JBG Posted May 12, 2013 Share Posted May 12, 2013 So then a -NAO does lead to a hotter summer while a +NAO could lead to a cooler one or at least an average summer. It looks like a +NAO will stick around for a while. The strong blocking high pressure in eastern Canada is concerning if it sticks around for the hurricane season as it could block recurving storms. What about 2002? Wasn't that a relatively +NAO summer? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TWCCraig Posted May 18, 2013 Share Posted May 18, 2013 From latest guidance, it looks like it's going to be average to below average. The blocking and teleconnections are in favor of one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cfa Posted May 18, 2013 Share Posted May 18, 2013 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JSantanaNYC Posted May 18, 2013 Share Posted May 18, 2013 Every day I have notice the highs have not verified. Today for example suppose to be high of 74 and im still 61. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NEXtreme Posted May 18, 2013 Share Posted May 18, 2013 They've done a horrendous job with these outlooks since March. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snywx Posted May 18, 2013 Share Posted May 18, 2013 Todays forecast was blown big time... Didn't get above 59 today smh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BxEngine Posted May 19, 2013 Share Posted May 19, 2013 Todays forecast was blown big time... Didn't get above 59 today smh I hit 70 at like 10:30 am but spent the rest of the day hovering around 60 with rain and drizzle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snywx Posted May 19, 2013 Share Posted May 19, 2013 I hit 70 at like 10:30 am but spent the rest of the day hovering around 60 with rain and drizzle. My bad.. We actually hit 60 around 1pm then dropped back into the mid/upper 50's with lgt rain.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BxEngine Posted May 19, 2013 Share Posted May 19, 2013 My bad.. We actually hit 60 around 1pm then dropped back into the mid/upper 50's with lgt rain.. I didnt mean it like that, wasnt pulling an SNE and calling your temp out lol. Just a nasty afternoon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snywx Posted May 19, 2013 Share Posted May 19, 2013 I didnt mean it like that, wasnt pulling an SNE and calling your temp out lol. Just a nasty afternoon. I know lol... I actually went back and looked and I actually hit 60 @ 1pm lol.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SACRUS Posted May 19, 2013 Share Posted May 19, 2013 Thanks Bluewave. I wonder if you pulled the data from 66, 88,,91,93,95 if they also would have the strong blocking in may signal. Also curious if 2010 skewed anything one way the last 3 years (10-12)? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluewave Posted May 20, 2013 Author Share Posted May 20, 2013 Thanks Bluewave. I wonder if you pulled the data from 66, 88,,91,93,95 if they also would have the strong blocking in may signal. Also curious if 2010 skewed anything one way the last 3 years (10-12)? The strongest blocking signal of those years was 88,93, and 95. 2010 had the strongest blocking of a recent years but 2011, and 2012 featured blocking also. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluewave Posted May 28, 2013 Author Share Posted May 28, 2013 The closest matches to this June so far were 2001 and 1998. Both summers were cooler than the last three here with 1998 finishing -0.5 and 2001 +0.3 in NYC. So this summer looks like it has the potential to finish below the +1.1 (JJA) NYC temperature departure of 2012. While the Junes were different both years, the strong July heat signals of 2010, 2011, and 2012 were lacking. We'll have to wait until July to know if the relationship to June blocking will work out this summer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JBG Posted May 28, 2013 Share Posted May 28, 2013 The closest matches to this June so far were 2001 and 1998. Both summers were cooler than the last three here with 1998 finishing -0.5 and 2001 +0.3 in NYC. So this summer looks like it has the potential to finish below the +1.1 (JJA) NYC temperature departure of 2012. While the Junes were different both years, the strong July heat signals of 2010, 2011, and 2012 were lacking. We'll have to wait until July to know if the relationship to June blocking will work out this summer. 1998 was chilly. 2001 had its moments, especially in August. May was not a good match for either summer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Isotherm Posted May 28, 2013 Share Posted May 28, 2013 Looking at the temp departure patterns for the two summers Chris noted, I think 2001 has a better shot at being closer to reality for a number of reasons. 