Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,609
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

Winter 2013-2014


Rainshadow

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 353
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I posted this question in the MA forum too, but does anyone know what is the physical reason why a year with a rapid increase in snow cover would produce better Arctic blocking than a year with steady above normal snow cover? It seems to me that both paths would generally lead to more efficient building of pressures in the high latitudes than a year with low snow cover.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I posted this question in the MA forum too, but does anyone know what is the physical reason why a year with a rapid increase in snow cover would produce better Arctic blocking than a year with steady above normal snow cover? It seems to me that both paths would generally lead to more efficient building of pressures in the high latitudes than a year with low snow cover.

Could be that the snow cover is partly a byproduct of a certain pattern which is conducive to snow further south down the road, instead of a direct cause of a snowy pattern.  Don't know, but its what pops into my head. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I posted this question in the MA forum too, but does anyone know what is the physical reason why a year with a rapid increase in snow cover would produce better Arctic blocking than a year with steady above normal snow cover? It seems to me that both paths would generally lead to more efficient building of pressures in the high latitudes than a year with low snow cover.

This is highly speculative, but my guess is that rapid increase of snow cover has a latent variable that is the true cause of the relationship.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

First 20 days of Oct at phl. ouch.

 

AVERAGE MONTHLY: 65.3 DPTR FM NORMAL: 5.9 

 

So another "mode conflict" October as there is no way that Eurasian snow cover is going to average less than average for the month.  Same as last October.  Here are the other Octobers and winter enso states: 1968 (nino), 1970 (nina), 1971 (nina), 1973 (nina), 1993 (neutral), 1998 (nina), 2001 (neutral), 2010 (nina) & 2012 (neutral).  The enso states that have a chance this winter I bolded, The others (moderate or greater) IMO are too strong in either direction.

 

CFS2 current output, they are currently outlooking a borderline enso neutral/weak el nino for the winter with warmer departures east of 3.4.  Its also near the warmest end of the dynamical and statistical models overall, the dynamicals are enso neutral positive, the statisticals, enso neutral negative. The raw SSTA anomalies though dont look as bad in the rest of the Pacific and Indian Oceans. The Atlantic, not so good.  They dont have a 500mb anomaly chart, but it almost looks like a stronger positive PNA winter as we go along with an eventual negative NAO east for what all of that is worth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So another "mode conflict" October as there is no way that Eurasian snow cover is going to average less than average for the month. Same as last October. Here are the other Octobers and winter enso states: 1968 (nino), 1970 (nina), 1971 (nina), 1973 (nina), 1993 (neutral), 1998 (nina), 2001 (neutral), 2010 (nina) & 2012 (neutral). The enso states that have a chance this winter I bolded, The others (moderate or greater) IMO are too strong in either direction.

CFS2 current output, they are currently outlooking a borderline enso neutral/weak el nino for the winter with warmer departures east of 3.4. Its also near the warmest end of the dynamical and statistical models overall, the dynamicals are enso neutral positive, the statisticals, enso neutral negative. The raw SSTA anomalies though dont look as bad in the rest of the Pacific and Indian Oceans. The Atlantic, not so good. They dont have a 500mb anomaly chart, but it almost looks like a stronger positive PNA winter as we go along with an eventual negative NAO east for what all of that is worth.

Split flow ice storms... Or 35 and rain. Take our pick!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yea, could be. However, 93-94 was pretty anomalous. All depends on how everything plays out. 93-94 had a an Atlantic so bad that it wS actually good. (Fast flow, no blocking). But because it sagged far enough south with the huge PV anomaly, the flow of storms were quick, cold hitters.

Gut tells me that the Atlantic might not coop this year. If so, the pacific is gonna need to rock, otherwise fuggedaboutit

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yea, could be. However, 93-94 was pretty anomalous. All depends on how everything plays out. 93-94 had a an Atlantic so bad that it wS actually good. (Fast flow, no blocking). But because it sagged far enough south with the huge PV anomaly, the flow of storms were quick, cold hitters.

Gut tells me that the Atlantic might not coop this year. If so, the pacific is gonna need to rock, otherwise fuggedaboutit

 

Have to see how deep the snow cover gets north of our area in November and December.  While we were getting soaking rains in Nov/Dec 1993, they were getting buried in snow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yea, could be. However, 93-94 was pretty anomalous. All depends on how everything plays out. 93-94 had a an Atlantic so bad that it wS actually good. (Fast flow, no blocking). But because it sagged far enough south with the huge PV anomaly, the flow of storms were quick, cold hitters.

