Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,752
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Sasonah
    Newest Member
    Sasonah
    Joined

The March 5-7 White Lion Obs/Nowcasting Thread


Ji

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Agreed.  This was FAR more than a temp bust or even just a QPF bust.  The whole track and development of the storm was dramatically different from what models only 12 hours out were showing.  I hope NWS/LWX/HPC (someone) does a post-mortem to figure out why.  Wasn't any particular model either.  GFS hinted at something like this at times.  Maybe Euro did a bit.  But all busted pretty hard. 

GGEM had been showing a snow to rain system all along. Many including me laughed at the Idea of a warmfront moving down from the NE. Next time I will take it seriously.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Feel bad for you guys....Although I got snow in Front Royal and I shouldn't complain, I wouldn't have made the road trip if I knew I was only getting 9-10" of snow, I was hoping for 20". The fact that the NAM can switch main QPF region 30 miles east under 24hrs from an event is just a joke. I knew after 00z runs last night I was gonna get screwed compared to some bullseye spots. 

You should have gone about 30-60mi to your south.  That's where the 20+" totals are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agreed.  This was FAR more than a temp bust or even just a QPF bust.  The whole track and development of the storm was dramatically different from what models only 12 hours out were showing.  I hope NWS/LWX/HPC (someone) does a post-mortem to figure out why.  Wasn't any particular model either.  GFS hinted at something like this at times.  Maybe Euro did a bit.  But all busted pretty hard. 

I agree, the evolution was also hindered by the transfer or energy which was late in the game. It really did hurt us that it was a miller B type system, as the close transfer didn't really allow any of the colder air (relatively speaking) to enter the picture. It shut the flow off, and then the energy robbing did occur through the h5 center down in Virginia. QPF/temps were all dependent on evolution, an alignment of upper air support and dynamics, and more. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The initial WAA precip not laying down the blanket of snow many models initially anticipated was also a large problem in addition to the synoptic evolution. Indeed that wasn't the major player because the features didn't align as predicted, but it certainly would have helped those that had snow all day, but no base to accumulate on thanks to wet ground. 

 

Overall, its a number of things. Synoptic evolution however dominates, and dynamics couldn't override a warmer BL. It's not like the BL initially was that warm, with areas quickly over to snow last night despite temperatures in the upper 30's to near 40. However, the spotty precip allowed the column to saturate enough and bring dews up to the point of no return, and after that, it was downhill. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm struggling to understand why DT is crowing...he busted pretty hard as did everyone.  He did get NE MD in only 2-4", which is better than what most other forecasts turned out. 

 

dt had dc in 8-12 before anyone else.. never saw his last map but still

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The initial WAA precip not laying down the blanket of snow many models initially anticipated was also a large problem in addition to the synoptic evolution. Indeed that wasn't the major player because the features didn't align as predicted, but it certainly would have helped those that had snow all day, but no base to accumulate on thanks to wet ground. 

 

Overall, its a number of things. Synoptic evolution however dominates, and dynamics couldn't override a warmer BL. It's not like the BL initially was that warm, with areas quickly over to snow last night despite temperatures in the upper 30's to near 40. However, the spotty precip allowed the column to saturate enough and bring dews up to the point of no return, and after that, it was downhill. 

 

I had 1.5" at midnight last night from the initial WAA precip and was only at 2" at 7am this morning, and 4-5" by the end, despite moderate to heavy snow almost all day and temps 32-33.  I think part of the problem was that the 1.5" which was not super wet last night turned into 2" of slush by this morning - must have mixed or something during the night.  But the initial snow did not seem to help as the warmth won out in the end.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had 1.5" at midnight last night from the initial WAA precip and was only at 2" at 7am this morning, and 4-5" by the end, despite moderate to heavy snow almost all day and temps 32-33.  I think part of the problem was that the 1.5" which was not super wet last night turned into 2" of slush by this morning - must have mixed or something during the night.  But the initial snow did not seem to help as the warmth won out in the end.

For your locale, I find it more of a problem that the lulls in precip warmed the column and raised the dews as stated above. Also, the banding wasn't present as some of the later models had shown, and the WAA precip was robbed as the primary subdued. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's interesting that Dulles is reporting 3.3 inches of snow. I'm just under 3 miles away, 100 feet higher up, and can walk outside of my nice warm garage and measure 5 inches of compacted snow. I wish I'd put out a snowboard and kept up with measurements...

I guess elevation made that much of a difference?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For your locale, I find it more of a problem that the lulls in precip warmed the column and raised the dews as stated above. Also, the banding wasn't present as some of the later models had shown, and the WAA precip was robbed as the primary subdued. 

 

Fair enough, and thanks for the explanation, since I am by no means any sort of expert.  I wasn't complaining, just surprised it happened the way it did, especially with very high rates at times - I have seen 3"/hr rates and it seemed like that was what it should have been at times today, though you are right that there were significant lulls in between the heavier periods.

 

Areas with elevation near here did really well - Purcellville, Bluemont, etc - less than 10mi away but more than twice as much snow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's interesting that Dulles is reporting 3.3 inches of snow. I'm just under 3 miles away, 100 feet higher up, and can walk outside of my nice warm garage and measure 5 inches of compacted snow. I wish I'd put out a snowboard and kept up with measurements...

I guess elevation made that much of a difference?

 

I don't think it was elevation but rather the location of the heavier bursts of snow.  I am also at 5" compacted and I am only 255ft ASL.  Another guy in Gainesville which is about 5mi from here was reporting 8".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For your locale, I find it more of a problem that the lulls in precip warmed the column and raised the dews as stated above. Also, the banding wasn't present as some of the later models had shown, and the WAA precip was robbed as the primary subdued.

How did every model miss this while we were already receiving waa snow? That's just plain odd. Overwhelming guidance was saying to expect over .5 liquid by 7-9am. That's why I was really surprised when I woke up. I had a sinking feeling then but still refused to believe a complete bust was on tap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is more like the "March 5-7 White Lion Obs/WISHCASTING Thread" for those of us east of I-95!

Anyway, not sure if it was mentioned, but did anyone give any attention to those above normal water temps off the coast? Neither did I. Any kind of easterly component pretty much sealed the BL fate for those of us under 250'.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...