Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,588
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    LopezElliana
    Newest Member
    LopezElliana
    Joined

Greenland 2013


LithiaWx

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 252
  • Created
  • Last Reply

It looks like we made it back to the edge of the SD line today.

However the seasonal total is heading out of the SD range. This range is for 1990-2011.

So this benign melt season is shaping up to finish at least 2SD below normal. We are about 20GT from being below the bottom of the SD line for the season.

8QkdEuJ.png?1

Tomorrow is another warm day.

IV6aa4A.png?1

This season has been benign compared to 2012, I am not sure why that word and subtitle to this thread gets to you so badly. one more day of warmth (today) and then it gets colder and colder and more favaorable for the GIS. Enjoy your last warm day for a while Friv, the cold is moving in if the Euro and GFS are correct.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The end is near.  Or so we hope.  The melt season has been in high gear for a while now.  And continues to roll on and push this year which features much much more favorable weather for a weak melt season is turning out to be one of the worst. 

 

We are in the third week in a row of very high melt days. 

 

 

KSvosaD.png?1?3008

 

The NAO has done GIS like Brutus did Ceaser.  Like Rick James did Charlie Murphy and like Charlie Murphy did Rick James.  Smacked, Stabbed, kicked, dirty couch yeah all of it.  It digs in a bit deeper for a while.

 

 

 

 

 

5itNgeC.gif?1

 

Tomorrow is another day at torch-fest 2013.  As the ridge strengthens.  Models have trended more North and West of GIS with the ridge, which is welcomed news for the medium to long range.

 

 

 

51KPZqU.png?1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another huge melt day.  Well below the 2SD range.  the average loss today is about -1.25GT.  We saw -7.25GT. 

 

I think it will slow down soon.

 

TwU1ePA.png?1

 

 

Tomorrow is very warm over the SW side.  While some cooler air is pulled down the East Coast.  but it's probably going to make no difference.  The large ridge over the Western Side will provide ample clear skies over the main melt regions for a late season bonanza.  Not to mention these temps are way above normal.

 

 

 

iAgnvBj.png?1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another warm day on tap for GIS.  Southern GIS will see Freeze levels well up into the 2000M+ range.

 

NW GIS/W GIS also above freezing.

 

 

At 00z:

 

Western GIS freeze level 3000M.

Southern GIS freeze level 3000M.

Se GIS 2200M.

Easrtern GIS at 70N. 1250M.

NE GIS 875M.

NW GIS 1900M.

 

 

 

46b93e5e-92b0-4bc8-8f22-212ff666b3d7_zps

 

 

Night vision beautifully shows us where the main melt regions are and subsequent lower albedo.

 

Eastern GIS has been fairly active this year.  But during this long stretch of around or below -2SD melt days we can see the SW/WSW GIS ice sheet has seen it's albedo lowered substansially.

 

We are lucky this pattern showed up so late.

 

89b11869-8409-4492-8829-0f3c07739543_zps

 

 

But we are still progged to see a -NAO for a while and get deeper the next couple days.

 

kd2CXIi.gif?1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another warm day on tap for GIS. Southern GIS will see Freeze levels well up into the 2000M+ range.

NW GIS/W GIS also above freezing.

At 00z:

Western GIS freeze level 3000M.

Southern GIS freeze level 3000M.

Se GIS 2200M.

Easrtern GIS at 70N. 1250M.

NE GIS 875M.

NW GIS 1900M.

46b93e5e-92b0-4bc8-8f22-212ff666b3d7_zps

Night vision beautifully shows us where the main melt regions are and subsequent lower albedo.

Eastern GIS has been fairly active this year. But during this long stretch of around or below -2SD melt days we can see the SW/WSW GIS ice sheet has seen it's albedo lowered substansially.

We are lucky this pattern showed up so late.

89b11869-8409-4492-8829-0f3c07739543_zps

But we are still progged to see a -NAO for a while and get deeper the next couple days.

kd2CXIi.gif?1

I am not aware of the significance of the NAO on the GIS the current NAO state is weak as well.

The cold starts today and builds from here on according to the models.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well below 2012 and should be coming to a screeching halt shortly. Also a net gain of ice for the season so far.

attachicon.gifimage.jpg

 

You are forgetting (or ignoring) the fact that those plots are only for melting and do not include GIS mass loss due to glacial calving.  A recent study by Bolch et al [source] put the mass loss due to calving at around 41 Gton/year.  Hardly insignificant.

 

And while you are correct that the 2013 melt season has been well below 2012, it has also been well above the long-term average.  I don't see any reason to be smug or celebratory.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The streak had to end sometime. 19 consecutive -NAO summer months was off the charts.

