Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,584
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    LopezElliana
    Newest Member
    LopezElliana
    Joined

2nd Half of August WX Discussion


Quincy

Recommended Posts

Exactly, ski resorts always pull this kind of crap but the amounts hey reported was staggering.

Huntermtn.blogspot.com/2010_02_01_archive.html

Hey now on the ski resorts pulling this crap ;)

Honestly in this age of social media, a ski resort would be stupid to knowingly inflate totals. That's why I take photos of my measurements at Stowe, haha. Even the 1-3" dusting a on the snow board I'll take photos of. I remember one day last year folks were calling us out (folks not at the mountain) on FB saying there's no way we had what we had...so I printed off something with a date and time, went out to the snow board, and took a pic that was posted to FB. The response was awesome...people loved the fact that someone at Stowe saw that message, walked outside, and came back in with proof.

But I may be more anal about snow measurements than others...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Hey now on the ski resorts pulling this crap ;)

Honestly in this age of social media, a ski resort would be stupid to knowingly inflate totals. That's why I take photos of my measurements at Stowe, haha. Even the 1-3" dusting a on the snow board I'll take photos of. I remember one day last year folks were calling us out (folks not at the mountain) on FB saying there's no way we had what we had...so I printed off something with a date and time, went out to the snow board, and took a pic that was posted to FB. The response was awesome...people loved the fact that someone at Stowe saw that message, walked outside, and came back in with proof.

But I may be more anal about snow measurements than others...

You (Stowe) are one of the few ski resorts that frequently underreport snow amounts. Besides for resorts inflating amounts they also sugar coat the conditions and the iciest days become "a little firm but very edgeable" (again, excluding Stowe) Sorry to veer so off topic but this weather pattern blows!!!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The VT reading surprises me because they had a pretty decent period of taint. Though I'm sure they probably got orographic enhancement even after the storm occluded.

Regardless, some monstrous totals happened in elevated areas during that. But I'm skeptical of stuff over 6 feet unless its got some solid proof with it...there's always a couple weenie readings in big events where you immediately put the skeptic hat on. Doesn't mean they are always wrong, but frequently they are.

Found some legit totals from CBS 6 in Albany for the period Feb 23-28, 2010...

Potter Hollow, NY...64.0" (Albany County, 1300ft)

Woodford, VT...62" (Bennington County, 2100ft)

Berne, NY...57.8" (Albany County, 1500ft)

Savoy, MA....57" (Berkshire County, 2000ft)

Greenville, NY...53.3" (Green County)

Halcott, NY...51.0" (Green County)

These are just a sample and don't include ski area amounts. Knowing the difference between like 3,500-4000ft (like Hunter summit) and what falls at like 1,500ft, it's not out of the question that above 3,000ft on the peaks where precip efficiency is maximized there were amounts over 72". I mean we often see a 30% increase in QPF between 4000ft and 1500ft on Mansfield...not uncommon in big storms with juice to see like 5" QPF fall at the COOP at the summit vs. like 3.5" at 1500ft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But I'm thinking of the right storm right? I actually love those screaming soueasters . Those always produce the most tree damage since trees aren't used to that kind of pressure from that wind direction.

Those events always deliver. Never any inversion nonsense ;)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You (Stowe) are one of the few ski resorts that frequently underreport snow amounts. Besides for resorts inflating amounts they also sugar coat the conditions and the iciest days become "a little firm but very edgeable" (again, excluding Stowe) Sorry to veer so off topic but this weather pattern blows!!!

A ski resort is still a business so no one is ever going to really say don't come today (might as well just close if you say that), but luckily up here we have to deal with that a lot less than areas south of us or outside the upslope region. It is very rare that we do a thaw/rainstorm then flash freeze with no snow on the backside. There is almost always at least a 2-4" upslope response when the cold air comes in (rainstorms leave a lot of residual surface moisture for NW flow to act on behind the cold front), and some of our biggest upslope events can come on the backside of a thaw, where there's leftover moisture, strong CAA, and usually strong H85 NW winds. That's sort of northern VT's biggest advantage over ski areas in southern VT or NH or the Adirondacks...the ability to produce natural snow quickly after a thaw. Even 2-4" followed by a night of grooming can really make a world of difference in surface conditions following a thaw/freeze cycle.

The only way we get porked up here is those situations where cold is as advected in on like SW winds from central NY. Then we don't get the upslope and get the block-of-ice-after-a-thaw type experience. It's a little nuance to pay attention to after a thaw if you are thinking about skiing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Those events always deliver. Never any inversion nonsense ;)

The March 2010 wind event for NYC and SW CT along with Sandy all features similar processes. Semi warm such that the right forward quadrant of the storm featured a pocket of low level warmer air and then almost immediate cold air advection aloft to destabilize and mix down winds aloft. Not very common but can happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...