Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,586
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    23Yankee
    Newest Member
    23Yankee
    Joined

2013-14 MA Winter Disco - 'cause it's never too early.


Bob Chill

Recommended Posts

I almost threw up

 

What happens when the GOA gets cold?  What will be the new 40N  justification for why we  will have a good winter here?

the same one as every year.....our bad luck has got to run out at some point

 

anyway, you weren't supposed to be looking at the N PAC, only enso  <insert blind as a bat emoticon here>  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

The problem for DC is that we are in the type of regime that was similar to like the 1948-1957 period...lots of Ninas or neturals with no potent Ninos in there during the initial 10 years of a shift to -PDO regime (much like we have shifted recently in the present).

From what I recall, that period was pretty lousy for DC too. When you get a potent El Nino in the -PDO regime, it will be great...much like '09-'10 was (also '57-'58, '65-'66)...if you can built some neutral winters after a potent Nino in a decadal -PDO regime, then that would probably give some better results for non-Nino years like the early 60s.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I almost threw up

What happens when the GOA gets cold? What will be the new 40N justification for why we will have a good winter here?

the same one as every year.....our bad luck has got to run out at some point

anyway, you weren't supposed to be looking at the N PAC, only enso

If the GOA gets cold before 10/1, we're all fukked. My entire premise is experimental with the GOA in September. It has worked but admittedly the sample size is weak.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem for DC is that we are in the type of regime that was similar to like the 1948-1957 period...lots of Ninas or neturals with no potent Ninos in there during the initial 10 years of a shift to -PDO regime (much like we have shifted recently in the present).

From what I recall, that period was pretty lousy for DC too. When you get a potent El Nino in the -PDO regime, it will be great...much like '09-'10 was (also '57-'58, '65-'66)...if you can built some neutral winters after a potent Nino in a decadal -PDO regime, then that would probably give some better results for non-Nino years like the early 60s.

 

you pretty much stated it perfectly

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem for DC is that we are in the type of regime that was similar to like the 1948-1957 period...lots of Ninas or neturals with no potent Ninos in there during the initial 10 years of a shift to -PDO regime (much like we have shifted recently in the present).

From what I recall, that period was pretty lousy for DC too. When you get a potent El Nino in the -PDO regime, it will be great...much like '09-'10 was (also '57-'58, '65-'66)...if you can built some neutral winters after a potent Nino in a decadal -PDO regime, then that would probably give some better results for non-Nino years like the early 60s.

 if you're right and history repeats, this year will be close to average at BWI

http://www.erh.noaa.gov/lwx/climate/bwi/bwisnow.txt

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm with u Mitch. I fully expect double what I got last year. It's going to be epic.

What are we supposed to do without a southern stream? I am trying to figure out a way we can have a big winter and I can't. It requires us to produce during the core of winter. One way is to get a split flow and faux southern stream a la jan 2000. But that was a really anomalous situation. We saw that pattern last winter. It doesn't have to produce a snowstorm that back in and dumps 2 feet on RDU.

Do we have any other reasonable options? Some sick, otherworldly block and we thread some crazy sh-it?

I'll be happy with 10-12" IMBY.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What are we supposed to do without a southern stream? I am trying to figure out a way we can have a big winter and I can't. It requires us to produce during the core of winter. One way is to get a split flow and faux southern stream a la jan 2000. But that was a really anomalous situation. We saw that pattern last winter. It doesn't have to produce a snowstorm that back in and dumps 2 feet on RDU.

Do we have any other reasonable options? Some sick, otherworldly block and we thread some crazy sh-it?

I'll be happy with 10-12" IMBY.

as long as you're with the Capital Weather Gang, you'll never allow yourself to dream weenie dreams again

anonymity has its perks!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

July/Aug mei came in at -.614...That's weak la nina territory...oni came in at -0.4...next month could warm a notch or stay steady...weekly oni was -0.1...Some mei analogs of hope...

1898-99......54" in DCA

1903-04......20" in DCA

1908-09......36" in DCA

1912-13......9" in DCA

1921-22.....42.5" in DCA

1945-46......24.5" in DCA

1949-50......3" DCA...

1962-63......21.4" in DCA

1974-75.....12.8" in DCA...

six snowy winters 20" or more...

one in the teens...

two under 10"...

enso near same state in Jan...

