certainly more expensive. same with solar panels. i would have gone solar many years ago if it was not so expensive. $$ talks to most ppl. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
radarman Posted October 2, 2013 Share Posted October 2, 2013 With respect to the shutdown and the govt computers... You notice we are getting DNS redirects... so in other words, it's not as though they replaced their normal website with a banner... in fact it's relinking you a different machine altogether. I heard speculation earlier that the machines were obviously still running... they may still be running but we can't say for sure. They could be offline. Machines in NOAA server rooms are subject to an extreme amount of security regulations and even on a good day the IT folks are hard pressed to keep everything going. So my guess is they are operating on skeleton crews and took all but the most important sites off the general internet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted October 2, 2013 Author Share Posted October 2, 2013 One thing to remember it only takes one big TC in either the WPAC and ATL to play around with the pattern. That certainly cannot be figured out this early. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dryslot Posted October 2, 2013 Share Posted October 2, 2013 I save the worry for the 36 hours before a MECS that's not showing me getting a sh*tload of qpf. 55.0/53 We know you do, If november comes in a s a torch, I will raise an eyebrow Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weathafella Posted October 2, 2013 Share Posted October 2, 2013 The sites are down because they likely were instructed to take everything that can generate a penny of cost (electricity, data charges) off line. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted October 2, 2013 Share Posted October 2, 2013 One thing to remember it only takes one big TC in either the WPAC and ATL to play around with the pattern. That certainly cannot be figured out this early.just storm after storm lining up out there Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobbutts Posted October 2, 2013 Share Posted October 2, 2013 With respect to the shutdown and the govt computers... You notice we are getting DNS redirects... so in other words, it's not as though they replaced their normal website with a banner... in fact it's relinking you a different machine altogether. I heard speculation earlier that the machines were obviously still running... they may still be running but we can't say for sure. They could be offline. Machines in NOAA server rooms are subject to an extreme amount of security regulations and even on a good day the IT folks are hard pressed to keep everything going. So my guess is they are operating on skeleton crews and took all but the most important sites off the general internet. government can't even shut down a website properly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Allsnow Posted October 2, 2013 Share Posted October 2, 2013 He's not coming back. Awesome news! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted October 2, 2013 Share Posted October 2, 2013 Awesome news!hard to imagine a life so bitter and full of hate. Enjoy the sunsational day. Viva la summers return. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobbutts Posted October 2, 2013 Share Posted October 2, 2013 The sites are down because they likely were instructed to take everything that can generate a penny of cost (electricity, data charges) off line. That's not what radarman described, he's saying the systems are online, but dns has changed. It appears nothing is offline. The bandwidth and power would be reduced, but not as much as shutting the systems. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted October 2, 2013 Share Posted October 2, 2013 That's not what radarman described, he's saying the systems are online, but dns has changed. It appears nothing is offline. The bandwidth and power would be reduced, but not as much as shutting the systems.political play Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tropopause_Fold Posted October 2, 2013 Share Posted October 2, 2013 With respect to the shutdown and the govt computers... You notice we are getting DNS redirects... so in other words, it's not as though they replaced their normal website with a banner... in fact it's relinking you a different machine altogether. I heard speculation earlier that the machines were obviously still running... they may still be running but we can't say for sure. They could be offline. Machines in NOAA server rooms are subject to an extreme amount of security regulations and even on a good day the IT folks are hard pressed to keep everything going. So my guess is they are operating on skeleton crews and took all but the most important sites off the general internet. the idea of shutting off certain websites is ridiculous. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
radarman Posted October 2, 2013 Share Posted October 2, 2013 That's not what radarman described, he's saying the systems are online, but dns has changed. It appears nothing is offline. The bandwidth and power would be reduced, but not as much as shutting the systems. Well, what I'm saying is we know dns has changed. We don't know if stuff is online. By killing the connection to the general internet any bandwidth consumption will be drastically reduced. Also the need for ongoing security is lessened significantly. And sure the machines use power but unless we are expecting a very long shutdown it might be more expensive to power everything off. The ramp back up to full ops is long and may contain surprises. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted October 2, 2013 Share Posted October 2, 2013 If they are shutting off servers then there are going to be issues with restart. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.