Weathergun Posted June 12, 2013 Share Posted June 12, 2013 The GFS looks even more disjointed than the NAM. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mupawxnut Posted June 12, 2013 Share Posted June 12, 2013 Wonder if the Euro will have some of the feedback issues that the rest of the 12z models are having. Sticking with Euro and previous runs of GFS, if trend continues then the 12z suite might be onto something.Even if there is a south trend, I think the GFS is still too far south. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snywx Posted June 12, 2013 Share Posted June 12, 2013 It's looking like most of us will be in somewhat of a "dead zone" between the really severe activity south of us and the heavy stratiform rain north of us, with the low tracking about directly overhead. I'd say a windy, showery day with the potential for a line of storms later tomorrow will be what most of us experience. This is looking like I-90 gets the heaviest rain. It would probably be wrist-slitting time if this were a winter system. I think you meant I-84 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluewave Posted June 12, 2013 Share Posted June 12, 2013 The GFS looks even more disjointed than the NAM. The RGEM continues to track the low just south of LI like the Euro has been doing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IsentropicLift Posted June 12, 2013 Author Share Posted June 12, 2013 It actually tried to form a secondary low, what the hell... Yeah, I think we may have to wait as long as tonights 00z runs till we can get a good grasp on exactly what the outcome will be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WE GOT HIM Posted June 12, 2013 Share Posted June 12, 2013 Like I said yesterday. This is a winter storm in June, so it figures the models would start going crazy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mupawxnut Posted June 12, 2013 Share Posted June 12, 2013 Anyone think TWC will give this a name? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WE GOT HIM Posted June 12, 2013 Share Posted June 12, 2013 Anyone think TWC will give this a name? lolol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stormlover74 Posted June 12, 2013 Share Posted June 12, 2013 Anyone think TWC will give this a name? lol I thought this was a joke but I wouldn't put anything past them...they probably have something in the works to start naming tornadoes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IsentropicLift Posted June 12, 2013 Author Share Posted June 12, 2013 Anyone think TWC will give this a name? Banned Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluewave Posted June 12, 2013 Share Posted June 12, 2013 So it's the UK and GFS vs the NAM/RGEM so far today. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mupawxnut Posted June 12, 2013 Share Posted June 12, 2013 So it's the UK and GFS vs the NAM/RGEM so far today. 130612161204456189000.gif Can you post QPF from the UKMET? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mupawxnut Posted June 12, 2013 Share Posted June 12, 2013 So it doesn't look so bad for tomorrow anymore, a lot less rainfall and severe weather stays south. Amazing how quickly the models changed in one run a day ahead of it, this is why they seriously need those upgrades because it's a joke. Let's wait for the Euro before making that call. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluewave Posted June 12, 2013 Share Posted June 12, 2013 Can you post QPF from the UKMET? I don't have the total, but I am going to wait until I see the Euro in a few hours. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jm1220 Posted June 12, 2013 Share Posted June 12, 2013 The models may be having a hard time resolving the convective aspects to the storm, which is likely throwing off its precipitation parameters. Although it's not winter anymore, the same errors may be present. The low might be shifting south again a bit on some of the models, which would put us back in the heavy stratiform rain area. It makes sense to me that there will be a very heavy band of stratiform rain due to the warm, moist air being uplifted, and all of it being squeezed out via overrunning. I doubt there won't be a very heavy band somewhere that generates several inches of rain. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluewave Posted June 12, 2013 Share Posted June 12, 2013 The models may be having a hard time resolving the convective aspects to the storm, which is likely throwing off its precipitation parameters. Although it's not winter anymore, the same errors may be present. The low might be shifting south again a bit on some of the models, which would put us back in the heavy stratiform rain area. It makes sense to me that there will be a very heavy band of stratiform rain due to the warm, moist air being uplifted, and all of it being squeezed out via overrunning. I doubt there won't be a very heavy band somewhere that generates several inches of rain. It's not everyday that such a deep low forms in conjunction a strong MCS on a High Risk day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluewave Posted June 12, 2013 Share Posted June 12, 2013 12Z MODEL EVALUATION INCLUDING THE NAM/GFS/UKMET AND GEM REGIONAL ...SHORTWAVE TROUGH/SURFACE LOW CURRENTLY EJECTING ACROSS THE NORTHERN PLAINS/UPPER MIDWEST...REACHING THE MID-ATLANTIC/SOUTHERN NEW ENGLAND THURS... PREFERENCE: NON-ECMWF CONSENSUS LED BY THE 12Z UKMET CONFIDENCE: AVERAGE OVERWHELMINGLY THE TREND IN THE 12Z GUIDANCE IS TO BE MORE PROGRESSIVE WITH THE EVOLVING SHORTWAVE TROUGH AND ASSOCD SFC LOW SEEN NOW MOVING ACROSS THE UPPER MIDWEST. THE MODELS TAKE THIS ENERGY RAPIDLY INTO THE OH VLY OVERNIGHT AND ALLOW FOR ADDITIONAL SHORTWAVE ENERGY DROPPING DOWN FROM ONTARIO TO REINFORCE THE HT FALLS AS THE SYS MOVES ACROSS THE CNTRL APPALACHIANS...MID-ATLANTIC AND SRN NEW ENGLAND ON THURS. THE 12Z GFS AND 12Z UKMET ARE THE FASTEST FOLLOWED BY THE 12Z NAM AND 12Z GEM REGIONAL. IT SHOULD BE NOTED THAT THE MODELS LATE THURS AND THURS EVE SUGGEST SOME REDEVELOPMENT OF THE SFC LOW FARTHER SOUTH DOWN OVER THE CHESAPEAKE BAY AREA BEFORE EXITING OFFSHORE SOUTH OF NEW ENGLAND THURS NIGHT...AFTER INITIALLY CROSSING THROUGH OH/PA. THE 12Z GFS REDEVELOPS THIS LOW FARTHEST SOUTH. THE 12Z GEM REGIONAL AND 12Z NAM ARE A BIT FARTHER NORTH. THE 00Z ECMWF FOR ITS PART...IS BY FAR A SLOW OUTLIER...AND IS ALREADY TOO SLOW WITH THE CURRENT LOW PLACEMENT OVER THE MIDWEST. AS A RESULT...ITS MASS FIELDS WILL NOT BE PREFERRED. THEREFORE BASED ON THE LATEST AVAILABLE GUIDANCE AND TRENDS...WILL FAVOR A NON-ECMWF CONSENSUS LED BY THE 12Z UKMET WHICH SPLITS THE LATITUDINAL PLACEMENT OF THE SFC LOW OVER THE MID-ATLANTIC REGION BETWEEN THE GEM REGIONAL/NAM AND THE GFS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mupawxnut Posted June 12, 2013 Share Posted June 12, 2013 12Z MODEL EVALUATION INCLUDING THE NAM/GFS/UKMET AND GEM REGIONAL ...SHORTWAVE TROUGH/SURFACE LOW CURRENTLY EJECTING ACROSS THE NORTHERN PLAINS/UPPER MIDWEST...REACHING THE MID-ATLANTIC/SOUTHERN NEW ENGLAND THURS... PREFERENCE: NON-ECMWF CONSENSUS LED BY THE 12Z UKMET CONFIDENCE: AVERAGE OVERWHELMINGLY THE TREND IN THE 12Z GUIDANCE IS TO BE MORE PROGRESSIVE WITH THE EVOLVING SHORTWAVE TROUGH AND ASSOCD SFC LOW SEEN NOW MOVING ACROSS THE UPPER MIDWEST. THE MODELS TAKE THIS ENERGY RAPIDLY INTO THE OH VLY OVERNIGHT AND ALLOW FOR ADDITIONAL SHORTWAVE ENERGY DROPPING DOWN FROM ONTARIO TO REINFORCE THE HT FALLS AS THE