Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,586
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    23Yankee
    Newest Member
    23Yankee
    Joined

2013-14 MA Winter Disco - 'cause it's never too early.


Bob Chill

Recommended Posts

I plotted DCA snow vs snowcover extent (week 43, end of October-ish) from the Rutgers snow lab.  There is a very slight positive with increased Northern Hemisphere and Eurasian snowcover, but the R-squared is like 0.01.  North American snowcover has absolutely no bearing, with a completely flat slope. 

 

The big 4 (78/79, 02/03, 95/96, and 09/10) all had medium or high extents, but so did the stinkers of 97/98 and 72/73 and the last two years.

the stinkers you mentioned were strong NINOs, so that may explain why they are so high on the list

out of the 4 decent winters, 2 were also mod NINOs; I wonder how many neutral or NINA years weere high on the list other than 78/79 and 95/96 that you already mentioned?

my point (hope!) being, that high snow cover in none NINO years may have a higher correlation to decent snow in the coming winter

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

the stinkers you mentioned were strong NINOs, so that may explain why they are so high on the list

out of the 4 decent winters, 2 were also mod NINOs; I wonder how many neutral or NINA years weere high on the list other than 78/79 and 95/96 that you already mentioned?

my point (hope!) being, that high snow cover in none NINO years may have a higher correlation to decent snow in the coming winter

 

78-79 was a neutral following 2 ninos, in the formative years of a +PDO decadal shift

 

95-96 was an anomaly, but my theory is that it was weak enough and came on the heels of a 7 year warm/neutral period including a prior winter nino, so it had a serviceable southern stream..especially in February...plus it was in a strong +PDO regime

Link to comment
Share on other sites

78-79 was a neutral following 2 ninos, in the formative years of a +PDO decadal shift

 

95-96 was an anomaly, but my theory is that it was weak enough and came on the heels of a 7 year warm/neutral period including a prior winter nino, so it had a serviceable southern stream..especially in February...plus it was in a strong +PDO regime

 

I've been looking at 61-62 / 62-63 to find some clues. Basically neutral / neg-neutral years during a -pdo regime and 2 years removed from the last enso event (super weak nino 58-59) but 61-63 was post warm enso so that is a net negative. 

 

The period of 61-63 had a very favorable epo/wpo setup that allowed cold in the east but the AO cooperated except for Jan of 62 but that month wasn't warm in the east due to the pac helping deliver into the middle of the country that bled east. 

 

 

 

All this talk of a +AO winter seems a bit premature IMO. Time will tell the story there. 

 

The EPO has been solid - this month. I wouldn't be mad if that becomes a predominant feature this winter. No reason to rule it out yet. Heck, there is really nothing we can rule out except for a warm enso winter.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But CFSv2 has trended colder for eastern Canada and the Northeast over the last few runs.  Not sure how fruitful it is thinking about trends in the CFSv2, but it's there.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not really a death knell. There were 18 snowstorms with a positive AO versus about 32 with a positive NAO. Of those 32 positive NAO events about half came with a negative AO and a positive NAO. There were 44 negative AO events. I didn't break down the 8 inch or greater events the same way. I would guess they are even more heavily weighted towards having both a negative AO and NAO but I don't know that for sure.

In the graph, I'm reading the top left quadrant as indicating snowstorms of 4" or greater that occurred with a +AO and -NAO. Am I misreading it, Wes? I may be a little confused (which is far too easily done).

In any case, based on what you just said above, it certainly appears as though the AO is more the driver of snow in these parts than is the NAO. Of course, there are other factors involved, but if we were just looking at the AO/NAO, then it seems that the AO is the bigger player.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the graph, I'm reading the top left quadrant as indicating snowstorms of 4" or greater that occurred with a +AO and -NAO. Am I misreading it, Wes? I may be a little confused (which is far too easily done).

In any case, based on what you just said above, it certainly appears as though the AO is more the driver of snow in these parts than is the NAO. Of course, there are other factors involved, but if we were just looking at the AO/NAO, then it seems that the AO is the bigger player.

 

 

The top left is a positive AO and negative NAO as you noted. There are only three such events while there were 16 or so negative AO, positive NAO events.  I think the AO is even more important for the truly big events. I need to gather a list of DCA 8 inch or greater and map that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The SAI is pointing to an overall +AO this winter, and the research being done by the Italian guy who posted in the Forecasting and Discussion forum is indicating the same.

 

It looks like we might be getting some help from the Pacific this year - or at least more than we've gotten recently - so we may have that going for us.  And based on Wes's chart, we should probably be hoping for a generally +NAO, as well...which feels odd to say.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The SAI is pointing to an overall +AO this winter, and the research being done by the Italian guy who posted in the Forecasting and Discussion forum is indicating the same.

 

It looks like we might be getting some help from the Pacific this year - or at least more than we've gotten recently - so we may have that going for us.  And based on Wes's chart, we should probably be hoping for a generally +NAO, as well...which feels odd to say.

 

 

which in stupid people terms, means what?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...