 

2006 1.27 -0.51 -1.28 1.24 -1.14     0.84 0.90 -1.73 -1.62 -2.24 0.44 1.34
2007 0.22 -0.47 1.44 0.17 0.66      -1.31 -0.58 -0.14 0.72 0.45 0.58 0.34
2008 0.89 0.73 0.08 -1.07 -1.73    - 1.39 -1.27 -1.16 1.02 -0.04 -0.32 -0.28
2009 -0.01 0.06 0.57 -0.20 1.68     -1.21 -2.15 -0.19 1.51 -1.03 -0.02 -1.93
2010 -1.11 -1.98 -0.88 -0.72 -1.49  -0.82 -0.42 -1.22 -0.79 -0.93 -1.62 -1.85
2011 -0.88 0.70 0.61 2.48 -0.06     -1.28 -1.51 -1.35 0.54 0.39 1.36 2.52
2012 1.17 0.42 1.27 0.47 -0.91       -2.53 -1.32 -0.98 -0.59 -2.06 -0.58 0.17
2013 0.35 -0.45 -1.61 0.69 0.57       0.52 0.67

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are forgetting (or ignoring) the fact that those plots are only for melting and do not include GIS mass loss due to glacial calving.  A recent study by Bolch et al [source] put the mass loss due to calving at around 41 Gton/year.  Hardly insignificant.

 

And while you are correct that the 2013 melt season has been well below 2012, it has also been well above the long-term average.  I don't see any reason to be smug or celebratory.

  

Yeah Marietta....stop with the champagne and confetti!  Way over the top.....

Phillip, it is my prerogative to be joyful of news that doesn't devastate the ice. I don't find major melt exciting like others do. I find joy in looking at the positives when possible. We are at a net gain for the year, that is all that should matter right now. The GIS wasn't demolished or rolled up and smoked (not my choice of words) like it was in 2012. That is a fantastic outcome. It could have been a horrible season and it wasn't. Take the wins where you can get them as this season was a victory much like the arctic and Antarctic sea ice was this season.

LEK, you're invited over for the Greenland didn't get rolled up and smoked like 2012 party. I also have a balloon drop planned for this event. I'm tentatively scheduling It for when the GIS starts adding on mass again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The streak had to end sometime. 19 consecutive -NAO summer months was off the charts.

 

2006 1.27 -0.51 -1.28 1.24 -1.14     0.84 0.90 -1.73 -1.62 -2.24 0.44 1.34

2007 0.22 -0.47 1.44 0.17 0.66      -1.31 -0.58 -0.14 0.72 0.45 0.58 0.34

2008 0.89 0.73 0.08 -1.07 -1.73    - 1.39 -1.27 -1.16 1.02 -0.04 -0.32 -0.28

2009 -0.01 0.06 0.57 -0.20 1.68     -1.21 -2.15 -0.19 1.51 -1.03 -0.02 -1.93

2010 -1.11 -1.98 -0.88 -0.72 -1.49  -0.82 -0.42 -1.22 -0.79 -0.93 -1.62 -1.85

2011 -0.88 0.70 0.61 2.48 -0.06     -1.28 -1.51 -1.35 0.54 0.39 1.36 2.52

2012 1.17 0.42 1.27 0.47 -0.91       -2.53 -1.32 -0.98 -0.59 -2.06 -0.58 0.17

2013 0.35 -0.45 -1.61 0.69 0.57       0.52 0.67

 

 

 

it's also pretty ugly though.  There are pretty clear fundamental changes taking place that 2013 has shown us are pretty powerful in the ice melting business. 

 

The colder +NAO regime that will be 70-80% of this Summer melt season wasn't enough to prevent 2013 from likely reaching within 85% or better of the 2013 Summer ice mass loss.

 

It wasn't very long ago major torching Summers with -NAOs would not come near that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The streak had to end sometime. 19 consecutive -NAO summer months was off the charts.

 

2006 1.27 -0.51 -1.28 1.24 -1.14     0.84 0.90 -1.73 -1.62 -2.24 0.44 1.34

2007 0.22 -0.47 1.44 0.17 0.66      -1.31 -0.58 -0.14 0.72 0.45 0.58 0.34

2008 0.89 0.73 0.08 -1.07 -1.73    - 1.39 -1.27 -1.16 1.02 -0.04 -0.32 -0.28

2009 -0.01 0.06 0.57 -0.20 1.68     -1.21 -2.15 -0.19 1.51 -1.03 -0.02 -1.93

2010 -1.11 -1.98 -0.88 -0.72 -1.49  -0.82 -0.42 -1.22 -0.79 -0.93 -1.62 -1.85

2011 -0.88 0.70 0.61 2.48 -0.06     -1.28 -1.51 -1.35 0.54 0.39 1.36 2.52

2012 1.17 0.42 1.27 0.47 -0.91       -2.53 -1.32 -0.98 -0.59 -2.06 -0.58 0.17

2013 0.35 -0.45 -1.61 0.69 0.57       0.52 0.67

 

 

 

it's also pretty ugly though.  There are pretty clear fundamental changes taking place that 2013 has shown us are pretty powerful in the ice melting business. 