1898-99

1921-22

1962-63...

la nina develops...

1903-04

1908-09

1949-50

1974-75

if enso warms to near 0.0...

1912-13

1945-46

I'm betting the mei will be close to what it is now in January making the top three analogs pretty good for DCA...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What are we supposed to do without a southern stream? I am trying to figure out a way we can have a big winter and I can't. It requires us to produce during the core of winter. One way is to get a split flow and faux southern stream a la jan 2000. But that was a really anomalous situation. We saw that pattern last winter. It doesn't have to produce a snowstorm that back in and dumps 2 feet on RDU.

Do we have any other reasonable options? Some sick, otherworldly block and we thread some crazy sh-it?

I'll be happy with 10-12" IMBY.

I was just poking fun. 12" is 200% of last year in my yard. And that's what I honestly expect. And it will take 4+ events to get there.

A good block with a miller b'ish vort diving down could drop 4-6" area wide. A post frontal trailing wave could get us 3-5.

IMHO- a 6-10 event is totally off the table without a lucky strike with a perfect +pna -nao. No stj doesn't mean the gulf is closed. But this kind of event is an obvious fluke. It would surprise me if it happened or didn't happen. I won't make any calls like that until 8 hours after it stops snowing. LOL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Uncle, the problem with the top 3 analogs is that yes, we might hit those #'s precip wise but outside of the far nw burbs it will be more rain than those years. Average temp air masses nowadays just aren't the same anymore.

I don't know what the temp profiles were for the storms during those years but if any happened with temps AOA 30* then it would be rain today.

EDIT: Just want to add that every cell in my body hopes you're right. If you are I'll buy you a truck load of your favorite beer. If you don't drink I'll pay for a world class high end call girl.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Uncle, the problem with the top 3 analogs is that yes, we might hit those #'s precip wise but outside of the far nw burbs it will be more rain than those years. Average temp air masses nowadays just aren't the same anymore.

I don't know what the temp profiles were for the storms during those years but if any happened with temps AOA 30* then it would be rain today.

EDIT: Just want to add that every cell in my body hopes you're right. If you are I'll buy you a truck load of your favorite beer. If you don't drink I'll pay for a world class high end call girl.

at least you have all the vices covered Bob    :pimp:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Uncle, the problem with the top 3 analogs is that yes, we might hit those #'s precip wise but outside of the far nw burbs it will be more rain than those years. Average temp air masses nowadays just aren't the same anymore.

I don't know what the temp profiles were for the storms during those years but if any happened with temps AOA 30* then it would be rain today.

EDIT: Just want to add that every cell in my body hopes you're right. If you are I'll buy you a truck load of your favorite beer. If you don't drink I'll pay for a world class high end call girl.

 

Winter temps have warmed like half a degree to perhaps as much as a degree F in your neck of the woods since those days...its not a matter of a 30-31F snowstorm becoming a rainstorm now...that's way too much difference than has actually occurred. Cruddy storm tracks generally cause 34F rainstorms...not global warming between 1966 and 2013. The biggest difference is its harder to get absolutely brutally cold winters now and extreme arctic outbreaks. There's surely some effect on snow too, but 99% of it is storm tracks and the type of regime you are in.

 

Its been a pretty unfavorable regime recently ala late 40s to mid/late 1950s which was also pretty sucky in DC. Plenty of warm clunkers in there too. You get a few neutrals following a Nino, and you'll probably see the difference...and some +PDO winters. The correlation seems to be very high. Its hard to ignore the stats that zwyts put out on them...the sample isn't monstrous, but it isn't small either. It is large enough to be significant.

 

 

VAwinter_Temps.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Uncle, the problem with the top 3 analogs is that yes, we might hit those #'s precip wise but outside of the far nw burbs it will be more rain than those years. Average temp air masses nowadays just aren't the same anymore.

I don't know what the temp profiles were for the storms during those years but if any happened with temps AOA 30* then it would be rain today.

EDIT: Just want to add that every cell in my body hopes you're right. If you are I'll buy you a truck load of your favorite beer. If you don't drink I'll pay for a world class high end call girl.

if it happens it's because I guessed right...it could easily be 2001-02 again...It's only speculation at this point...I just wanted to show some great analogs with weak negative enso's...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...