Deck Pic Posted March 7, 2013 Share Posted March 7, 2013 makes 3/5/01, 12/26/10, 1/22/05 feel like winning a million dollars this is a game changer...it is going to change everything...im not sure how...March 5th had a lasting effect for years....this isn't fading away quickly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JMU2004 Posted March 7, 2013 Share Posted March 7, 2013 Sucks for y'all. Total kick in the balls. Sorry it happened. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Chill Posted March 7, 2013 Share Posted March 7, 2013 The taste of vinegar soaked lemons dusted with tartar powder is unforgettable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Chill Posted March 7, 2013 Share Posted March 7, 2013 Told you it would be a tight gradient!Sucks for y'all. Total kick in the balls. Sorry it happened. No you're not. You said you were glad it happened in your sub sub forum. It's ok though. I'll have plenty of ops to troll you for years to come. To quote you. Karma is B Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JMU2004 Posted March 7, 2013 Share Posted March 7, 2013 Told you it would be a tight gradient!Sucks for y'all. Total kick in the balls. Sorry it happened. No you're not. You said you were glad it happened in your sub sub forum. It's ok though. I'll have plenty of ops to troll you for years to come. To quote you. Karma is B Nope.... Genuinely sorry for 99% of you. A select few had it coming. Never had any animosity toward you or zwytz. No need to be an ass, Bob. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skipper Posted March 7, 2013 Share Posted March 7, 2013 This is much worse than 2001, IMO. We knew it was falling apart a day before back then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ian Posted March 7, 2013 Share Posted March 7, 2013 Guess general tendency will be for forecasters to say it wasn't a huge bust but prob about the biggest I've seen. I mentioned it this morning but sometimes it's portrayed that we are nearing a post bust era. So to have one go down like this stings a bit. The progression of the bust might be as or more important than the bust itself IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeanVA Posted March 7, 2013 Share Posted March 7, 2013 This is pathetic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subtropics Posted March 7, 2013 Share Posted March 7, 2013 Worst bust in all my years. Stings. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlexD Posted March 7, 2013 Share Posted March 7, 2013 Doesn't hurt as much here, but we were never progged to get much more than 2".....I'm sure it hurts like hell expecting 8" and getting 1.5" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Chill Posted March 7, 2013 Share Posted March 7, 2013 Nope.... Genuinely sorry for 99% of you. A select few had it coming. Never had any animosity toward you or zwytz. No need to be an ass, Bob. Wasn't being an ass. Didn't know it was a select few when i stumbled on your post. Rubbed me the wrong way though. I'm pretty laid back and not a pot stir'er. We're good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORH_wxman Posted March 7, 2013 Share Posted March 7, 2013 Guess general tendency will be for forecasters to say it wasn't a huge bust but prob about the biggest I've seen. I mentioned it this morning but sometimes it's portrayed that we are nearing a post bust era. So to have one go down like this stings a bit. The progression of the bust might be as or more important than the bust itself IMO. They should if they are talking about DCA to BWI...it went as planned (or close) out west in the foothills of the Apps and down back SW in C VA...but for a massive population center it was an epic bust. I would have busted horribly had I been professionally forecasting for those cities. Even though the atmosphere doesn't care if there is a population under it, it matters to a meteorologist (or most who are genuine about preparing the public IMHO) when you don't get it right where everyone lives. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amped Posted March 7, 2013 Share Posted March 7, 2013 Sometimes I wonder if were all into meteorology because we're just a bunch of retards. But most times, I'm sure!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cast4 Posted March 7, 2013 Share Posted March 7, 2013 They should if they are talking about DCA to BWI...it went as planned (or close) out west in the foothills of the Apps and down back SW in C VA...but for a massive population center it was an epic bust. I would have busted horribly had I been professionally forecasting for those cities. Even though the atmosphere doesn't care if there is a population under it, it matters to a meteorologist (or most who are genuine about preparing the public IMHO) when you don't get it right where everyone lives. pretty big bust in southern pa as well. 0 inches here. Thank god winter is pretty much over for this area. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coach McGuirk Posted March 7, 2013 Share Posted March 7, 2013 So you were expecting 6-10 and got nothing. That's a bad one. There was no real cold air with this storm to begin with, so I thought that was a really bad sign. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
haudidoody Posted March 7, 2013 Share Posted March 7, 2013 I can't say I expected much living where I do... as I've got too much experience with borderline events here. That said, for the entire area, I do believe this is the biggest bust I can remember, going all the way back to 1996 living in Baltimore. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
