Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,586
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    LopezElliana
    Newest Member
    LopezElliana
    Joined

July high heat WX disco


CapturedNature

Recommended Posts

Then why have the criteria at all? We've had more uncomfortable days. I would like to think that thought went into these advisory/warning criteria. If the criteria is totally arbitrary/subjective than why have it. 

 

Or at least lower it... haha.   Heh, but it is pretty clear that the value is more "pseudo-subjective", than totally so.  

 

The formula for calculating HI goes by

 
HI = -42.379 + 2.04901523T + 10.14333127R - 0.22475541TR - 6.83783x10-3T2- 5.481717x10-2R2
 + 1.22874x10-3T2R + 8.5282x10-4TR2
 - 1.99x10-6T2R2
 
T = temperature (F)
R = relative humidity (integer percentage).
 
The explaination later states "Because this equationis obtained by multiple regression analysis, the heat index value (HI) has an error
of ±1.3°F. Even though temperature and relative humidity are the only two variables in the equation, all
the variables on the lists above are implied.
 
That may be the key, right there... that + or - 1.3 margin for error.   If we get the HI sitting at 98 or 99 for 2 to 3 hours, that may just be acceptable in error and "close enough" to hoist the advisory.   Like wise, if it is 102 or 103  ?   Cutting it too close "for comfort" - pun intended!  haha
 
Seriously though, since the formula is regressed and has the margin for error, that's code for subjective. But more importantly, the margin for error would quite logically require that if it's close they have to pull the trigger.   At least, this would be a good defense. 
 
Aside, there were 2 to 3 hours of 100 to 104 in CT and Mass today, so I'm not sure bust applies to today.  Maybe in that warning area, but again ... given the closeness on the dial...
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

They do the same thing with the first one inch snowfall of the season when they issue a snow advisory. If we're going to be accepting of that practice, then I guess what they're doing with all these heat advisories/warnings is OK too. I guess it's the spirit, if not the letter, of the criteria that matters, critical success index and all those other verification/skill metrics be damned.

 

Yeah I don't really understand the point. Unfortunately it leads to an "overwarning" situation. Now a day where heat index values will be >110 (like the '95 event) will have the same "warning" as a day that had ~100 or ~101 HI values.

 

The consistency between offices is a problem too. BOX had the warning yet the highest values (again) were in OKX's CT zones. Unless all the offices are on the same page we shouldn't begin blurring the lines.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah I don't really understand the point. Unfortunately it leads to an "overwarning" situation. Now a day where heat index values will be >110 (like the '95 storm) will have the same "warning" as a day that had ~100 or ~101 HI values.

 

The consistency between offices is a problem too. BOX had the warning yet the highest values (again) were in OKX's CT zones. Unless all the offices are on the same page we shouldn't begin blurring the lines.

I maxed out at 109 today at work and it felt it, pretty impressive, I better post a pic of my siting though

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah I don't really understand the point. Unfortunately it leads to an "overwarning" situation. Now a day where heat index values will be >110 (like the '95 storm) will have the same "warning" as a day that had ~100 or ~101 HI values.

The consistency between offices is a problem too. BOX had the warning yet the highest values (again) were in OKX's CT zones. Unless all the offices are on the same page we shouldn't begin blurring the lines.

Agree

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agree

I really can not see the difference working, feeling, being out side in a HI of 100 or 108, its freaking miserable and life sucking. How about one warning that says, yo mofos its gonna be freaking hot out for the next three days, be careful, drink water and get inside AC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really can not see the difference working, feeling, being out side in a HI of 100 or 108, its freaking miserable and life sucking. How about one warning that says, yo mofos its gonna be freaking hot out for the next three days, be careful, drink water and get inside AC.

.

Except that there is actually a physiological response from your body. Cooling mechanisms begin to slow and eventually fail. There's a big difference between an HI of 100 and 108

Link to comment
Share on other sites

.

Except that there is actually a physiological response from your body. Cooling mechanisms begin to slow and eventually fail. There's a big difference between an HI of 100 and 108

 

Seeing those 88/75 temps brought back horrific memories of working on the Cape in August. I think I'm not along when I say that 88/75 is a lot worse than 94/68 or something like that. Basically the higher the dewpoint is per degree above 70, the exponentially worse it seems.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice, two light rain showers and a sea-breeze boundary later, and it's 82 at my place.  DP is still too drippy but at least it isn't 95!  

 

Also, I saw two micro rope funnels sticking out of the side of the TCU's when these rains showers came overhead today.  They were nicely side lit by the sun.   Those happen far more commonly than folks may think. I see a handful of them every summer.  They are probably no more than a several hundred feet long, and about 10 feet in diameter, and they stick out of the mid TCU depths out into the clear air.  They tend to be partially transparent with only weakly condensate tubular forms.   Fun personal little nerdly thing I look for...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...