SYS MOVES ACROSS THE CNTRL APPALACHIANS...MID-ATLANTIC AND SRN NEW ENGLAND ON THURS. THE 12Z GFS AND 12Z UKMET ARE THE FASTEST FOLLOWED BY THE 12Z NAM AND 12Z GEM REGIONAL. IT SHOULD BE NOTED THAT THE MODELS LATE THURS AND THURS EVE SUGGEST SOME REDEVELOPMENT OF THE SFC LOW FARTHER SOUTH DOWN OVER THE CHESAPEAKE BAY AREA BEFORE EXITING OFFSHORE SOUTH OF NEW ENGLAND THURS NIGHT...AFTER INITIALLY CROSSING THROUGH OH/PA. THE 12Z GFS REDEVELOPS THIS LOW FARTHEST SOUTH. THE 12Z GEM REGIONAL AND 12Z NAM ARE A BIT FARTHER NORTH. THE 00Z ECMWF FOR ITS PART...IS BY FAR A SLOW OUTLIER...AND IS ALREADY TOO SLOW WITH THE CURRENT LOW PLACEMENT OVER THE MIDWEST. AS A RESULT...ITS MASS FIELDS WILL NOT BE PREFERRED. THEREFORE BASED ON THE LATEST AVAILABLE GUIDANCE AND TRENDS...WILL FAVOR A NON-ECMWF CONSENSUS LED BY THE 12Z UKMET WHICH SPLITS THE LATITUDINAL PLACEMENT OF THE SFC LOW OVER THE MID-ATLANTIC REGION BETWEEN THE GEM REGIONAL/NAM AND THE GFS.Should the WFO's cancel the Flood Watches for the NYC area? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluewave Posted June 12, 2013 Share Posted June 12, 2013 UKMET: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WE GOT HIM Posted June 12, 2013 Share Posted June 12, 2013 12Z MODEL EVALUATION INCLUDING THE NAM/GFS/UKMET AND GEM REGIONAL...SHORTWAVE TROUGH/SURFACE LOW CURRENTLY EJECTING ACROSS THENORTHERN PLAINS/UPPER MIDWEST...REACHING THE MID-ATLANTIC/SOUTHERNNEW ENGLAND THURS...PREFERENCE: NON-ECMWF CONSENSUS LED BY THE 12Z UKMETCONFIDENCE: AVERAGEOVERWHELMINGLY THE TREND IN THE 12Z GUIDANCE IS TO BE MOREPROGRESSIVE WITH THE EVOLVING SHORTWAVE TROUGH AND ASSOCD SFC LOWSEEN NOW MOVING ACROSS THE UPPER MIDWEST. THE MODELS TAKE THISENERGY RAPIDLY INTO THE OH VLY OVERNIGHT AND ALLOW FOR ADDITIONALSHORTWAVE ENERGY DROPPING DOWN FROM ONTARIO TO REINFORCE THE HTFALLS AS THE SYS MOVES ACROSS THE CNTRLAPPALACHIANS...MID-ATLANTIC AND SRN NEW ENGLAND ON THURS. THE 12ZGFS AND 12Z UKMET ARE THE FASTEST FOLLOWED BY THE 12Z NAM AND 12ZGEM REGIONAL. IT SHOULD BE NOTED THAT THE MODELS LATE THURS ANDTHURS EVE SUGGEST SOME REDEVELOPMENT OF THE SFC LOW FARTHER SOUTHDOWN OVER THE CHESAPEAKE BAY AREA BEFORE EXITING OFFSHORE SOUTH OFNEW ENGLAND THURS NIGHT...AFTER INITIALLY CROSSING THROUGH OH/PA.THE 12Z GFS REDEVELOPS THIS LOW FARTHEST SOUTH. THE 12Z GEMREGIONAL AND 12Z NAM ARE A BIT FARTHER NORTH. THE 00Z ECMWF FORITS PART...IS BY FAR A SLOW OUTLIER...AND IS ALREADY TOO SLOW WITHTHE CURRENT LOW PLACEMENT OVER THE MIDWEST. AS A RESULT...ITS MASSFIELDS WILL NOT BE PREFERRED. THEREFORE BASED ON THE LATESTAVAILABLE GUIDANCE AND TRENDS...WILL FAVOR A NON-ECMWF CONSENSUSLED BY THE 12Z UKMET WHICH SPLITS THE LATITUDINAL PLACEMENT OF THESFC LOW OVER THE MID-ATLANTIC REGION BETWEEN THE GEM REGIONAL/NAMAND THE GFS. Wow Bold, should have waited for 12z EURO first... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian5671 Posted June 12, 2013 Share Posted June 12, 2013 Should the WFO's cancel the Flood Watches for the NYC area? Doubt it-we're still likely to see 2 inches of rain and we're sitting on saturated ground... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnoSki14 Posted June 12, 2013 Share Posted June 12, 2013 Should the WFO's cancel the Flood Watches for the NYC area? Why, a likely 1-3" is still probable with locally higher amounts and add on recent heavy rains and the flood risk still remains, the Ukmet still drops a lot of rain. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dsnowx53 Posted June 12, 2013 Share Posted June 12, 2013 Similar to the 4km which may be bumping the warm front and overrunning about 30 miles too far north. So I would slide the 4km rain shield about 30 miles south. ptot48.gif I share your thoughts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dsnowx53 Posted June 12, 2013 Share Posted June 12, 2013 The WPC is making the wrong move, here. The Ukie has an odd suppressed bias in the shorter range. I honestly think today's 12z NAM...perhaps slightly adjusted southward is the way to go. I was always skeptical for the NYC area for severe for reasons I have stated many times, but going all the way the other way before the Euro comes out is just plain silly. The NAM as a mesoscale model should be able to handle the location of boundaries pretty well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dsnowx53 Posted June 12, 2013 Share Posted June 12, 2013 Should the WFO's cancel the Flood Watches for the NYC area? The theoretical southward shift would put NYC back in the heavier rain threat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
earthlight Posted June 12, 2013 Share Posted June 12, 2013 The WPC is making the wrong move, here. The Ukie has an odd suppressed bias in the shorter range. I honestly think today's 12z NAM...perhaps slightly adjusted southward is the way to go. I was always skeptical for the NYC area for severe for reasons I have stated many times, but going all the way the other way before the Euro comes out is just plain silly. The NAM as a mesoscale model should be able to handle the location of boundaries pretty well. They definitely jumped a little bit with the GFS's solution. But it will come down to a matter of miles. I still think there's a big time wind/tornado threat along the warm front and south of it. At this point its just a matter of whether that front moves up north of Philly or not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mupawxnut Posted June 12, 2013 Share Posted June 12, 2013 They definitely jumped a little bit with the GFS's solution. But it will come down to a matter of miles. I still think there's a big time wind/tornado threat along the warm front and south of it. At this point its just a matter of whether that front moves up north of Philly or not.Is the heavy rain threat for NYC and the western suburbs still alive and well? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
earthlight Posted June 12, 2013 Share Posted June 12, 2013 Is the heavy rain threat for NYC and the western suburbs still alive and well? Nothing has changed in that regard. The best threat for heavy rain still seems to be a little north of NYC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mupawxnut Posted June 12, 2013 Share Posted June 12, 2013 Nothing has changed in that regard. The best threat for heavy rain still seems to be a little north of NYC.So do you think a NAM solution--with hardly any rain for NYC--will be what happens? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dsnowx53 Posted June 12, 2013 Share Posted June 12, 2013 They definitely jumped a little bit with the GFS's solution. But it will come down to a matter of miles. I still think there's a big time wind/tornado threat along the warm front and south of it. At this point its just a matter of whether that front moves up north of Philly or not. Agreed. I think the WF moves north of Philly, but won't get north of Central NJ...which is why you and I have been more focused on S NJ and SE PA than we have Central NJ itself...Central NJ is still a bit borderline for discrete, truly surface based convection, but may be on the northern fringe of it depending on exact WF placement. They're still in the game, but just do not have the same level of concern -- or perhaps more appropriately, there is more uncertainty there than for areas further south. I just really hope the WPC doesn't think that C NJ is out of the woods because of the GFS's south shift. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.