87storms Posted March 7, 2013 Share Posted March 7, 2013 Sometimes I wonder if were all into meteorology because we're just a bunch of retards. But most times, I'm sure!! being interested is one thing, obsessively tracking models is another. i have a feeling a lot of us are control freaks that need to be reassured that something is going to happen, hence why we click the ncep refresh page as if it's going to have any effect on the outcome. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
87storms Posted March 7, 2013 Share Posted March 7, 2013 i don't think this is the biggest bust for me. yes, we didn't get 4-8" or even 2", but we received enough precip that with colder temps we should have been ok. it was a fickle storm and we put too much stock in rates > temps. a couple of degrees colder and less of a rain/snow mix last night would have made a big difference. the march 2001 forecast was off by a lot more...i was playing basketball in shorts and a t-shirt the day before with temps climbing into the upper 50s/low 60s if i remember correctly. that said, this was a disappointment and still a bust, but i'm not as frustrated as i thought i'd be. i'm more like "whatever". i grew up here, so even though this was a buzzkill, it doesn't surprise me all that much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amped Posted March 7, 2013 Share Posted March 7, 2013 being interested is one thing, obsessively tracking models is another. i have a feeling a lot of us are control freaks that need to be reassured that something is going to happen, hence why we click the ncep refresh page as if it's going to have any effect on the outcome. Yeah walking outside and seeing that it was 50f was something that might have been useful yesterday. But walking outside the house just isn't for me, I might miss the 19z HRRR. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
87storms Posted March 7, 2013 Share Posted March 7, 2013 Yeah walking outside and seeing that it was 50f was something that might have been useful yesterday. But walking outside the house just isn't for me, I might miss the 19z HRRR. when it's warmer the day before a storm than it was the few days prior, that's a yellow flag i guess. sometimes i wonder if there's too much data for forecasters to access nowadays. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORH_wxman Posted March 7, 2013 Share Posted March 7, 2013 This bust still is making me sick to my stomach despite me not being there...but I'm going to post some Euro data here that may have been a red flag: 12z Euro on Mar 5th valid at 30 hours for Mar 6 18z: 00z Euro on Mar 6th valid at 18 hours for Mar 6th 18z: You can see how the 35F isotherm doesn't get that close to the I-95 corrider. I have found the sfc on these have biased warm...uusally when 35F isotherm is over a coastal area with good precip and <0C mid-levels, it means closer to 32F sfc...I assumed they were running a bit warm again (which they probably did to the west), but this was probably even warmer than they would normally show for a big snow event. You can see the maps are obviously a bit harsh but usally the 35F isotherm will encompess a larger region where heacy wet snow falls. So with the obvious luxury of hindsight...this was a big red flag. I didn't believe it when I saw it...I figured a 33-34F paste bomb as 99% of mets would with the upper level data being shown by the models. The tucked cold in C VA may have been a clue in hindsight...but I'm not expert in that area's climo. Perhaps Wes will weigh in once he can. But I think if there was one red flag to take away when looking at guidance was the ECMWF sfc temps. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Curlyq Posted March 7, 2013 Share Posted March 7, 2013 Those forecasts were plain wrong. “This was the biggest bust in the history of the Capital Weather Gang,” said The Washington Post’s chief meteorologist, Jason Samenow. He said the major mistake was to accept computer models that said the amount of moisture in the storm would make up for the warmth of the air below. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J.Mike Posted March 7, 2013 Share Posted March 7, 2013 Topper apologized twice last night on WUSA. Made an effort to explain what went wrong. He frankly looked uncomfortable and admitted he's a big snow weenie, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amped Posted March 7, 2013 Share Posted March 7, 2013 The only thing that makes no sense to me is how we wound up with 20- 30" in March 29 1942. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
usedtobe Posted March 7, 2013 Share Posted March 7, 2013 Guess general tendency will be for forecasters to say it wasn't a huge bust but prob about the biggest I've seen. I mentioned it this morning but sometimes it's portrayed that we are nearing a post bust era. So to have one go down like this stings a bit. The progression of the bust might be as or more important than the bust itself IMO. I thinnk it was a big bust but certainly not the biggest. The biggest was a winter storm warning that verified as sunny the next morning with no snow at all. I don't remember the exact date but do remember the bust. I think there are things to learn from the storm. When a wound up storm develops so far west in Virginia, look for the easterly winds to mess up stuff around DC as it brings in too much warm air. secondly, don't trust the NAM surface temps when they show cold in March if the GFS is warmer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
