Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,587
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    LopezElliana
    Newest Member
    LopezElliana
    Joined

Significant Ocean Storm March 6-8 2013 Discussion Part III


earthlight

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Not when the other short term models are similiar

Again --- hours 30-42 are NOT short term for the NAM or any other meso model in my opinion.  Don't get sucked in to something crazy!!  Be happy it shows up but temper your expectations!!!  Again, the NAM is STILL shifting and lowering expectations with every single model run for about 12 hours forward!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The NAM might be a good model to track for the 2nd part of this storm since its more of a mesoscale feature. Just sayin'. 

ya that is where it would be very good. But I cant trust a model showing an inch of qpf for an inverted trough. I'd love for that to happen but I wouldn't be surprised if its much more tame in reality.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why not since the GFS and Euro dont have those amounts?

If the Nam is COMPLETELY off I don't think ANYONE will ever listen to what it's selling again. For it to show major moisture for so many runs in a row and to be off the NWS should just do away with the model. If ever the Nam was going to be right this would be a great time for it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...