Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,619
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    RyRyB
    Newest Member
    RyRyB
    Joined

The Pattern Ahead


ORH_wxman

Recommended Posts

Spare me the fooking lectures, dude; it's my prerogative to set my expectations where I see fit and the FACT of the matter is that that system was an anomaly in that the precip field shredded to sh** so readily.

Will would tell you the same thing.

Now, has this been a "good" winter, so far looking at it objectively....yes.

Lol..man can you be a pouty little girl sometimes

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

The difference being that what I am saying is true.

:snowman:

I'll bet anyone right now that Kev won't wee an anafrontal inch....analfrontal several, different story.

Even if we do manage .1'' of QPF after h85 goes below freezing, isn't the BL going to be too warm? And even if it is snow, it's never going to stick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jeez you folks are grouchy today...

I'm quite happy with my melting 7" of snow attm... Blizz and Ray need to get a room at Pete's house during one of his snowstorms. CPick can join them.

The only problem is that Ray got more than Pete did this past storm (well not by much). We all should have been about 10-15 mi NW of Pete in the last storm.

The one good thing we can guarantee is that the pattern is back to below average after this brief mild spell. We'll have our chances. I just hope its not dry with too much vortex suppression just north of us. Past patterns have given us some great storms, and hopefully this one will too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How do you get anal frontal when it's in the back? Never mind........ CF passage NBD, day six on, then clippers and a nice 6-10 shot.

Semantics aside, it's crap....whatever it is.

I just want the 1990's back:

Dec 1992- 22"

March 1993- 15" accompanied by the fiercest blizz conditions that I'll ever see here.

Jan 1996- 20"

April 1997- 30"; 'nuff said

Dec 1997- 16" in one of the monst intense snowbombs that you will ever bare witness to

March 2001- 20"

Since March 2001:

PD II- Analfrontal 1'

Dec 2003- Analfrontal 1'

Jan 2005- 25"...hallowed groound only 2nd to April 1997

Dec 2005- analagous to Dec 1997

Feb 2006- 16'....ok

Dec 2009- Analfrontal 10"

Feb 2010- Analfrontal tearing

March 2010- Analfrontal tearing

Dec 2010' Analfrontal 1' (see PD II and Dec 2003)

Seems like every KU has only given me 1' this decade, except for Jan 2005.

Boston saw HECS totals in PD II, Dec 2003 and Dec 2010.....Taunton....all of those, + Dec 2009.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only problem is that Ray got more than Pete did this past storm (well not by much). We all should have been about 10-15 mi NW of Pete in the last storm.

The one good thing we can guarantee is that the pattern is back to below average after this brief mild spell. We'll have our chances. I just hope its not dry with too much vortex suppression just north of us. Past patterns have given us some great storms, and hopefully this one will too.

I'm sure we'll get something to track in the coming week or so. Long range gfs and ec look like 2010 in some ways but it wouldn't take much to get one of those disturbances to do something more than shear out or get shunted too far south.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Coastal KU" s rock, man the coast has pawned the interior lately, all those years of ball busting has come back to haunt the interior snobs, in your face haunting by the much maligned coastal crew.

Absolutely....immediate coast has owned this decade, which is terrible for me because I'm immediately NW of them......in the subsidence exhaust..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...