winterymix Posted March 7, 2013 Share Posted March 7, 2013 ... The progression of the bust might be as or more important than the bust itself IMO. Yeah, everyone got a natural snow-expectation high off of the 0Z model run. Notably, Wes got a natural snow-expectation high at that time as well. When I awoke Wed. morning, it was ripping snow in Reisterstown at 5 am but trended light by 8 am. By 10 am it was melting faster than it was falling and toggled to rainy snow and then rain. Forecasters caught up in the mid- morning. I thinnk it was a big bust but certainly not the biggest. The biggest was a winter storm warning that verified as sunny the next morning with no snow at all. I don't remember the exact date but do remember the bust. I think there are things to learn from the storm. When a wound up storm develops so far west in Virginia, look for the easterly winds to mess up stuff around DC as it brings in too much warm air. secondly, don't trust the NAM surface temps when they show cold in March if the GFS is warmer. Wes: You've got a lot of good rep saved up from an amazing career and even a generally bullet-proof winter. Wishcasting gets to everyone unless they get real lean and mean. I was texting to Fozz the day before that the gradient would be east to west because the storm would pull warmer marine air as a nose and that western Baltimore County would do better than eastern and that western Carroll County would do better than eastern. At the same time, I watched all of the 2 meter temperature maps placing the 32 degree line up near the PA/NY border and thought balderdash! I guess the wishcasting becomes irresistible after a historic snow drought. Lurking in the back of the minds of even the most disciplined scientists is the idea of "regression to the mean". Mother nature don't care! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WxUSAF Posted March 7, 2013 Share Posted March 7, 2013 Will...those temps you showed DID verify too warm for most of the area. The 35F isotherm was pretty near I-95 for much of the day. I think the GFS had the surface temps the best, with DCA and BWI between 1-2C for most of the precip. NAM was obviously too cold and WAY too wet. It was just the heavy precip never got here. NAM, GFS and Euro were all too wet. DCA ended with 1.02", BWI with 0.75" and IAD with 0.92". GFS and Euro were closest (NAM was about 2 times those numbers), but they were still too wet. Whether the dynamic situation near RIC robbed us of moisture or the storm tracked and developed too differently, I think that was bigger issue. We knew surface temps would be above freezing, but figured with heavy precip, the profile would go isothermal right near 32F (much as it did on 1/26/2011) and we'd get plastered. That is in fact exactly what happened west of RIC to folks like Midlo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
North Balti Zen Posted March 7, 2013 Share Posted March 7, 2013 I think its a good guess that the convection near Richmond was one of the culprits. I know that mets and long-time observers are never overly comfortable seeing convection firing up way to the south toward the gulf in these kind of coastals since it robs energy further north, this was maybe a closer in example of that? In any event, it appears SNE will get some out of this, making this another version of the Boxing Day disaster for the Balt/DC area. This was the largest bust i have been around since it was progged to be big up to and even as gametime started. Worse than boxing day (which I cut short a Christmas trip to see family to get back ahead of). I wasn't around for March of 2001, so can't compare this to that. I do think that March 2001 storm was one of the analogs for this one in the days ahead of time, no? That right there was a massive red flag it turns out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gymengineer Posted March 7, 2013 Share Posted March 7, 2013 Will...those temps you showed DID verify too warm for most of the area. The 35F isotherm was pretty near I-95 for much of the day. I think the GFS had the surface temps the best, with DCA and BWI between 1-2C for most of the precip. NAM was obviously too cold and WAY too wet. It was just the heavy precip never got here. NAM, GFS and Euro were all too wet. DCA ended with 1.02", BWI with 0.75" and IAD with 0.92". GFS and Euro were closest (NAM was about 2 times those numbers), but they were still too wet. Whether the dynamic situation near RIC robbed us of moisture or the storm tracked and developed too differently, I think that was bigger issue. We knew surface temps would be above freezing, but figured with heavy precip, the profile would go isothermal right near 32F (much as it did on 1/26/2011) and we'd get plastered. That is in fact exactly what happened west of RIC to folks like Midlo. I completely agree with this. What happened west of RIC was what we were expecting here. Their precip rates absolutely overcame the surface warmth. And really, folks in mid/southwest Fairfax County as well as Prince William County, just as far east as Montgomery and Howard Counties in Maryland, experienced a pretty different storm. Their total precip was probably what the Euro/GFS were showing for DC proper and N/NW suburbs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WxUSAF Posted March 7, 2013 Share Posted March 7, 2013 I think this was a bigger bust than Boxing Day. The model consensus was far poorer in advance of that storm and while things seemed to trend back in our favor, there were still some red flags. Usually in big busts, the models catch on that something's about to go wrong in the 12-24 hours preceding the storm...they start trending away from big snows or something. The fact that I went to bed at 10pm (2 hours before the snow started) and EVERY model had trended bigger and bigger with the snow right up until that time (including the short-range models which were going bonkers) was something I haven't experienced in recent memory. I don't remember details about March 2001... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.