Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,880
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Gilzed378
    Newest Member
    Gilzed378
    Joined

March 6-8th Ocean Storm Discussion Part III


Baroclinic Zone

Recommended Posts

New thread. We have set up a specific storm banter thread to keep the banter down in these threads. We're going to start cracking down more as this event unfolds. Please stay on topic.

Banter thread

http://www.americanwx.com/bb/index.php/topic/39594-march-6-8-storm-banter/

Prior discussion thread

http://www.americanwx.com/bb/index.php/topic/39579-march-6-8th-ocean-storm-discussion-part-ii/

SREFs will be rolling out shortly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 2.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Before the 00z guidance starts coming in...here's where we stood at 18z:

 

12z GGEM: Scraper...fairly low impact for snow

12z Ukie: Moderate hit, moderate impact, perhaps higher interior elevated

12z Euro/ENS: Scraper...fairly low impact for snow (ensembles a tad more bullish)

18z RGEM: At least moderate and probable high impact snow (only goes to 48 hours)

15z SREFs: High impact snow...potentially historic for some

18z NAM: High impact snow...potentially historic for some

18z GFS/GEFS: High impact snow...potentially historic for some

 

 

Clearly the foreign guidance is far less threatening than the NCEP guidance, however, the Ukie and 18z RGEM did make big jumps toward the NCEP guidance...GGEM and Euro made jumps toward it as well, but are still quite far apart.

 

 

Almost all of these solutuons had at least moderate impact in terms of coastal flooding/beach erosion due to long duration fetch...the more amped up solutions were a bit worse, but even the scrapers will cause some issues on the coast.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  Quote

Yep, safe play.

I don't think you guys saw the Boston stations. Jerry and I don't ever say much about the news here. They weren't far off from about as much drama as a passing flurry. Just doesn't do the potential justice is all.

 

I sympathize somewhat, because we (NWS) can discuss uncertainty and it is understood and accepted. The TV guys can't get away with it as much. However, they could easily set some vague goal posts and continue to narrow the forecast down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Probably should also toss out there that the 18z gfs lost the vortmax over ny state that it had for the prior several runs. I am expecting a correction SE on the 0z suite from ncep but I may well be wrong, just my thoughts.

This is a thread about forecast discussion so that's mine. If the gfs stays with not having as much energy in NYS I think some of the mechanism for getting this as far NW is gone. At the same time the 18z rgem went the other way so it may be a not unprecedented off hour burp.

It's hard to draw a true compromise between models but the ncep qpf map seems fair. Obviously large changes are about to occur one way or the other as I do not feel the compromise will be even, at this point one model camp will win with much higher weighting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 3/5/2013 at 1:21 AM, capecod04 said:

HPC puts Boston 20-30percent chance of 12''+

 

Mentioned it in the other thread, but that makes sense given their favoring of an equal blend of the Ukie, Euro, GEM, and GFS. One out of those four is a big hit, so 20-30% seems on the nose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 3/5/2013 at 1:22 AM, OceanStWx said:

Mentioned it in the other thread, but that makes sense given their favoring of an equal blend of the Ukie, Euro, GEM, and GFS. One out of those four is a big hit, so 20-30% seems on the nose.

that seems pretty bullish IMO considering the storm is still going on after that

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 3/5/2013 at 1:22 AM, Rollo Tomasi said:

Probably should also toss out there that the 18z gfs lost the vortmax over ny state that it had for the prior several runs. I am expecting a correction SE on the 0z suite from ncep but I may well be wrong, just my thoughts.

 

 

I don't think your idea of an over-correction NW followed by gradual adjustment back SE it totally off base. You would hope we start seeing a narrowing towards a consensus.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 3/5/2013 at 1:26 AM, OceanStWx said:

I don't think your idea of an over-correction NW followed by gradual adjustment back SE it totally off base. You would hope we start seeing a narrowing towards a consensus.

It has played out very well to the 2013 playbook. We have had systems where the ggem and ukie came somewhat onboard at this range only to back off slightly as ncep collapsed se. I don't recall any with this much ensemble agreement, with the nogaps on board and presumably the rgem.

If the 18z gfs lost that feature and picks it back up this run its a monster. I just wonder if that was the first crack in the foundation... FIFO...first in first out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 3/5/2013 at 1:28 AM, Ginxy said:

Is the Ggem really a scraper? I mean I have 1.05 of QPF with 2 inch on the Cape

 

 

Its really drawn out...I suppose you could put it more under the moderate category. The Euro had near 1" in spots in SE MA too, but it was drawn out over like 40 hours.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 3/5/2013 at 1:28 AM, ORH_wxman said:

SREFs look like they are narrowing a bit for QPF...they actually brought the heavier QPF in ME south a bit but they are even juicier in E MA/RI/CT. Maybe starting to narrow the goal posts?

I Felt like the 18z gfs was doing the same. Perhaps that'll be the compromise, a weaker NYS s/w curtails a huge NW shift but still crushes between the narrowing goal posts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

matt noyes is interpreting models and giving a pretty bullish forecast from NE ct hills thru ORh hills .....shows a pretty sharp cut off from hills to 128 and then again to the coast. I wont say amounts but he's going pretty big.

 

http://www.mattnoyes.net/forecast/2013/03/late-day-forecast-video-light-snow-tapers-quiet-tuesday-midweek-storm.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 3/5/2013 at 1:42 AM, ORH_wxman said:

Its not going to be rain on the 128 belt...not a chance during the heavy stuff. It might end as RA/SN mix or -RA

 

More rain or mix would be a worry if the precip stayed light.

 

If it's rain back through 128 or west then it means we're getting rates of .02"/hour kinda stuff. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 3/5/2013 at 1:45 AM, Ginxy said:

You are carrying that mantra maybe too far but I concur. FYI Will of the GGEM so 1.05. 85 comes in 18 hrs, not too bad

 

It was sort of a joke but to be honest nothing is really going to sway me tonight until I see the Euro... unless the GFS takes a huge step in one direction (south or north). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 3/5/2013 at 1:47 AM, CT Rain said:

It was sort of a joke but to be honest nothing is really going to sway me tonight until I see the Euro... unless the GFS takes a huge step in one direction (south or north).

Oh I know what you meant. But if the GEFS even bust in half its still WSW.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 3/5/2013 at 1:47 AM, CT Rain said:

It was sort of a joke but to be honest nothing is really going to sway me tonight until I see the Euro... unless the GFS takes a huge step in one direction (south or north).

Apparently they had a super computer failure, euro will be delayed until Thursday. Storm is cancelled until then.

14 hours in the nam has that feathered appeal with multiple vortmax lowering heights up here. Tom Pettys famous song comes to mind at this moment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 3/5/2013 at 1:51 AM, BIrving said:

If the GEM and Ukie come more into line with the gfs and don't look too suspicious, then I'd be more apt to dismiss the EC (unless it also markedly came north).  lol

i know when gfs and euro run but what time do the ukie /gem/ rgem run ...if you don't mind

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...