Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,584
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    LopezElliana
    Newest Member
    LopezElliana
    Joined

July high heat WX disco


CapturedNature

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I find it LOL that you don't. It's a change, numerous mets spelled it out.

 

  

 

Numerous Mets spelled out nothing -- I gave reasoning, they gave disagreement - fact, and motivated in no small part on the fact that they represent a collective bias to favor cooler regimes, and it affects their objectivity. 

 

The NAO domain is not changing appreciably enough to warrant a permanent suppression along the East Seaboard with regard to the latitude of the westerlies.  Until that happens, the baser canvas pattern has not changed, and it is far more likely it is merely a relaxation interval.   And it is an untrue argument that the NAO doesn't modulate NE's circulation in the summer, if you are thinking about coming back with that. 

 

But you won't read that, or read it the right way. 

 

Think what you want to think ...fine.  And, for the record, I never said it was NOT a pattern change... If you bother to take your head out of your ass and stop trying to be subversively disrespectful and insulting (within the confines of Forum decorum).   I said proceed with caution.

All this contrarian agenda over merely saying proceed with caution and here's why?    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It doesn't look far off from the ensembles. It gets warmer and more humid late next week as the airmass is stagnant and we await the next trough moving in by the weekend.

 

I would take this Euro run...we actually get some showery cool weather in middle of next week before a return to more normal temps at the end of the week with another front about to move in.

 

The biggest change we see vs the first half of this month is low height anomalies over SE Canada vs the well above avg height anomalies we've seen. That will help get fronts south of us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Numerous Mets spelled out nothing -- I gave reasoning, they gave disagreement - fact, and motivated in no small part on the fact that they represent a collective bias to favor cooler regimes, and it affects their objectivity. 

 

The NAO domain is not changing appreciably enough to warrant a permanent suppression along the East Seaboard with regard to the latitude of the westerlies.  Until that happens, the baser canvas pattern has not changed, and it is far more likely it is merely a relaxation interval.   And it is an untrue argument that the NAO doesn't modulate NE's circulation in the summer, if you are thinking about coming back with that. 

 

But you won't read that, or read it the right way. 

 

Think what you want to think ...fine.  And, for the record, I never said it was NOT a pattern change... If you bother to take your head out of your ass and stop trying to be subversively disrespectful and insulting (within the confines of Forum decorum).   I said proceed with caution.

All this contrarian agenda over merely saying proceed with caution and here's why?    

 

You missed the entire point as Will stated. You are on a time scale much larger than mine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would take this Euro run...we actually get some showery cool weather in middle of next week before a return to more normal temps at the end of the week with another front about to move in.

 

The biggest change we see vs the first half of this month is low height anomalies over SE Canada vs the well above avg height anomalies we've seen. That will help get fronts south of us.

Look I am not into getting into pissing matches but when I posted the same thing on July 1th there were lots of skeptics but you agreed with me back then. Its a change and of course that does not mean summer disappears it just means things are moving again, more frequent fronts and less stagnation. The other factor: high heat days and heat waves are non entities for the near future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Look I am not into getting into pissing matches but when I posted the same thing on July 1th there were lots of skeptics but you agreed with me back then. Its a change and of course that does not mean summer disappears it just means things are moving again, more frequent fronts and less stagnation. The other factor: high heat days and heat waves are non entities for the near future.

 

That's all we've been saying for the last few days. I guess this isn't a regime change.

 

 

post-33-0-79741200-1374088384_thumb.gif

 

 

 

post-33-0-34922000-1374088395_thumb.gif

 

 

 

post-33-0-96622400-1374088402_thumb.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You missed the entire point as Will stated. You are on a time scale much larger than mine.

 

 

So how can you laugh at my argument regarding a pattern change when it was Will and I that came to that conclusion?  

 

Stop trying to debase me dude.  

 

I didn't MISS any point;  we (Will and I) came to the conclusion, mutually, that we were talking about two different time periods.

 

All I said was that at small time scales, oscillations in the field may appear to be a pattern change, but may won't hold up out in time; proceed with caution.

 

That is purely objective and you and Phil have been running around on the heels of everything I post nicking and trying to erode the value of that truth.  

