Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,606
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    ArlyDude
    Newest Member
    ArlyDude
    Joined

Farmers Almanac


Momza

Recommended Posts

Let's see what happens. I have lots of experience with the Farmers Almanac and the accuracy it has is okay, but not amazing. It's like looking at the ECMWF/GFS at Days 10-15. 

But I feel like based on climatology most people could take a stab in the dark and be pretty accurate. If I say the day of the superbowl will be partly cloudy with highs between 35 and 45 I have a pretty decent chance of being right based on absolutely nothing but taking the average of the past 30 super bowl sundays in our area.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But I feel like based on climatology most people could take a stab in the dark and be pretty accurate. If I say the day of the superbowl will be partly cloudy with highs between 35 and 45 I have a pretty decent chance of being right based on absolutely nothing but taking the average of the past 30 super bowl sundays in our area.

It doesn't hurt that a large percentage of the KU storms are around that time, after the January thaw and before the late February warmup.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As long as we stay in a Nina phase I would call it a crapshoot for our area. The Gulf of Alaska is warmer than years past so that seems like a good development. Overall, it looks more exciting now for New England than here (surprise, surprise). But it's only Labor Day.

I agree about the warm Gulf of Alaska, but I'd like to see some cooling south of the Aleutians to promote more of an Aleutian low and +PDO pattern. That allows for a +PNA as well as EPO ridging over Alaska to bring the cold onto the North American side.

We look to be headed towards a weak Nina or cold neutral ENSO state which can really go either way in our area...we have some blockbusters in that state like 66-67 and 95-96 as well as some dead ratters like 11-12. A lot depends on the NAO, which is nearly impossible to predict this far out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

 

 

Yep, so if it's a torch, both books will have some serious explaining to do. I've gotten the Old farmer's almanac since the early 2000s, and while from this range I think it's generally guesswork, they have had a surprising number of hits in terms of the winter forecast (most namely, 2002-03, 2001-02 hit the warm winter, 2003-04, 2007-08, and 2009 through 2011).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep, so if it's a torch, both books will have some serious explaining to do. I've gotten the Old farmer's almanac since the early 2000s, and while from this range I think it's generally guesswork, they have had a surprising number of hits in terms of the winter forecast (most namely, 2002-03, 2001-02 hit the warm winter, 2003-04, 2007-08, and 2009 through 2011).

I have almanacs going back to 1966-67...I might have to get rid of them when I move...I know they nailed the early 70's snow wise...the one thing they did get right in 1995-96 was 'precipitation above average along the coast'...with that in mind why did they go with less snow than average?...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have almanacs going back to 1966-67...I might have to get rid of them when I move...I know they nailed the early 70's snow wise...the one thing they did get right in 1995-96 was 'precipitation above average along the coast'...with that in mind why did they go with less snow than average?...

Missed the blocking?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...