Gut tells me that the Atlantic might not coop this year. If so, the pacific is gonna need to rock, otherwise fuggedaboutit

That year had a -epo which was the source for all the cold which was directed at the US

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So another "mode conflict" October as there is no way that Eurasian snow cover is going to average less than average for the month.  Same as last October.  Here are the other Octobers and winter enso states: 1968 (nino), 1970 (nina), 1971 (nina), 1973 (nina), 1993 (neutral), 1998 (nina), 2001 (neutral), 2010 (nina) & 2012 (neutral).  The enso states that have a chance this winter I bolded, The others (moderate or greater) IMO are too strong in either direction.

 

CFS2 current output, they are currently outlooking a borderline enso neutral/weak el nino for the winter with warmer departures east of 3.4.  Its also near the warmest end of the dynamical and statistical models overall, the dynamicals are enso neutral positive, the statisticals, enso neutral negative. The raw SSTA anomalies though dont look as bad in the rest of the Pacific and Indian Oceans. The Atlantic, not so good.  They dont have a 500mb anomaly chart, but it almost looks like a stronger positive PNA winter as we go along with an eventual negative NAO east for what all of that is worth.

 I would take that and let that play out. Only thing is though, it looks like the AO should average out this to above normal. Seems like their is a decent correlation with october AO's and how it pans out the rest of the winter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 I would take that and let that play out. Only thing is though, it looks like the AO should average out this to above normal. Seems like their is a decent correlation with october AO's and how it pans out the rest of the winter.

 

 

I think the correlation for October - DJF AO is an inverse one, so it's better to have a +AO right now. Same goes with the NAO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Could be that the snow cover is partly a byproduct of a certain pattern which is conducive to snow further south down the road, instead of a direct cause of a snowy pattern.  Don't know, but its what pops into my head. 

 

 

This is highly speculative, but my guess is that rapid increase of snow cover has a latent variable that is the true cause of the relationship.

 

 

Good thoughts. Definitely an interesting topic of research.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does anyone have a link to the site where you can plot severla years and or months and look at the patterns. Here is the example of what im trying to find. Though i want to be able to plug in different dates where like snow storms occurred and different patterns

 

 

bfac544c3d89afad04c72ba179438a2a.jpg

 

Not sure if this is what you're looking for: 

 

http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd/data/correlation/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Many forecasts have hinted at a mild first half of winter and then colder and stormier from late January onward.

 

Well you have similar October temperature departures, snow cover advance and sorry Atlantic as we did heading into last winter (which at least by temperatures was like last winter). But the Pacific looks better than last fall and the number of hemispheric recurving tropical systems I believe is down from last winter. That sounds like colder shots even if it contradicts my :wub: for October. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well you have similar October temperature departures, snow cover advance and sorry Atlantic as we did heading into last winter (which at least by temperatures was like last winter). But the Pacific looks better than last fall and the number of hemispheric recurving tropical systems I believe is down from last winter. That sounds like colder shots even if it contradicts my :wub: for October. 

At least with colder shots we have a better chance  of snow :santa:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So another "mode conflict" October as there is no way that Eurasian snow cover is going to average less than average for the month.  Same as last October.  Here are the other Octobers and winter enso states: 1968 (nino), 1970 (nina), 1971 (nina), 1973 (nina), 1993 (neutral), 1998 (nina), 2001 (neutral), 2010 (nina) & 2012 (neutral).  The enso states that have a chance this winter I bolded, The others (moderate or greater) IMO are too strong in either direction.

 

CFS2 current output, they are currently outlooking a borderline enso neutral/weak el nino for the winter with warmer departures east of 3.4.  Its also near the warmest end of the dynamical and statistical models overall, the dynamicals are enso neutral positive, the statisticals, enso neutral negative. The raw SSTA anomalies though dont look as bad in the rest of the Pacific and Indian Oceans. The Atlantic, not so good.  They dont have a 500mb anomaly chart, but it almost looks like a stronger positive PNA winter as we go along with an eventual negative NAO east for what all of that is worth.

 

Pretty much a cutter pattern with the se ridge basking in glory if you run it against the 30 yr avg since 81

 

cd7112363312977269prcp_zps0651764e.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...