 

Just stop.  I'm getting to where I can't trust you.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So how can you laugh at my argument regarding a pattern change when it was Will and I that came to that conclusion?  

 

Stop trying to debase me dude.  

 

I didn't MISS any point;  we (Will and I) came to the conclusion, mutually, that we were talking about two different time periods.

 

All I said was that at small time scales, oscillations in the field may appear to be a pattern change, but may won't hold up out in time; proceed with caution.

 

That is purely objective and you and Phil have been running around on the heels of everything I post nicking and trying to erode the value of that truth.  

 

Just stop.  I'm getting to where I can't trust you.  

 

I think you are backtracking a bit, but that's fine. My point all along has been that it's a change. Period. Can it come back, of course...but it's a change. You seem that it's only some sort of oscillatory issue and I'm not sure I agree. It's fine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So how can you laugh at my argument regarding a pattern change when it was Will and I that came to that conclusion?  

 

Stop trying to debase me dude.  

 

I didn't MISS any point;  we (Will and I) came to the conclusion, mutually, that we were talking about two different time periods.

 

All I said was that at small time scales, oscillations in the field may appear to be a pattern change, but may won't hold up out in time; proceed with caution.

 

That is purely objective and you and Phil have been running around on the heels of everything I post nicking and trying to erode the value of that truth.  

 

Just stop.  I'm getting to where I can't trust you.  

i don't know why you have to keep calling it a pattern change when it's clearly not a pattern change. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So you aren't arguing that it is not a pattern change? :huh:

You seem pretty passionate about this not being a pattern change...but there's no need for emotions in weather, only in WAR.

 

Nah, no passion.   I never said it was not a pattern change.   Not sure what is so complicated and you don't get.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you are backtracking a bit, but that's fine. My point all along has been that it's a change. Period. Can it come back, of course...but it's a change. You seem that it's only some sort of oscillatory issue and I'm not sure I agree. It's fine.

 

No way!  

 

You never read what I said objectively, period. 

 

It's not a change if you are in a 40-day period and that oscillates/sloshes the same way.  Real, profound pattern changes requires the kind of paradigm shift that doesn't return to the same base-line state -- next week is too soon to see if that is the case.

 

This is basic synoptic Met.  I learned this in college, in FAST.  I

 

I'm done... if you don't know this, you have no excuse. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ORH dropped back to 88F at 19z...the 6 hour high through 18z was 89F, so I don't think they hit 90F though it spossible they did before it snuck back down to 88F in that one hour. We'll see if they do at 4pm.

 

Today's wind direction is tougher for ORH to hit 90F on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No way!  

 

You never read what I said objectively, period. 

 So basically you are saying this is one small oscillation in a sea of WAR?  In winter, you could have a two week period of colder wx amid a torch winter and I would still consider it a change. I guess we're just coming at it from different angles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i don't know why you have to keep calling it a pattern change when it's clearly not a pattern change. 

 

 

i don't know why you have to keep posting when you contribute pretty much no Meteorological insight, and when you do, it's dubious and used as point of aversarial content.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i don't know why you have to keep posting when you contribute pretty much no Meteorological insight, and when you do, it's dubious and used as point of aversarial content.

i just hide in the bushes waiting for you to saying something foolish...and then pounce. doesn't take long. 

 

edit: that's not a word. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I heard months and months of high dews until November....Maybe just month and month?  lol

 

Meanwhile, still waiting for my first 90° reading this heatwave.  My temp has been hovering at 88° for several hours but we have several more hours and days to go.

 

lol, yeah up to 89 now here, could be very close to 90 today...

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 So basically you are saying this is one small oscillation in a sea of WAR?  In winter, you could have a two week period of colder wx amid a torch winter and I would still consider it a change. I guess we're just coming at it from different angles.

 

 

Yup, and more importantly, it is too soon to know that is relaxation or more profounder of a change for next week.  As I told Will, I agree that it is a short duration alteration that will have a decent effect on the sensible weather.   But for now, that is all.

 

What happens if the 00z runs come out tonight showing a new WAR node getting ready to do the same old thing?  Pattern change?   that's tough to swallow.   I don't know that it won't. 

 

It seems there is a reticence to accept that a given pattern can often have internal oscillations that don't reflect a governing regime change. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...