1) 2001 featured a persistent neutral ENSO pattern, while 1998 was a pre mod/strong La Nina summer. 2) The drought regime right now favors the core of the heat ridge in the Western Plains/Rockies, much like 2001, and not like 1998 with the heat ridge from TX-Southeast US. The developing pattern seems to suggest that the persistent heat will remain in the Plains/West with occasional hot shots into the Northeast. A trough "weakness" may be common in the Lakes and Northeast this summer. For the sake of all of us, let's hope 2001 is not a great analog that carries through the summer, fall, and then next winter. Thankfully, most analogs are not useful beyond a particular season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uncle W Posted May 28, 2013 Share Posted May 28, 2013 May will end up averaging close to May 1960, 1988 and 2009...the three were weak negative's for MAM period...This coming warm up after the cold is similar to 1956...1956 could be a good analog if July turns out cool...June was very hot mid month...One of my earliest summer weather memories was being outside when it was 99 degrees during a transit strike...july was very cool and August was closer to normal...2001 had record cool the first half and August had record heat... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nzucker Posted May 28, 2013 Share Posted May 28, 2013 Looking at the temp departure patterns for the two summers Chris noted, I think 2001 has a better shot at being closer to reality for a number of reasons. 1) 2001 featured a persistent neutral ENSO pattern, while 1998 was a pre mod/strong La Nina summer. 2) The drought regime right now favors the core of the heat ridge in the Western Plains/Rockies, much like 2001, and not like 1998 with the heat ridge from TX-Southeast US. The developing pattern seems to suggest that the persistent heat will remain in the Plains/West with occasional hot shots into the Northeast. A trough "weakness" may be common in the Lakes and Northeast this summer. For the sake of all of us, let's hope 2001 is not a great analog that carries through the summer, fall, and then next winter. Thankfully, most analogs are not useful beyond a particular season. I don't know if it will last, but we are approaching a fairly robust La Niña despite a warmer subsurface: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JBG Posted May 28, 2013 Share Posted May 28, 2013 What do you mean that May wasn't a good match? I just posted the 500 mb maps which were the closest 2 years since the 90's. You are never going to get an exact match, but both years featured less blocking over Greenland and the Arctic. There was also a strong ridge present across SE Canada like this May so far. Sorry, I mean in terms of sensible weather. May 2001 had a near-heat wave, i.e. two days over 90. We didn't get close. May 1998 had if I remember about seven days of straight rain. I don't recognize this past month's sensible weather as being close to either events. I was reading on my smartphone so didn't see the maps. 500 mb maps can be very close; and not impact on what we experience in the real world. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nzucker Posted May 28, 2013 Share Posted May 28, 2013 Sorry, I mean in terms of sensible weather. May 2001 had a near-heat wave, i.e. two days over 90. We didn't get close. May 1998 had if I remember about seven days of straight rain. I don't recognize this past month's sensible weather as being close to either events. I was reading on my smartphone so didn't see the maps. 500 mb maps can be very close; and not impact on what we experience in the real world. This was a very rainy May as well, just like 1998...Central Park has had over 7" of rainfall. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IntenseBlizzard2014 Posted May 28, 2013 Share Posted May 28, 2013 Looking at the temp departure patterns for the two summers Chris noted, I think 2001 has a better shot at being closer to reality for a number of reasons. 1) 2001 featured a persistent neutral ENSO pattern, while 1998 was a pre mod/strong La Nina summer. 