 

The colder +NAO regime that will be 70-80% of this Summer melt season wasn't enough to prevent 2013 from likely reaching within 85% or better of the 2013 Summer ice mass loss.

 

It wasn't very long ago major torching Summers with -NAOs would not come near that.

probably just a new measuring method.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  

Phillip, it is my prerogative to be joyful of news that doesn't devastate the ice. I don't find major melt exciting like others do. I find joy in looking at the positives when possible. We are at a net gain for the year, that is all that should matter right now. The GIS wasn't demolished or rolled up and smoked (not my choice of words) like it was in 2012. That is a fantastic outcome. It could have been a horrible season and it wasn't. Take the wins where you can get them as this season was a victory much like the arctic and Antarctic sea ice was this season.

LEK, you're invited over for the Greenland didn't get rolled up and smoked like 2012 party. I also have a balloon drop planned for this event. I'm tentatively scheduling It for when the GIS starts adding on mass again.

 

How do you figure that there has been a net gain for 2013?  Here is the latest GIS mass balance plot from polarportal.org [source]:

 

Mass_tot_Small_en.png

 

As anyone can see, Greenland has already lost nearly 300Gtons (300 km3) of ice this year.  Which is less than the nearly 500 Gtons lost in 2012, but isn't a net gain by any stretch of the data.  

 

Just to put this year's ice loss into perspective - the GIS ice lost to date is enough to cover the entire District of Columbia to a depth of about 1,800 meters.  So knock yourself out if you feel that's reason enough to party.  Please excuse me for feeling the GIS melting is serious, and not a cause for celebration.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How do you figure that there has been a net gain for 2013? Here is the latest GIS mass balance plot from polarportal.org [source]:

Mass_tot_Small_en.png

As anyone can see, Greenland has already lost nearly 300Gtons (300 km3) of ice this year. Which is less than the nearly 500 Gtons lost in 2012, but isn't a net gain by any stretch of the data.

Just to put this year's ice loss into perspective - the GIS ice lost to date is enough to cover the entire District of Columbia to a depth of about 1,800 meters. So knock yourself out if you feel that's reason enough to party. Please excuse me for feeling the GIS melting is serious, and not a cause for celebration.

melt is typically measured september 1 to august 31. net gain in that timeframe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah, cherrypicking - now I understand your position. Silly me, I was using ALL of the available data.

That is not cherry picking. Use your head and think about it. If we measuered from January 1 to December 31 it would still be a gain once we get to 12/31.

I was actually using more data than you were. What date do you start and stop the clock.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it's also pretty ugly though.  There are pretty clear fundamental changes taking place that 2013 has shown us are pretty powerful in the ice melting business. 

 

The colder +NAO regime that will be 70-80% of this Summer melt season wasn't enough to prevent 2013 from likely reaching within 85% or better of the 2013 Summer ice mass loss.

 

It wasn't very long ago major torching Summers with -NAOs would not come near that.

 

This summer so far has been much cooler than the 2007-2012 due to the flip in the NAO.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The arctic regions have been much cooler this year compared to recent years. However, the ice has been damaged from consecutive years of "warm" weather, so even a cooler Summer isn't going to bring us back to 1980s ice extent. I get the feeling from some people here that unless we ended with a 6.0 mil extent that there's no good news as far as the extent goes. No matter what happens from this point forward, the ice would have to recover yearly from the damage that was done in the past years. If the next ten years featured cooler than normal arctic temps, the ice would gradually recover with more MYI each year. However, even in this situation it would take many years to get us back to 1980s extent. I think we've seen this year that a cooler arctic can definitely result in a yearly gain in sea ice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is no where near a net gain any year in the last decade.

g-fig5.19.jpg

I am pretty sure this was a projection not actual data and you have been asked to source this multiple times. Since you choose not to it is worthless in my eyes until I see a source. It may or may not be legit but until it is sourced it is suspect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am pretty sure this was a projection not actual data and you have been asked to source this multiple times. Since you choose not to it is worthless in my eyes until I see a source. It may or may not be legit but until it is sourced it is suspect.

Consider the temperature anomalies over Greenland and the -NAO of years past, definitely no signs of GIS gaining net ice mass. As well as the numerous empirical evidence through videos and images of calving ice and massive melt ponds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...