tornadotony Posted April 17, 2013 Share Posted April 17, 2013 Get the shoe ready. Salt it, please. There is one thing that is becoming abundantly clear about tomorrow and tomorrow night that will probably make everything I've said to this point moot. The boundary layer is not going to decouple from the sfc tomorrow evening as per normal. With the high humidity and intense low-level shear-induced mechanical turbulence, this is the reality. Some of the overnight soundings have already been posted and I'm not about to beat that dead horse. Given this, significant severe weather is likely to occur across Oklahoma and Texas. That is something I really don't doubt anymore. Storm mode is still a question. If we see a warm frontal location/orientation like that of the NAM, we will likely see some upscale growth of a complex during the evening. If we see the warm front push farther N, we'll see more discrete activity across OK and a major tornado outbreak will be likely. Here's another catch, though. Even the NAM reorients the boundary N/S overnight, with the southern part of the front accelerating in response to cyclogenesis on the eastern Plains. If this happens, then even a QLCS would likely have embedded supercells and a significant tornado threat. One potential caveat is midday convection. The NAM generates an MCS around midday, and the Euro generates some convection that looks less organized. Either way, I don't think this hinders the threat too much either way. With such high levels of humidity and strong low-level flow, I think that even a cold pool from an MCS could be sufficiently modified for an evening/overnight threat. Farther north, a sleeper play tomorrow is the warm front across NE MO and central IL. Weak-mdt instability will be in place along the front, along with large, looping hodographs. After dark, the NAM and GFS show slight sfc stabilization, but with 50kt winds at 925mb, I would not rule out a tornado threat continuing during the overnight hours, and, depending on the progress of the warm front, maybe even approaching Chicago by 09z or so. A hail threat seems like a foregone conclusion. Then comes the fun on Thursday. This is going to be a very complex scenario that may result in some areas seeing a prolonged, multiple-round significant severe weather episode. The NAM, GFS, and Euro are actually in pretty good agreement about the evolution of convective activity on Thursday. After clearing out the original convection from IL/IN around 12z, another round of convection develops near the MS River and moves across nrn IL, nrn IN, and srn MI between about 15z to the west and 21z to the east. Ahead of that convection, CAPE exceeds 1000J/kg+ and 0-1km SRH of 200-300 m^2/s^2, with 0-6km shear of 45-60kt suggests that, at a minimum, semi-discrete supercell structures with a strong tornado threat are possible, even with this round of convection, despite the timing. And if that weren't enough, the GFS, Euro, and NAM recover the atmosphere immediately behind that round of convection and provide and environment for a significant QLCS with a wind and tornado threat to develop along the cold front around 21z and push across IL and IN. Farther south, the QLCS will continue down the front into AR and eventually push east across TN, KY, MS, and AL through the overnight hours Thursday night/Friday morning. There is some indication that more discrete convection could form ahead of the front giving an lack of capping over the warm sector. Once again, with the amount of boundary layer humidity and the strength of the low-level wind fields, wind and tornadoes will be possible with the QLCS, with that threat lasting overnight across the OH and TN Valleys. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andyhb Posted April 17, 2013 Share Posted April 17, 2013 Terrific post Tony, I'm going to paste the Thursday part of the discussion in the GL/OV board, if you don't mind. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tornadotony Posted April 17, 2013 Share Posted April 17, 2013 Terrific post Tony, I'm going to paste the Thursday part of the discussion in the GL/OV board, if you don't mind. That's fine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disc Posted April 17, 2013 Share Posted April 17, 2013 Great post, Tony. On another note, has anyone seen CUmet? I'm curious to know what his thoughts are on this set up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baroclinic_instability Posted April 17, 2013 Share Posted April 17, 2013 Great post, Tony. On another note, has anyone seen CUmet? I'm curious to know what his thoughts are on this set up. He only posts for the super outbreaks like April 27th. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andyhb Posted April 17, 2013 Share Posted April 17, 2013 By the way, recent RAP runs have the front clearing OKC by around 15z tomorrow. By 21z, there is 2000-3000+ J/kg of CAPE built up to the east of the dryline/SE of the WF. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoMo Posted April 17, 2013 Share Posted April 17, 2013 Day 2 is slight risk with a 30% hatched area from LA to SW MI with talks of an upgrade at some point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brettjrob Posted April 17, 2013 Share Posted April 17, 2013 HRRR is surprisingly aggressive compared to even the RAP through late morning. While the northern solutions that lift beyond the KS border can likely be discarded, I'm still completely stumped in the range between the NAM (near I-44) and something more like what extrapolation of this HRRR image would imply. And within that range are major differences in the scope of the threat, though the general area around LAW/SPS looks pretty primed either way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
patrick7032 Posted April 17, 2013 Share Posted April 17, 2013 FWIW...based on current obs...the NAM sfc forecast temp/winds at 00z initialization are pretty close to the current sfc obs. I agree with baro and others about the NAM "blue norther" plunge in western Oklahoma is unlikely. Many mets at our office stated earlier today that it was against climo and without a good arctic high push it was likely a bad forecast on the NAM's part. That said...believe the NAM frontal position is pretty close...maybe just a little far se. Using a model "blend" and ignoring the sfc front forecast from the GFS...I don't know about everyone else...but I think the front will largely parallel I-44 but roughly 50-80 miles northwest...or on a line from just north of Childress to just nw of OKC to ESE of ICT...paralleling I-35 in Kansas or just se of there. Just my "best guess". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jcwxguy Posted April 17, 2013 Share Posted April 17, 2013 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wxmeddler Posted April 17, 2013 Share Posted April 17, 2013 FWIW...based on current obs...the nam sfc forecast temp/winds at 00z initialization are pretty close to the current sfc obs. I agree with baro and others about the nam "blue norther" plunge in western Oklahoma is unlikely. Many mets at our office stated earlier today that it was against climo and without a good artic high push it was likely a bad forecast on tha NAM's part. That said...believe the NAM frontal position is pretty close...maybe just a little far se. Using a model "blend" and ignoring the sfc front forecast from the GFS...I don't know about everone else...but I think the front will largely parrel I-44 but roughly 50-80 miles northwest...or on a line from just north of Childress to just nw of OKC to ESE of ICT...paralleling I-35 in Kansas or just se of there. Just my "best guess". I think this is right on. Looking at the latest RAP runs... all the ingredients for a major outbreak in the works for the I-44 corridor and also near the WF in MO,IL and into W IN. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thewxmann Posted April 17, 2013 Share Posted April 17, 2013 HRRR is surprisingly aggressive compared to even the RAP through late morning. While the northern solutions that lift beyond the KS border can likely be discarded, I'm still completely stumped in the range between the NAM (near I-44) and something more like what extrapolation of this HRRR image would imply. And within that range are major differences in the scope of the threat, though the general area around LAW/SPS looks pretty primed either way. 12Z ECMWF takes the front to the KS/OK border at 18Z before it begins to crash south. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brettjrob Posted April 17, 2013 Share Posted April 17, 2013 I think this is right on. Looking at the latest RAP runs... all the ingredients for a major outbreak in the works for the I-44 corridor and also near the WF in MO,IL and into W IN. I also agree with his thinking on frontal position as a best guess. If it pans out, this should expose enough of the warm sector to high-end shear for a significant to borderline-major event. 12Z ECMWF takes the front to the KS/OK border at 18Z before it begins to crash south. I'd be surprised if it makes it that far N at all, though I wouldn't rule it out yet (am ruling out I-70, though). I also doubt it will come "crashing" until 3z-6z. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jcwxguy Posted April 17, 2013 Share Posted April 17, 2013 ...THERE IS A MDT RISK OF SVR TSTMS ACROSS PARTS OF NORTH TX AND OK TO EASTERN KS/SOUTHWEST MO... ...THERE IS A SLGT RISK OF SVR TSTMS FROM THE SOUTHERN PLAINS TO THE LOWER MO VALLEY/MIDWEST. 15% hatched tornado probs also Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LocoAko Posted April 17, 2013 Share Posted April 17, 2013 ..SOUTHERN PLAINS TO LOWER MO VALLEY/MIDWEST WELL-ABOVE TYPICAL GUIDANCE SPREAD CONTINUES INTO THE DAY 1 PERIOD...ACCENTUATED BY A MUCH MORE NORTHWARD AND SEEMINGLY LESS LIKELY SOLUTION OF THE 00Z GFS AS COMPARED TO THE 00Z NAM/12Z ECMWF. AMONG OTHER UNCERTAINTIES...THIS IS A FACTOR FOR ONLY MODEST CONFIDENCE IN SPECIFIC DETAILS LATER TODAY. EVEN SO...POTENTIALLY WIDESPREAD/MULTI-FACETED SEVERE WEATHER IS LIKELY ESPECIALLY INTO THIS AFTERNOON/EVENING. INITIALLY...ELEVATED STRONG/POTENTIALLY SEVERE TSTMS CAPABLE OF HAIL WILL LIKELY BE ONGOING THIS MORNING ACROSS PORTIONS OF THE LOWER/MIDDLE MO VALLEY AND ADJACENT MIDWEST. THIS WILL BE IN ASSOCIATION WITH A STRONG LOW LEVEL JET/WARM ADVECTION REGIME. FARTHER SOUTH...A MORE WIDESPREAD/SURFACE BASED TSTM THREAT WILL LIKELY EVOLVE AS EARLY AS THIS AFTERNOON...BUT ESPECIALLY INTO THIS EVENING/TONIGHT ACROSS THE SOUTHERN PLAINS TO THE LOWER MO VALLEY IN GENERAL VICINITY OF AFOREMENTIONED FRONTAL ZONE. WHILE NOT NECESSARILY LIKELY...THERE MAY BE SOME POSSIBILITY THAT TSTMS DEVELOP RELATIVELY EARLY IN THE AFTERNOON ACROSS PORTIONS OF NORTH TX INTO EASTERN OK AND PERHAPS EVEN THE OZARKS...AND POTENTIALLY BECOME SURFACE BASED WITHIN AN INCREASINGLY MOIST/UNINHIBITED BOUNDARY LAYER. SHOULD THIS OCCUR...DISCRETE SUPERCELLS CAPABLE OF LARGE HAIL/TORNADOES WOULD BE POSSIBLE. SURFACE BASED DEVELOPMENT DOES SEEM MORE PROBABLE NEAR THE TRIPLE POINT VICINITY OF DRYLINE/COMPOSITE FRONT...UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF A BIT STRONGER HEATING/MASS CONVERGENCE. THIS WOULD BE ACROSS PARTS OF NORTH-CENTRAL/NORTHWEST TX INTO SOUTHWEST/SOUTH-CENTRAL OK. ESPECIALLY GIVEN AN INTENSIFYING LOW LEVEL JET TOWARD/AFTER DARK...POTENTIAL WOULD EXIST FOR LARGE HAIL AND PERHAPS A FEW STRONG TORNADOES ACROSS THIS REGION. OTHERWISE...STORMS ARE EXPECTED TO INCREASE AFTER DARK IN VICINITY OF THE SOUTH-SOUTHWEST TO NORTH-NORTHEAST ORIENTED FRONTAL ZONE ACROSS OK INTO THE LOWER MO VALLEY AND EVENTUALLY MIDDLE MS VALLEY MIDWEST. SOME POTENTIAL FOR SURFACE BASED TSTMS/SUPERCELLS AND ASSOCIATED DAMAGING WIND/TORNADO POTENTIAL WILL EXIST MAINLY THROUGH THE EVENING IMMEDIATELY NEAR THE FRONT...BUT THERE WILL LIKELY BE A TENDENCY FOR UPDRAFTS TO BE UNDERCUT BY THE NOCTURNALLY SOUTH/SOUTHEASTWARD-ACCELERATING COLD FRONT. AS SUCH...LARGE HAIL MAY BECOME THE MOST PROBABLE/MORE WIDESPREAD CONCERN ACROSS THE REGION. Edited to add: went 15% hatched tor in SW OK, 30% wind, and hail 45% hatched across OK. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OKpowdah Posted April 17, 2013 Share Posted April 17, 2013 Tornado probs: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baroclinic_instability Posted April 17, 2013 Share Posted April 17, 2013 00z ECMWF came well south, looks actually a lot like the Rap. Didn't realize the ECMWF wunderground CAPE works...but it has 2700+ across SW Oklahoma by 21z...not sure if it is SBCAPE/ML/MU though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Reimer Posted April 17, 2013 Share Posted April 17, 2013 Looks like SPC is giving the model disagreement the shaft. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andyhb Posted April 17, 2013 Share Posted April 17, 2013 I think this is right on. Looking at the latest RAP runs... all the ingredients for a major outbreak in the works for the I-44 corridor and also near the WF in MO,IL and into W IN. Looking at the RAP instability parameters, once that LLJ fires up tomorrow, both the southern and northern threats, like you mentioned, could really take off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brettjrob Posted April 17, 2013 Share Posted April 17, 2013 Looks like SPC is giving the model disagreement the shaft. This meme gets a bit overused, but seriously... there's less chance that wasn't intentional tonight than the WF reaching Manitoba tomorrow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andyhb Posted April 17, 2013 Share Posted April 17, 2013 00z ECMWF came well south, looks actually a lot like the Rap. Didn't realize the ECMWF wunderground CAPE works...but it has 2700+ across SW Oklahoma by 21z...not sure if it is SBCAPE/ML/MU though. SW OK and the Wichita Falls area just looks deadly on the Euro by 00z. 2500-3000+ J/kg of CAPE pooling near the dryline and sfc winds backing fairly strongly (LLJ strength increasing of course as well). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stebo Posted April 17, 2013 Share Posted April 17, 2013 12Z ECMWF takes the front to the KS/OK border at 18Z before it begins to crash south. 00z doesn't have the front moving much Southward until 3z-6z Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thewxmann Posted April 17, 2013 Share Posted April 17, 2013 00z doesn't have the front moving much Southward until 3z-6z Yep, that's very similar to the NAM solution which has been consistently more or less quasistationary with the front through 0Z. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brettjrob Posted April 17, 2013 Share Posted April 17, 2013 SW OK and the Wichita Falls area just looks deadly on the Euro by 00z. 2500-3000+ J/kg of CAPE pooling near the dryline and sfc winds backing fairly strongly (LLJ strength increasing of course as well). Yeah, there's really not much more that can be said about that environment. Such a focused, but sky-high, tornado threat as progged. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
natecast Posted April 17, 2013 Share Posted April 17, 2013 Based off of dewpoint changes from the OK Mesonet, the WF is currently retreating northward, albeit slowly. The McAlester and Fittstown sites have seen +7 and +6 changes in the past hour. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baroclinic_instability Posted April 17, 2013 Share Posted April 17, 2013 SW OK and the Wichita Falls area just looks deadly on the Euro by 00z. 2500-3000+ J/kg of CAPE pooling near the dryline and sfc winds backing fairly strongly (LLJ strength increasing of course as well). The 00z ECMWF verbatim is ugly....it does look like a lot of guidance has a slight cold pool farther E towards Lawton. The SPC outlook generally matches the 00z EC quite well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stebo Posted April 17, 2013 Share Posted April 17, 2013 Yep, that's very similar to the NAM solution which has been consistently more or less quasistationary with the front through 0Z. What do you mean? Quasistationary from now to 00z ? Neither model shows that at all... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thewxmann Posted April 17, 2013 Share Posted April 17, 2013 What do you mean? Quasistationary from now to 00z ? Neither model shows that at all... Sorry, meant to say *roughly* quasistationary tmrw afternoon through 0Z and up to ~03Z (in stark contrast to the earlier ECMWF runs). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stebo Posted April 17, 2013 Share Posted April 17, 2013 Sorry, meant to say quasistationary tmrw afternoon through 0Z and up to ~03Z (in stark contrast to the earlier ECMWF runs). Ok, quasistationary after lifting well North into Northern Oklahoma early in the day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoMo Posted April 17, 2013 Share Posted April 17, 2013 I'm assuming the RAP on twisterdata has some sort of dewpoint/CAPE issue that produces these scary looking maps? Yeah that's 5-6, 0-1 KM with storms in NE OK and SE KS at the time displayed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.