2) The drought regime right now favors the core of the heat ridge in the Western Plains/Rockies, much like 2001, and not like 1998 with the heat ridge from TX-Southeast US. The developing pattern seems to suggest that the persistent heat will remain in the Plains/West with occasional hot shots into the Northeast. A trough "weakness" may be common in the Lakes and Northeast this summer. For the sake of all of us, let's hope 2001 is not a great analog that carries through the summer, fall, and then next winter. Thankfully, most analogs are not useful beyond a particular season. I know man. I'll feel heartbroken if it continues to copy throughout the year. Every time I think of the horrors that ensued that winter. Too painful to think about. >_< Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nzucker Posted May 28, 2013 Share Posted May 28, 2013 I know man. I'll feel heartbroken if it continues to copy throughout the year. Every time I think of the horrors that ensued that winter. Too painful to think about. >_< 2011-12 wasn't much better, to be honest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SACRUS Posted May 28, 2013 Share Posted May 28, 2013 This was a very rainy May as well, just like 1998...Central Park has had over 7" of rainfall. I posted in the other thread NYC and northern sections seem to be much wetter than other areas this month. 1998 was very wet area-wide. Here's a breakdown of May 1998 for the rest of the region EWR: +2.2 (6.52) LGA: +2.3 (6.02) JFK: +1.0 (5.61) TTN: +2.2 (7.29) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SACRUS Posted May 28, 2013 Share Posted May 28, 2013 id be cruous to see how 2006 compared against this year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IntenseBlizzard2014 Posted May 28, 2013 Share Posted May 28, 2013 2011-12 wasn't much better, to be honest. True. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SACRUS Posted May 28, 2013 Share Posted May 28, 2013 Thanks Bluewave great discussion and illustration of the prior (potential) analogs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluewave Posted May 28, 2013 Author Share Posted May 28, 2013 Thanks Bluewave great discussion and illustration of the prior (potential) analogs. Sure. We'll probably have to wait until July to know if the May blocking relationship holds for this summer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SACRUS Posted May 28, 2013 Share Posted May 28, 2013 Sure. 2006 was one of those summers that you would have expected more 90 degrees days at Central Park for the +0.7 departure. I think that some of the 90 degree stats that you or Uncle posted really showed an even greater disparity with the other local sites that we normally see that summer. NYC 2006 90(+) Jun : 1 Jul: 4 (5 days 88 or higher Aug: 3 EWR 2006 May: 1 Jun: 5 Jul: 12 Aug: 9 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnoSki14 Posted May 28, 2013 Share Posted May 28, 2013 I could see this being a more wetter, more humid summer with less extreme heat and a lot of storms. The gfs is showing a lot of activity in the tropics already in its longer range, which I haven't seen it show in a while, so that could add to the storminess. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uncle W Posted June 6, 2013 Share Posted June 6, 2013 The heavy rain potential with Andrea on top of 1.72" already at Central Park may also be signaling a cooler summer than the last three. All Junes that had a rainfall totals of 5 inches or more had summers cooler than 2010-2012. There tended to be a mean trough position in the East those years. June rainfall 2009..10.06" 2007...6.55"...TS Barry remnants 2006...8.55" 2003..10.27" 2001...5.29"...TS Allison remnants 1998...5.94" 1996...5.96" 500.png years with a wet May/June combo...We could see a top five wettest May/June combo... NYC has over 9" of rain for May and June so far...The record rainfall for May and June combined is 19.03" set in 1989...We probably won't see that but we could see a top five wettest May/June combo on record... year...May/June rains 1989.....19.03" 1972.....17.69" 1984.....15.50" 2009.....15.23" 2003.....13.70" 1968.....13.21" 2006.....13.17" 1948.....13.10" 1998.....12.88" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluewave Posted June 8, 2013 Author Share Posted June 8, 2013 years with a wet May/June combo...We could see a top five wettest May/June combo... NYC has over 9" of rain for May and June so far...The record rainfall for May and June combined is 19.03" set in 1989...We probably won't see that but we could see a top five wettest May/June combo on record... year...May/June rains 1989.....19.03" 1972.....17.69" 1984.....15.50" 2009.....15.23" 2003.....13.70" 1968.....13.21" 2006.....13.17" 1948.....13.10" 1998.....12.88" It's really impressive for Central Park to already have 6.49" for June by the 8th of the month. May 8th to June 8th picked up 14.49". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.