Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,601
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    ArlyDude
    Newest Member
    ArlyDude
    Joined

Significant severe weather threats 4/8-10


OKpowdah

Recommended Posts

Day 3. (Tues)

 

day3prob_0730.gif

 

 

 

DAY 3 CONVECTIVE OUTLOOK     NWS STORM PREDICTION CENTER NORMAN OK   0229 AM CDT SUN APR 07 2013      VALID 091200Z - 101200Z      ...THERE IS A SLGT RISK OF SVR TSTMS FROM THE LOWER MO VALLEY TO THE   SRN PLAINS...      ...SYNOPSIS...   HIGHLY AMPLIFIED UPPER-LEVEL TROUGH OVER THE WEST SHOULD EVOLVE INTO   TWO DISTINCT SHORTWAVE IMPULSES...ONE MOVING NEWD TOWARDS THE   NRN/CNTRL PLAINS AND THE OTHER REMAINING IN THE BASE OF THE TROUGH   OVER NWRN MEXICO. MID-LEVEL SWLYS WILL INCREASE ACROSS THE   WARM/MOIST SECTOR IN RESPONSE TO THE LEAD IMPULSE. AT THE   SURFACE...CYCLONE IN THE LEE OF THE SRN ROCKIES SHOULD DEVELOP NEWD   AND REACH THE LOWER MO VALLEY BY TUE NIGHT. THE SRN PLAINS DRYLINE   WILL BE PROGRESSIVELY OVERTAKEN BY A COLD FRONT WHICH SHOULD REACH   CNTRL TX BY EARLY WED.      ...LOWER MO VALLEY TO THE SRN PLAINS...   A BROAD CORRIDOR OF ORGANIZED SEVERE POTENTIAL WITH ALL HAZARD TYPES   IS ANTICIPATED TUE AFTERNOON INTO WED MORNING. AN UPGRADE TO   MODERATE RISK WILL CONTINUE TO BE CONSIDERED IN LATER OUTLOOKS.      LOW CONFIDENCE EXISTS IN THE SYNOPTIC PATTERN GIVEN RELATIVELY LARGE   SPREAD IN GUIDANCE WITH THE HANDLING OF THE LEAD SHORTWAVE IMPULSE   EJECTING FROM THE WRN CONUS TROUGH. NCEP GUIDANCE REMAINS FASTER   THAN THE ECMWF/UKMET WITH THE PROGRESSION OF THE IMPULSE WHICH   AFFECTS POSITIONING OF THE DRYLINE/COLD FRONT...AND MORE BULLISH   WITH THE AMPLITUDE OF KINEMATICS OVER THE WARM/MOIST SECTOR. THIS   BREEDS SUBSTANTIAL UNCERTAINTY OVER WHERE TO PLACE HIGHER SEVERE   PROBABILITIES OR EVEN WHETHER THEY ARE NEEDED BEYOND AN ENHANCED   SLIGHT RISK.       REGARDLESS OF THE PATTERN DIFFERENCES...GIVEN STRENGTHENING RETURN   FLOW IN THE WRN GULF...A MODERATELY UNSTABLE AIR MASS WILL BECOME   MORE WIDESPREAD IN THE S-CNTRL CONUS. WITH STEEP MID-LEVEL LAPSE   RATES AND FORCING FOR ASCENT INCREASING THROUGH THE   PERIOD...SUPERCELLS AND ORGANIZED CLUSTERS SHOULD COMMENCE TUE   AFTERNOON IN PARTS OF KS AND DEVELOP S/EWD INTO THE SRN PLAINS AND   TOWARDS THE MID-MS VALLEY DURING THE EVENING/OVERNIGHT. LARGE HAIL   /SOME SIGNIFICANT/ AND TORNADOES WILL LIKELY BE THE PRIMARY HAZARDS.   WHILE THE THREAT FOR DAMAGING WINDS SHOULD INCREASE DURING THE   LATTER HALF OF THE PERIOD AS LOWER-LEVEL FLOW STRENGTHENS AND   CONVECTIVE MODE BECOMES MORE CLUSTER/LINEAR.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 474
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Best chance of convective precip of any significance (.10 per 3 hrs) is Northeast of the best confluence of MUCAPE/shear/any precip, up in Kansas, but for the people already living in Oklahoma, I'd think it'd be worth a shot...

 

Only the HRRR, but the lone cell near dusk on the state line is heading South of due East.

post-138-0-33664400-1365354172_thumb.gif

post-138-0-23054600-1365354342_thumb.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Best chance of convective precip of any significance (.10 per 3 hrs) is Northeast of the best confluence of MUCAPE/shear/any precip, up in Kansas, but for the people already living in Oklahoma, I'd think it'd be worth a shot...

 

Only the HRRR, but the lone cell near dusk on the state line is heading South of due East.

 

that one in KS hold on too

BHRI4rECQAIlzRs.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That would be hard to find a criteria for. It would be ridiculous to do it solely on number of tornadoes (Two EF5s makes for a very bad day), or solely on strength (100 EF2s makes for a very bad day).

Well they could probably just carry thru and name all big synoptic storms all year. You might miss some accidents etc. hopefully they don't but given their philosophy wouldn't be surprised.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That would be hard to find a criteria for. It would be ridiculous to do it solely on number of tornadoes (Two EF5s makes for a very bad day), or solely on strength (100 EF2s makes for a very bad day).

 

People have developed outbreak rating systems before, including members from this forum (although I can't seem to dig up the links).

 

You can combine various parameters such as casualties, combined path lengths of the tornadoes, number of significant (EF2+) tornadoes, number of violent (EF4+) tornadoes, number of long tracked tornadoes, total damage caused, etc. to get an overall rating through an algorithm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...